free_r and jame_h [Busted+]

by **spearfish** on Tue Feb 26, 2008 9:05 pm

Have to wonder about that too.

I mean I know this is unorthodox Sully, but would you mind explaining your reasoning?

From my standpoint, those seem very arbitrary. The two I'm wondering about are JakeJake and free_r. I'm inclined to think "James_h" is a dummy account made by free_r's friend trying to screw with him.

And JakeJake? He seems too independent, he's posting everywhere --- I mean, I don't think he has time to control the slew of other accounts you listed.

by **timmytuttut88** on Tue Feb 26, 2008 9:13 pm

spearfish wrote:Have to wonder about that too.

I mean I know this is unorthodox Sully, but would you mind explaining your reasoning?

From my standpoint, those seem very arbitrary. The two I'm wondering about are JakeJake and free_r. I'm inclined to think "James_h" is a dummy account made by free_r's friend trying to screw with him.

And JakeJake? He seems too independent, he's posting everywhere --- I mean, I don't think he has time to control the slew of other accounts you listed.

by **spearfish** on Tue Feb 26, 2008 9:21 pm

Planning on filling that in Timmy ;-D ?

I mean, I know he could be selling the drama, in fact I think that's what he's doing. But still, this is sort of a guilty-until-proven-innocent kind of outlook.

And again, not sure if you're justified in throwing JakeJake in there because he bumped the thread.

by **lord voldemort** on Tue Feb 26, 2008 10:04 pm

sully800 wrote:lol, sorry I let this one go so long.

free_r is Busted with tomsemailis, jakejake, emma_juli, jame_h, rob14, maggiee, josh_josh, ihsor, fat f*ck

Now go back and see how many of those accounts were the ones bringing this thread up to 5 pages