Poor Labrador.....iancanton wrote:labrador's lack of significance means it ought to be only one territory
I am sure it is quite significant to some people.
Moderator: Cartographers
Really? You don't think there are enough small regions as it is? Most of this map is three-territory regions, and I'd rather see some variety.Unit_2 wrote:I split Quebec into North & South


true, although i’m sure that PEI is significant to even more people, in fact four times as many as labrador, yet PEI has only one territory to labrador's four. poor old PEI! anne of green gables must be turning in her grave at this favouritism toward labrador. in war, labrador, with only 15,000 male residents of all ages, would be incapable of raising a significant army. that’s one reason why it’s appropriate for labrador to be one single territory, so that it starts with the same number of armies as PEI instead of four times as many armies.Gozar wrote:The accent is in a different place on Quebec between the map and the legend.
Poor Labrador.....iancanton wrote:labrador's lack of significance means it ought to be only one territory![]()
I am sure it is quite significant to some people.
as explained above, it’s not four times as important as PEI.Lone.prophet wrote:labrador is as important as the rest
two wrongs don't make a right: if u keep separating them on every map, then some people will start to think of it as being actual fact. since newfoundland & labrador is a single province, it ought to be one continent. i'm seeing no overriding gameplay reason to split it into two. this is unlike quebec province, which is split into three continents (is four being suggested now?) because it is otherwise too big. with newfoundland & labrador as one continent of four territories, this map will, like the classic map, have three large continents the size of classic europe or north america and three small continents similar in size to classic south america.Lone.prophet wrote:in the canada map labrador also isnt the same region as newfoundland