TeeGee wrote:Just a suggestion, but what about a * next to players who are currently inactive ?
oh, good suggestion, what you think jr?
Moderator: Community Team
TeeGee wrote:Just a suggestion, but what about a * next to players who are currently inactive ?
I thought of this awhile ago. I really dint come to a conclusion since I wasnt positive if it was really information that was needed to be known.Blitzaholic wrote:TeeGee wrote:Just a suggestion, but what about a * next to players who are currently inactive ?
oh, good suggestion, what you think jr?
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:updated
your right. after looking over SkyT's active games, I just dont see him losing any for awhile.rebelman wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:updated
you will be doing a lot of this today
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:your right. after looking over SkyT's active games, I just dont see him losing any for awhile.rebelman wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:updated
you will be doing a lot of this today
happy2seeyou wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:your right. after looking over SkyT's active games, I just dont see him losing any for awhile.rebelman wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:updated
you will be doing a lot of this today
Orrrrr the fact that there are going to be many battle royals today....
pending.waiting for response from mods about more secret alliances.Warsteiner wrote:3 Warsteiner 3871
not the near future since that was posted in april?Aries wrote:I'd just like you all to notice that I wasn't on that list Although I will be sometime in the future....................
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users