Moderator: Tournament Directors
pjdonald wrote:There are 5 games left
I'll post my analysis on the good faith that if dcc reads it he won't act in bad faith in the Mongol game.
dcc1220 wrote:pjdonald wrote:There are 5 games left
I'll post my analysis on the good faith that if dcc reads it he won't act in bad faith in the Mongol game.
I don't think I could hurt you in that game even if I wanted to. In fact if I suicided into you, it might just prompt the other two to hit each other and help you overall.
However, this brings up an excellent question of sportsmanship. In a tournament like this, should players play each game logically for it's own sake, or consider the standings when deciding whom to attack?
I have played each game as a seperate battle and have not targeted an opponent based on the overall standings. At one point I became upset with Godd because he was hammering me in several games. He explained that he had to because I had taken a lead in the overall standings and he needed to make up points by making sure I was eliminated before him. I had fogotten the point situation at the time and understand why he did it, though I disagree with that strategy.
I feel the goal should be to win each individual game, not finished 2nd to another's 3rd. This is just something to think about as you set up the next tournament. With my way of thinking the point differential should be higher between 1st and 2nd to encourage players that the win is how they advance to the final or win the tournament.
Do you have a list of standings in terms of wins? Are the results the same?
(LOL, I just realized this is very similar to the argument in NASCAR standings)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users