Moderator: Cartographers
Coleman wrote:The text is terrible cairnswk, my eyes threw a fit. I don't know what you effect you were going for but if it was blurry and illegible, you did it.
I'm fine with the text on the spaces (Although the l in Gus Alex is goofy and a few other letters like that) but the legend text is intolerable. And you couldn't even center those continent bonus numbers for us?
It's time to show this one some love. The other maps you have look better right now.
oaktown wrote:Hmm... my big concern is that right now nothing about this map says Chicago. Chicago in the early 20th Century was the city of the first great skyscrapers, but by making everything out of little horizontal boxes you've made the city very small and flat. This is the home of Frank Lloyd Wright, Van Der Rohe, and Burham's White City. Where is the grandeur of the gold coast, the Wrigley Building, and the magnificent mile?
Specific visual concerns: The Little Italy font is kinda clumsy; there should be something else that is easier to read and cleaner looking. The legend text is bad - very pixelated - and there is too much mixing of font styles... is this Art Deco Chicago, or Art Nouveau Paris? The planes look like they're made of balsa wood. And why is the river not the same color as the lake?
Incandenza wrote:The Outfit West is brutal.... the white text on light pink background is not a good combo.
Much of what else I had to say was said already (mostly by the remarkably prescient oaktown).
cairnswk wrote:Could you show me some love too, rather than throwing it all gimil's way....
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:cairnswk wrote:Could you show me some love too, rather than throwing it all gimil's way....
I took a minute to realised what you ment
I was going to post a big piece of feedback for you, but ill hold off till the current concerns are met (mainly colemans thrashing ) I dnt want to bring up any issues that you may be planning to work on
onbekende wrote:need bonus calc?
oaktown wrote:As you carry on the work on this map, I hope that you will keep in mind my comments about the map looking somewhat horizontal for a city which has long prided itself in being very vertical.
Coleman wrote:The reason I'm being cruel is because I know you can take it and you are an excellent map maker. It's just right now this is well below what I typically expect to see this far in, which is frustrating because this is my favorite map of yours that you have going right now. (Not counting what is in Final Forge) I am just hoping for a visual update soon, and hoping you know where the big problems are, which it seems you do.
Coleman wrote:Sorry you feel the way but I too find this exchange intolerable because this isn't a quality I expected this long after being out of Map Ideas and it's hard to control the rage associated with that annoyance in this case because I know you can do better.
Don't worry to much about it, it's likely you won't have to deal with me again until you have xml.
Coleman wrote:There'll be need and reason for it soon enough...
I'll be gentler from now on, and push comments back when your timeline is bothering me.
... Can't you at least do something about the legend text real fast? Make it a different font or make it less blurry somehow?
cairnswk wrote:Incandenza wrote:The Outfit West is brutal.... the white text on light pink background is not a good combo.
Much of what else I had to say was said already (mostly by the remarkably prescient oaktown).
Gees, three of you on pills...what is happening....thanks Incadenza for that input... i will tkae it into account when i git around to doing this map again.
Incandenza wrote:
C'mon, you know I respect you. I apologize if that came off badly, or if I was piling on...
And now I want some cookies.
onbekende wrote:/me puts a bog box on the plate
seems cairnswk will need it
also, my bonus calcs?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users