declan.west wrote:what are peoples thoughts on bonuses?
As I've said, I don't think India or Nusa are worth more than 3, or South America more than 5.
Moderator: Cartographers
declan.west wrote:what are peoples thoughts on bonuses?
The Bison King wrote:5. Bonus Changes:
---Antarctica --> +5
What?! no way, that's too much.
Evil DIMwit wrote:Which is why I think India and Nusa should be reduced rather than Antarctica increased.
TaCktiX wrote:- I'm having difficulty seeing Central Africa and Terra Australis, the color is too bright compared to the parchment and it looks smudged anyway.
natty_dread wrote:What's up with territories like "Dinosauria" (why in low case?) and "Awosomia"? They sound kinda cheesy...
How did you come up with territory names, anyway?
TaCktiX wrote:I was referring to the text name of the regions, not the regions themselves. My bad for not clarifying.
00iCon wrote:I really like the new names!
Looking at the rule for Atlantis, I'm not completely sure of the xml's capabilities, but most other maps tend to revert a region when a player conquers it, at the start of the conqueror's next turn.
DJ Teflon wrote:00iCon wrote:I really like the new names!
Looking at the rule for Atlantis, I'm not completely sure of the xml's capabilities, but most other maps tend to revert a region when a player conquers it, at the start of the conqueror's next turn.
Slight wording change needed as Atlantis reverts to 1 at the start of your next turn. Other maps have short and easy ways ways of explaining this so it shouldn't be a big problem, maybe just delete the "and the end of your turn" bit at the end.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users