i think it was a good game. maybe it was slightly uneven, but that was exacerbated by traf being missing. overall, it was fun. and i'm glad to be on the winning side.. don't think i've won in a while

we don't know what you're in agreement with, since i don't think you've said anything . but seems that's the consensus

Vote Kong

As Max noted, I have been a wallflower since before it was named and I can give you all of my drops so I would be clear which leaves me against Homer's vantage point since if there are 2 baddies left, then something is afoot.


i'm only suspecting both of you if we're sure there are 2 baddies. we ...

But I still don't trust homer.


also, i don't think i've ever seen someone say they don't trust a player who is claiming to have gotten info that they're town. so you trying to tell us that my claim is false? you think i'm lying about you being town?

this is why i was so sure you're scum ...

Pfft.

Nobody posting, nobody voting, Rags, you might as well declare the next recess right now, again without any warning, this way Scum wins, that's obviously what you want anyway.


nobody has posted over the weekend. in a game down to 5 players, your reaction is crazy over the top for people ...

ok. time to make a reveal. this message is intended for dev and max. i am the school geek. my role is to get info on one player every recess.

in the last two recesses, i have learned that dev and max are both good kids. so now it comes down to: do we believe we have one or two bad kids left ...

ok. time to make a reveal. this message is intended for dev and max. i am the school geek. my role is to get info on one player every recess.

in the last two recesses, i have learned that dev and max are both good kids. so now it comes down to: do we believe we have one or two bad kids left ...

this is a bad time to go through a no-lynch, but it's still better than a mis-lynch. if we lynch a townie and then lose another at recess, it's 2-2 and we have no chance. if we can't come to a consensus, we go into next class with a 3-2 numbers edge. not the best spot to be in, but not unwinnable ...

we lost our protector. not sure if we would have another one. that's why i don't like the idea of a mass claim.

i was all in on a charle lynch D2 and proved to be right. and now, it seems that the only reason there's any suspicion on me now is that i'm all in on a max lynch. DDS said at the end of D3 that dev should be pressured. i'm not sure about that. he hasn't had the most solid game play, but i think ...

i've made my thoughts clear. there was always doubt about kingm, but nothing concrete. the way max has come in looks incredibly suspicious to me

Vote Max

Maxleod wrote: Sun Aug 02, 2026 10:29 am

hjelp wrote: Sun Aug 02, 2026 9:12 am I suggest we lynch kongming

Yeay I got that. Votes must be in bold red BTW.

I could switch my vote to kong, but I still think homer is the last scum. Why would he try to accuse me when I"m a confirmed townie??? That's just a desperate move because I'm after him.

claimed townie

I also notice a slight alignment in content what Kong and homer now post. They are trying to avoid attention and try to push for the two ”weak” (as I se it) Townies Max(Kingm) and dev.
They both are ”weak” in that sense - DDS accepted Kingm breadcrumb late and it was one line and dev still wasn’t ...

if i was a baddie, i wouldn't have been the first one jumping on voting charle. baddies might have jumped in later when they saw how the vote was going, but why would i initiate that vote and push so hard for it?

Max replaced Kingm and is one of the claimed wallflowers, on DDS’s wallflower-list


anybody can be a claimed wallflower. that's far from being a confirmed wallflower though.

i think, with no power roles claimed, dds was the obvious hit for scum. he was by far the most active. not sure if he was ...

agreed. we can't go into this assuming we're down to 1 bad student because LC counts as one out of the three we expect. so let's not get ahead of ourselves and assume we have this in the bag...

Maxleod wrote: Sun Jul 26, 2026 3:42 pm I also think there's only one scumbag left so barring an zpic screwup we won

FOS

how are we saying loose was scum? it's one thing for a godfather type role where an investigation shows as town. but that doesn't apply to the mod and the reveal of what a character was. if anything, loose was a 3rd party who wins if he survives to the point of a mafia win.

my suspicion at this ...

kong comes in and (rightly) says we aren't in a rush to lynch LC. discussion continues, LC does little to help his case except repeat that he wouldn't have lynched Annie, which is a weird defense to use because his only reason is "i wouldn't have been playing 100% to win". then max comes back in and ...

Who do you think of scum Homer, out of the people not participating?


well, my thought was Traf because inactivity is strange for him. but getting replaced rather than starting to participate might mean something in RL that is keeping him away. king is tough to pin.. because he does have a ...

this back and forth seems to be repetitive and going nowhere. i'm not convinced enough to drop the hammer to LC (i think he's at L-1, but haven't had mod confirmation on that). but the fact he's been there means something.

he's scum so the other remaining scum isn't putting in the 5th vote
the two ...

I'm pushing the wallflower thing because it has so far proven to be our best bet in confirming town. Why you push back on this idea is probably because something along the lines of "Well, town figuring out who is who goes against I play, grr mad!"



i'd be careful using words like "confirming ...

LC's game has been erratic. but at this point, i would lean more towards Traf. he has a history of not participating D1 because of his very outspoken opinion that the first day is a waste of time. but his near silence D2 is out of character. it's true that even getting him to L-1 may not draw a ...

i don't see it. if it's a rules violation, that would be up to the mod to step in. we're here to police AI use, not nit pick on whether a colon means a direct quote and not a paraphrasing.

i think it got the right guy this time. but i worry about the precedence this sets if that's a justification ...

i have no problem with hjelp dropping the hammer. but his line of reasoning makes no sense to me. did you vote charle because you think he broke some rule by "quoting" a note he claims to have received related to his role in the game?

geez, sure i started slow.. but i've posted considerably more than traf. not sure why i'm still being lumped in with him.

with all the back and forth happening, i remain stuck on charle. if i'm wrong on that and he ends up being a "good kid" teacher then i get that it'll make me look very ...