great work with the new map, been enjoying playing on it

not sure what the best is, but the WORST certainly is Antartica in World 2.1: 4 territories, 4 borders, 0 bonus troops.

LOL i love that it shows in the game log that you are awarded 0 for holding it...

There are 3 reasons for that...

1) Completeness...
2) Maintainability... (Easy to change ...

not sure what the best is, but the WORST certainly is Antartica in World 2.1: 4 territories, 4 borders, 0 bonus troops.

LOL i love that it shows in the game log that you are awarded 0 for holding it...

This is the way the game has always been played long before I was born (I'm 20 years old by the way) so this is all kinda pointless discussion.

Made even more pointless by the fact that you shouldn't be attacking 1v2 anyway. But if this is something you like to do a lot let me know and I'll play ...

That's fine, of course you cant attack with 2 if you have to leave 1 behind.

My point is that the defender can defend with more dice than the attacker is rolling with, which i feel is unbalanced, i.e. if the attacker rolls with 1, the defender should only roll 1 even if he has more than 2 troops IMO

I've noticed that a defender can roll 2 dice even when the attacker only rolls 1: Seems slightly unbalanced to me.

Also, as a sidenote, am pretty sure that in the tabletop version this was not in the core rules.

Couldn't find this talked about in a search, but do direct me if its already been ...

Right,

I think the game setup with the potential to last longer then your premium membership must be:

6 New Recruits, playing standard sequential, with no cards and adjacent fortifications, on World 2.1

Can anyone beat that?

(Clearly have far too much time on my hands)

I agree that a map of the city of rome would work really well. Lots of potential!

As this is my first post, can i start by saying hi to everyone.

The rules state that alliances must be made public, but i find that abit ambiguous. Can people please give their views (or direct me to somewhere its already been discussed) in reference to the following:

(i) Must the all the details ...