alex_white101 wrote:if he really wanted it he would have done it ages ago. he dosent play that many games anyway and even tho he has a normal rank everyone knows who he is, so wats the point? and also save these stupid polls for funny farm where noone really cares.

Ok, well that's another NO vote.

um you forgot the "no" choice in the poll. anyways i voted yes lack is awesome, he does a great job and he doesnt get enough appreciation, thanks lack for all you do. anyways, i think that "god of war" isnt exactly the best rank because as u said he is only a private 1st class. maybe another rank ...

um you forgot the "no" choice in the poll. anyways i voted yes lack is awesome, he does a great job and he doesnt get enough appreciation, thanks lack for all you do. anyways, i think that "god of war" isnt exactly the best rank because as u said he is only a private 1st class. maybe another rank ...

Lack could also add 16000 points to his account and become Conqueror. It'd ruin the fun of the game either way. What's the point of trying to get to the top if you can't?

I don't mean to imply he would be the "top"... it would be honorary. The Conquerer is still what it is: The #1 CC Player, at ...

I think you got a little something on your nose robbart... :?

Naw, I just want to give credit where credit is due. :D

In reality, Lack stays pretty silent and unobtrusive. There's nothing that says "lack"... (of course, CC does, but you know what I mean).

It's more about people becoming aware ...

Restricting games by rank has been rejected. Doesn't matter how the games are restricted, whether a min or a max, they're still restricted. If you want to set up a certain "level" of game, go to Callouts and find like-minded and -ranked players.

Wicked,

I know there is an obvious good reason to ...

I have been part of some games where a player is clearly going to lose, and if you look on the club forum you can see they are online, but are not taking there turn. I was wondering if there was a way to put a marker next to a players name when they are online.

Another idea similar to that would ...

GreecePwns wrote:I love the idea of honoring lack's accomplishments (and your totally fair poll).

* Suggestion Idea: Lack should be given an honorary rank, "God Of War".
* Specifics: Since apparently even Lack can't seem to gain rank (currently he's a Private first class!!) , I think we should provide an honorary "God Of War" rank. It would sit atop the scoreboard, as a gentle reminder of just ...

Oh and one more thing.

I see that Rocketry is not a premie. I guess he's not going to give out a real CC number when he joins either, is he?

Keep within the rules, provide a legit email addy, all seems like normal, realistic expectations of behavior on a site such as this.


aaah, a voice of reason and common sense. How refreshing. Thanks Robbart. :)

Sometimes we forget that after all is said and done, reasonable behavior is the ...

has been rejected. It would discriminate against lower ranks.

Huh?? How can employing a "rank maximum" be discriminating towards ranks below? It sets a CEILING, not a FLOOR for ranks allowed to play.

Please re-read the post.

sorry misread the post. Sounds ok but if you wanted to climb teh ...

gimil wrote:has been rejected. It would discriminate against lower ranks.

Huh?? How can employing a "rank maximum" be discriminating towards ranks below? It sets a CEILING, not a FLOOR for ranks allowed to play.

Please re-read the post.

* Suggestion Idea: I suggest that a new game option be employed, "Rank Maximums".
* Specifics: When the new game is created, only players of a certain rank and BELOW can join that game.
* Why it is needed: This allows players who are lower ranked to play with lower ranked players, without ...

Dude, just use a regular email address. What's the problem? This seems like such a minor annoyance.

If you had your account disabled for some reason, it ought to be a pain in the a$$ to talk to the moderators.

Keep within the rules, provide a legit email addy, all seems like normal, realistic ...

Personally, I don't care to have the chat removed. I like the chat window because, while this is a game, it is a SOCIAL game. It encourages us to interact, making this site more than a place to go and play a few games.

When I have a game with a lot of chat, especially fun chat between the players ...

Guys, instead of just saying such useful comments as, "worst idea ever", why don't you just tell me what you DON'T like about. Is there some way it would be OK? What would you change about it to be useful?

After you've played enough games, it gets old seeing game after game of deadbeats. I just ...

i want to put everyone below a certain score on my ignore list or actually put them on another list since i havent played with them, put them on a your score is too low list, otherwise i have to add thousands of peolple one at a time to my ignore list.

Sorry, I hadn't seen you in any games. Must ...

jlbsnake wrote:i really think there should be a quit button in case u just know you are dead and it taking up time that when u could be playing another game

Sorry, but that would lead to a serious abuse. Multis would just go crazy with it.

Upgrade to a premium and you can have unlimited games going.

Guys, instead of just saying such useful comments as, "worst idea ever", why don't you just tell me what you DON'T like about. Is there some way it would be OK? What would you change about it to be useful?

After you've played enough games, it gets old seeing game after game of deadbeats. I just ...

Risktaker17 wrote:Probably one of the worst ideas ever.

Well, why do you think that?

Stating it doesn't make it true.

What don't you like about it?

no.

Cause even if 4 of the 6 people deadbeated, instead of the game just ending, i want their points!

They should lose points if they have already made me wait 12 days. continguing the game makes them lose.

True, and as I said, it could be an option.

And the deadbeats would still lose points ...

I think this is a bad idea. Say in a 6 player game, 2 players deadbeat due to a broken internet or something. A third player, who is losing but does not want to lose points could deadbeat to draw the game.

You just described what a deadbeat is.

Ok, so perhaps we punish the deadbeats by docking ...

Deadbeating takes 24 hours
meaning if you only wait one round before the game ends it might work
however if your implying we wait 3 rounds its a waste of time.

I still dont see its importance,but understand if you can only play four games...

Ok, I don't believe you understand what a deadbeat is ...

I dont like it, Why loose the points when you could just continue the one on one for all of them? I recently won the artic map using all the neutral territories to my advantage.

your suggestion doesnt even take care of the wasted week, bad idea(IMO)

Why is it a bad idea, exactly, Ana?

Not ...