OK!!

Thank you, I agree. As I wrote to Karl, I simply cut & pasted comments from game chat on Kiron's wall. These comments were available for all to see in the game. Clearly, I was not engaging in secret diplomacy. Thank you for your support.

Your opinions are irrelevant to me "Owenshooter"

No, clearly it was not true. The truce was broken in round 28. Obviously, I would not be calling this person out if he had not so egregiously broken our agreement.

As I originated the thread, it is probably of no surprise that I think these strong words are entirely appropriate in this circumstance. Mind you, I do not use these words lightly. In fact, I have never used them in context of CC. In this case, I believed that someone holding the rank of general ...

looks like a crazy red-head I dated in the 90s

I would but it's my time to clean out my sock drawer and scoop the litter box.

I love obscure quotes....Thanks to all in the community who support my thinking on this subject.

Thank you Master Fenrir...I shall respect your wishes.

Ultimately, I placed this advisory so honorable players interested in a conquer based on skill can "Foe" this personage and avoid the time I with this unsavory individual.

Thanks ...Is there a liar/cheat setting I can use to filter?

It isn't unreasonable to expect to play in an honorable game, where people win or lose in a way that is a credit to Conquer Club.

This is meant as a well-intentioned advisory. If you read gamechat for our recent Waterloo game, you will see this individual is
a liar and cheat, certainly not to be trusted. If you must play with this odious individual, I strongly advice avoiding any alliances or truces of any kind. I do not mind ...