Help
Play States
Play By Clickable Map
Deploy: Click on territory to deploy, choose number to deploy and click again to make deployment
Assault: Click on a territory to Assault from, then on a territory to Assault (right click to Auto Assault)
Advance: Click on conquered territory to choose to advance, choose number to advance, then click again to advance. Click on conquering territory to advance zero.
Reinforce: Click on a territory to Reinforce from, then on a territory to Reinforce to. Click again to confirm.
Play By Keyboard and Mouse
N Key: Skip to next game, Jump to next game
B Key: Begin Turn
E Key: End Deployment, End Assaults, End Reinforcement
L Key: Later (decline to play spoils)
W,S Keys: Increase/decrease troop quantity (slow)
Q,A Keys: Increase/decrease troop quantity (fast)
Mouse Wheel: Change troop quantity by scrolling over the selected region.
CTRL Key + Click: You can always use CTRL-click instead of the right mouse button.
Middle Click: To advance to next stage (Begin Turn, End Assaults, etc.) click the middle mouse button anywhere on the map.
2010-03-14 03:29:11 - forestwolf42: @sblast1919 red is a threat to both of us and will be more dangerous if he takes over the whole neighborhood. I can weaken S1 through my sub station so that you can take it over and hopefully do some damage.
2010-03-14 23:48:52 - dearbravesheep: wow dude you should've sent that in a dm, teaming up on someone is not cool.
2010-03-15 00:12:37 - forestwolf42: I believe DM means "direct message" and I hope you meant something else because if you did mean direct message what you said made no sense at all
2010-03-15 02:45:28 - dearbravesheep: yes dm means direct message... The reason I say that is because this is a standard game, a free for all, and yes he is threat to me as well I just think openly teaming up is a little much.. Oh well though.
2010-03-15 17:09:47 - forestwolf42: and... teaming up behind his back isn't? Wasn't there something about "secrete alliances" in the rules and not making them? I'm confused
2010-03-15 21:24:28 - dearbravesheep: You really think there is much difference in a secret alliance and a non-secret alliance?? Do you think it'd be cool if the game started and someone said "alright everyone let's take out forestwolf42" and everyone agreed?
2010-03-15 23:52:13 - 57varieties: agreed! let's take out forestwolf42 ;)
2010-03-16 02:37:10 - forestwolf42: I'm I the only one that has issues with someone stated that the terms of service are BS and should be broken? I actually read those and intend to follow what I promised to do, even if it was to a website.
2010-03-16 02:37:38 - forestwolf42: I would rather be open about alliances then people doing it behind my back thank you very much.
2010-03-16 18:37:38 - dearbravesheep: I myself don't have a problem with it cause I am sure it happens often I am simply stating the fact that I think that's a little cold but oh well it's just a game right?
2010-03-16 18:47:14 - forestwolf42: I simply stating that secret alliances are cheating, and by suggested one you in turn could be considered guilty.
2010-03-16 20:27:58 - dearbravesheep: The first sentence under Rule #2 states: "Any form of diplomatic discussion between opponents must be posted in the game chat in English or in a language that all opponents understand." Which you did so you aren't breaking any rule but I also didn't
2010-03-16 20:28:31 - dearbravesheep: accuse you of breaking any rule, I just said that it is pretty messed up in a free for all. Which was, of course, my opinion.
2010-03-17 01:06:43 - forestwolf42: Dearbravesheep, You suggested that I should brake a rule, you implied that it would be better if I broke a rule. We both agreed to the terms of service so why in the world would you suggest I brake it?
2010-03-17 04:23:01 - dearbravesheep: First off, it is 'break' not 'brake'. And second, I said openly teaming is low and unsportsmanlike to ME. Of course that is an OPINION.. If you seek any further help try this www.dictionary.com I am done with this conversation, good luck forestwolf42.
2010-03-21 01:27:23 - forestwolf42: And Braking rules you agreed to follow out with is So much more sportsman like? You are either stupid or just plane morally bankrupt. I'm talking about your opinion and you believe that Braking oaths you agreed to is ok.
2010-03-21 01:30:10 - forestwolf42: I actually believe in following through with my promises. Your argument is weak, you know you suggest that I brake a promise so because of this you go low and insult my spelling which has NOTHING TO DO WITH MY ARGUMENT!!! You know I'm right.
2010-03-21 01:30:24 - forestwolf42: You place no value in promises. You are an ass.
2010-03-22 04:24:11 - dearbravesheep: Once again it is BREAK not brake. It is quite ironic that you call me stupid in the same sentence that you use the wrong 'plain'. A 'PLANE' is something that flies in the sky and 'plain' is the word you should have used.
2010-03-22 04:24:36 - dearbravesheep: Your argument is weak just like your knowledge of the English language.
2010-03-22 14:10:28 - forestwolf42: Rite know I'm just doing thish to spit you.
2010-03-22 14:10:51 - forestwolf42: How come you have No counter arguments?
2010-03-22 14:11:13 - forestwolf42: Remember when I said. that you insult my spelling because you have no counter to my argument?
2010-03-22 14:11:46 - forestwolf42: You basically proved me right by, insulting my spelling again.
2010-03-22 14:12:10 - forestwolf42: And having no counter to my argument.
2010-03-22 14:12:56 - forestwolf42: If that's not stupid then I don't know what is.
2010-03-22 23:16:28 - forestwolf42: gg
2010-03-23 00:07:05 - 57varieties: there's some irony here somewhere..
2010-03-23 23:28:49 - forestwolf42: That's what I thought ^.^