0
|
World 2.1 - Nuclear - Round 29
|
   |
 |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
click to deploy here
click to assault from here
click to assault to here
click to reinforce from here
click to reinforce to here
click to reinforce to here
right-click to reinforce from here
right-click to reinforce from here
click to select/deselect
right-click to play set
right-click to play set
click again to deploy troops
click again to assault
right-click to auto-assault
right-click to auto-assault
click again to advance troops
right-click to advance zero
right-click to advance zero
click to advance zero troops
click again to reinforce troops
click again to reinforce troops
right-click to reinforce from here
right-click to reinforce from here
-
0
r:uckuki
-
0
g:Metsfanmax
-
0
b:kawe85
-
7
y:josko.ri
Statistics
|  |  |  |  |  | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4.8 | 7 | 83 | 121 | 46 |
Game #6436376: 4 Players, Standard, Nuclear, Sequential, Chained
Standard Tournament: Nuking the World
Label: round 1 game 5
Standard Tournament: Nuking the World
Label: round 1 game 5
Help
Play States
| WAITING | CASH | DEPLOY | ASSAULT | ADVANCE | DEFERRED | REINFORCE | ELIMINATED | VICTORY | |
| Above are the possible play states of a turn. Click on each for a description. Note: the main phases of a turn are DEPLOY, ASSAULT, REINFORCE - other phases occur as they are relevant. | |||||||||
Play By Clickable Map
Deploy: Click on territory to deploy, choose number to deploy and click again to make deploymentAssault: Click on a territory to Assault from, then on a territory to Assault (right click to Auto Assault)
Advance: Click on conquered territory to choose to advance, choose number to advance, then click again to advance. Click on conquering territory to advance zero.
Reinforce: Click on a territory to Reinforce from, then on a territory to Reinforce to. Click again to confirm.
Play By Keyboard and Mouse
N Key: Skip to next game, Jump to next gameB Key: Begin Turn
E Key: End Deployment, End Assaults, End Reinforcement
L Key: Later (decline to play spoils)
W,S Keys: Increase/decrease troop quantity (slow)
Q,A Keys: Increase/decrease troop quantity (fast)
Mouse Wheel: Change troop quantity by scrolling over the selected region.
CTRL Key + Click: You can always use CTRL-click instead of the right mouse button.
Middle Click: To advance to next stage (Begin Turn, End Assaults, etc.) click the middle mouse button anywhere on the map.
- Players
- 4
- Game Type
- Standard
- Slots Per Player
- 1
- Initial Troops
- Automatic
- Play Order
- Sequential
- Spoils
- Nuclear
- Reinforcements
- Chained
- Fog of War
- No
- Trench Warfare
- No
- Round Limit
- None
- Round Length
- 24 Hours
| Players | 4 | |
| Game Type | Standard | In a standard game each player fends for himself and there is only one winner. |
| Initial Troops | Automatic | Regions are randomly distributed at the start of the game and each region starts with three troops. |
| Play Order | Sequential | A player is selected at random to go first and then subsequent players follow in turn. During a team game the play order alternates between the teams. |
| Spoils | Nuclear | At the end of your turn if you have conquered at least one region you will get 'spoils.' Once you have three of the same color (or three different) these can be traded in. Nuclear Spoils means that you do not get any bonus troops for trading in. Instead each region that you trade in is 'nuked' to a single neutral troop (even if you own it). |
| Reinforcements | Chained | At the end of your turn you can reinforce once from one region to another (they must be connected by regions that you own). |
| Fog of War | No | Fog of War masks enemy positions that are not adjacent to your forces (or your team's forces). It also masks region and zone names in the log |
| Trench Warfare | No | You can only assault from regions held since the start of your turn. If you conquer a region during your turn you cannot assault from it until your next turn. |
| Round Limit | None | |
| Round Length | 24 Hours | Each player has up to 24 hours to complete a turn. You will get an email notification when it is your turn to play. |
| Scoring | Regular | Regular leaderboard scoring is in place for this game |
Please see our Game Options Help Page for more details on all the different options.
 | World 2.1: | 113 Territories, 23 Continents, Min Reinforcements: 3 |  |
Toggles change the setting temporarily, other settings are saved on a per map basis. For site-wide settings see our Game Settings page.
2010-02-14 23:38:34 - Game has been initialized
2010-03-25 12:33:18 - josko.ri eliminated kawe85 from the game
2010-03-28 22:59:15 - josko.ri eliminated uckuki from the game
2010-03-29 09:17:59 - josko.ri eliminated Metsfanmax from the game
2010-03-29 09:17:59 - josko.ri won the game
2010-03-29 09:17:59 - uckuki lost 12 points
2010-03-29 09:17:59 - Metsfanmax lost 10 points
2010-03-29 09:17:59 - kawe85 lost 5 points
2010-03-29 09:17:59 - josko.ri gained 27 points
2010-03-25 12:33:18 - josko.ri eliminated kawe85 from the game
2010-03-28 22:59:15 - josko.ri eliminated uckuki from the game
2010-03-29 09:17:59 - josko.ri eliminated Metsfanmax from the game
2010-03-29 09:17:59 - josko.ri won the game
2010-03-29 09:17:59 - uckuki lost 12 points
2010-03-29 09:17:59 - Metsfanmax lost 10 points
2010-03-29 09:17:59 - kawe85 lost 5 points
2010-03-29 09:17:59 - josko.ri gained 27 points
2010-02-14 23:38:53 - josko.ri: gl :)
2010-02-16 11:05:45 - uckuki: hello all and gl
2010-02-19 23:27:18 - josko.ri: so metsfanmax if you really want fight vs me it is not problem we can attack each other and uckuki will win
2010-02-19 23:34:22 - josko.ri: I entered you in southern africa because you entered me in the horn. if you only take back southern africa and dont attack areas that I own, I will stop attack the areas that you own. so, you decide
2010-02-20 16:55:00 - Metsfanmax: Seeing as you basically control all of Oceania, I don't see why me trying to have more than one sub-continent is a problem. If you want to sacrifice your chance at a win just so you can make sure I never get more than 10 troops per turn, that's your call.
2010-02-21 12:06:41 - josko.ri: it is not problem that you want more that one subregion, problem is that you want region that I own. you could choose some another subregion, for example russia, where you have 3 regions that is not yours and nobody showed intention to conquer russia
2010-02-21 12:09:38 - josko.ri: but you rather choose the horn, where you own 0 regions and I own 4 regions, and bonus is 3, while in russia bonus is 4. as you can see, I didnt attack you in tanzania. it shows my intention that I only want the horn back and dont want to fight vs you
2010-02-21 12:11:17 - josko.ri: it is logical that I own oceania because I chose subregion that nobody showed intention so it was easy to conquer. red also conquer region that nobody show intention. you are the only trying to conquer region that other player own.
2010-02-21 15:42:36 - Metsfanmax: I don't even understand your logic. If you're upset becaues I attacked you, fine. However, there's no way it's logical for me to get two subcontinents far away from each other instead of trying to build up connected ones and attempt to get Africa.
2010-02-21 15:43:45 - Metsfanmax: So, I will repeat: if you care so much about the horn that you're willing to fight me for it, that's your prerogative, but you're just wasting troops that could have been used to fight red.
2010-02-21 22:16:39 - josko.ri: it is very hard to recognize your tactics. what will 8 troops on tanzania do except attack me? even if you didnt attack me I know your plans and I am not dumb fightning vs red and leaving you to crush me in the horn.
2010-02-21 22:17:44 - josko.ri: my logic is "if you need subregions choose the one that nobody is interested. for example russia which is 4 troops bonus"
2010-02-21 22:19:08 - josko.ri: if you see above, everybody's logic is like mine. red choose scandinavia and la plata, blue choose china and india, i choose oceania. only you choose subregion that other player own. so I dont know whose logic is wrong here
2010-02-22 21:45:33 - Metsfanmax: It's not my job to make clear what my tactics are, that would be making it too easy. Again, the situation is quite simple: if you want to hold onto the Horn, you'll have to sacrifice troops that you would otherwise be using to attack red and blue.
2010-02-22 21:45:44 - Metsfanmax: If you don't like that situation, I don't see how it's my problem.
2010-02-23 12:17:50 - josko.ri: sorry but I was forced to do that. I offered you peace in africa and yu attacked me twice and said that you will continue, so I had to declare war unlikely
2010-02-23 12:19:35 - josko.ri: I attacked red in eu, so I didnt wonder when red attacked me and conquer whole central america. so I think you also didnt have to wonder because you attacked me twice.
2010-02-23 12:20:33 - josko.ri: do you expected that I fight vs red and blue while you attack me? lol :) I will not be the only one vs the everybody for sure
2010-02-23 12:27:38 - josko.ri: you told me about sacrifice, but you are the one who first sacrificed your units, which could be used better than sacrifice on me in the horn. I think I was clear about situation in africa, so I will repeat if you missed it:
2010-02-23 12:27:44 - josko.ri: I entered you in southern africa because you entered me in the horn. if you only take back southern africa and dont attack areas that I own, I will stop attack the areas that you own. so, you decide
2010-02-23 12:28:15 - josko.ri: and, you decided war. so, let it be the war :)
2010-02-23 14:57:37 - Metsfanmax: I still don't understand why this situation is confusing or needs explaining. I attacked you, you attacked me back. It isn't "war," it's just each player doing what's best for him. Is that not what you do in every game?
2010-02-23 15:16:48 - josko.ri: yes, I supposed you will wonder why I attacked you(probably you expected thatI will do something else), but I see you understand the situation.
2010-02-23 15:17:51 - josko.ri: I just wonder then why do you attacked me if you knew that I will attack you back? of course, it is not good for both of us, but it is worse to you tan to me because I was stronger from the beginning
2010-02-23 20:08:49 - Metsfanmax: I can only predict rational moves, and I thought the most rational move for you would be to give up the horn and focus on building up your defense of Oceania and surrounding areas.
2010-02-23 20:09:28 - Metsfanmax: Not to criticize your play style, but at the end of Round 6 red had 94 troops to your 67, with 9 more troops due per turn. So I didn't think you would make a serious play in South Africa
2010-02-23 22:53:31 - josko.ri: that s because nobody attacked red and you attacked only me. so hoe
2010-02-23 22:54:43 - josko.ri: ...so how could I have more than red in that conditions? I expected that you will cooperate when I attacked red with no-attacking me. finally, it is good for you that me and red attack each other while your troops growing up
2010-02-23 22:58:00 - josko.ri: ...but you attacked me. so I will not be dumb to fight vs red while you crushing me at the same time. how can I survive in that conditions? so I rather choose to eliminate danger from you, and we all now have only one chance if blue attacks red.
2010-02-23 22:59:42 - josko.ri: if not, red will win for sure. I will not be the only who will fight vs him
2010-02-24 05:06:51 - Metsfanmax: So let me get this straight - your strategy is to fight against me while letting another player control the map, and then hope that the third-strongest player will attack him when he doesn't have any
2010-02-24 05:06:55 - Metsfanmax: troops near red?
2010-02-24 11:26:58 - josko.ri: nope. my strategy WAS to fight red and be in peace with you, but you didnt accept that tactics (which was good for you because your troops would grow up while my and red going down)
2010-02-24 11:30:19 - josko.ri: so you forced me to change the tactics. I asked you in chat for no-attacking, I also didnt attack you in tanzania when I could do it 5-1 (round 4), but it wasnt enough that you realize that for you is good tactics to be in peace with me...
2010-02-25 04:09:41 - Metsfanmax: You're lacking global insight on the game; even if I'm "gaining" troops, I'd still be not gaining nearly as many as you, so I wouldn't be a threat.
2010-02-25 04:10:37 - Metsfanmax: It seems to me that you're willing to sacrifice winning chances to defend a subregion you luckily started the game with.
2010-02-26 23:12:12 - josko.ri: uckuki, I thought that you will realize that my no-attacking europe last turn (14-2 when I was on morocco), and letting you +9 bonus with that (6eu+3 western eu) means that I want peace in eu-africa border. but you attacked me at morocco after that
2010-02-26 23:12:41 - josko.ri: so that s why I attacked you in eu this turn
2010-02-27 07:47:36 - uckuki: no problema buddy, do ur thing :)
2010-02-27 07:49:42 - uckuki: in nuclear games, I don't really go for hold-and-build strategy, soon number of troops will start going down, so, I will try to take as many of troops as possible while I still can
2010-03-04 11:44:11 - Moonchild: kralju dmitre zvonimireeeeeeeeee :P
2010-03-24 00:09:52 - uckuki: gg josko
2010-03-25 12:37:25 - josko.ri: gg all :)
2010-02-16 11:05:45 - uckuki: hello all and gl
2010-02-19 23:27:18 - josko.ri: so metsfanmax if you really want fight vs me it is not problem we can attack each other and uckuki will win
2010-02-19 23:34:22 - josko.ri: I entered you in southern africa because you entered me in the horn. if you only take back southern africa and dont attack areas that I own, I will stop attack the areas that you own. so, you decide
2010-02-20 16:55:00 - Metsfanmax: Seeing as you basically control all of Oceania, I don't see why me trying to have more than one sub-continent is a problem. If you want to sacrifice your chance at a win just so you can make sure I never get more than 10 troops per turn, that's your call.
2010-02-21 12:06:41 - josko.ri: it is not problem that you want more that one subregion, problem is that you want region that I own. you could choose some another subregion, for example russia, where you have 3 regions that is not yours and nobody showed intention to conquer russia
2010-02-21 12:09:38 - josko.ri: but you rather choose the horn, where you own 0 regions and I own 4 regions, and bonus is 3, while in russia bonus is 4. as you can see, I didnt attack you in tanzania. it shows my intention that I only want the horn back and dont want to fight vs you
2010-02-21 12:11:17 - josko.ri: it is logical that I own oceania because I chose subregion that nobody showed intention so it was easy to conquer. red also conquer region that nobody show intention. you are the only trying to conquer region that other player own.
2010-02-21 15:42:36 - Metsfanmax: I don't even understand your logic. If you're upset becaues I attacked you, fine. However, there's no way it's logical for me to get two subcontinents far away from each other instead of trying to build up connected ones and attempt to get Africa.
2010-02-21 15:43:45 - Metsfanmax: So, I will repeat: if you care so much about the horn that you're willing to fight me for it, that's your prerogative, but you're just wasting troops that could have been used to fight red.
2010-02-21 22:16:39 - josko.ri: it is very hard to recognize your tactics. what will 8 troops on tanzania do except attack me? even if you didnt attack me I know your plans and I am not dumb fightning vs red and leaving you to crush me in the horn.
2010-02-21 22:17:44 - josko.ri: my logic is "if you need subregions choose the one that nobody is interested. for example russia which is 4 troops bonus"
2010-02-21 22:19:08 - josko.ri: if you see above, everybody's logic is like mine. red choose scandinavia and la plata, blue choose china and india, i choose oceania. only you choose subregion that other player own. so I dont know whose logic is wrong here
2010-02-22 21:45:33 - Metsfanmax: It's not my job to make clear what my tactics are, that would be making it too easy. Again, the situation is quite simple: if you want to hold onto the Horn, you'll have to sacrifice troops that you would otherwise be using to attack red and blue.
2010-02-22 21:45:44 - Metsfanmax: If you don't like that situation, I don't see how it's my problem.
2010-02-23 12:17:50 - josko.ri: sorry but I was forced to do that. I offered you peace in africa and yu attacked me twice and said that you will continue, so I had to declare war unlikely
2010-02-23 12:19:35 - josko.ri: I attacked red in eu, so I didnt wonder when red attacked me and conquer whole central america. so I think you also didnt have to wonder because you attacked me twice.
2010-02-23 12:20:33 - josko.ri: do you expected that I fight vs red and blue while you attack me? lol :) I will not be the only one vs the everybody for sure
2010-02-23 12:27:38 - josko.ri: you told me about sacrifice, but you are the one who first sacrificed your units, which could be used better than sacrifice on me in the horn. I think I was clear about situation in africa, so I will repeat if you missed it:
2010-02-23 12:27:44 - josko.ri: I entered you in southern africa because you entered me in the horn. if you only take back southern africa and dont attack areas that I own, I will stop attack the areas that you own. so, you decide
2010-02-23 12:28:15 - josko.ri: and, you decided war. so, let it be the war :)
2010-02-23 14:57:37 - Metsfanmax: I still don't understand why this situation is confusing or needs explaining. I attacked you, you attacked me back. It isn't "war," it's just each player doing what's best for him. Is that not what you do in every game?
2010-02-23 15:16:48 - josko.ri: yes, I supposed you will wonder why I attacked you(probably you expected thatI will do something else), but I see you understand the situation.
2010-02-23 15:17:51 - josko.ri: I just wonder then why do you attacked me if you knew that I will attack you back? of course, it is not good for both of us, but it is worse to you tan to me because I was stronger from the beginning
2010-02-23 20:08:49 - Metsfanmax: I can only predict rational moves, and I thought the most rational move for you would be to give up the horn and focus on building up your defense of Oceania and surrounding areas.
2010-02-23 20:09:28 - Metsfanmax: Not to criticize your play style, but at the end of Round 6 red had 94 troops to your 67, with 9 more troops due per turn. So I didn't think you would make a serious play in South Africa
2010-02-23 22:53:31 - josko.ri: that s because nobody attacked red and you attacked only me. so hoe
2010-02-23 22:54:43 - josko.ri: ...so how could I have more than red in that conditions? I expected that you will cooperate when I attacked red with no-attacking me. finally, it is good for you that me and red attack each other while your troops growing up
2010-02-23 22:58:00 - josko.ri: ...but you attacked me. so I will not be dumb to fight vs red while you crushing me at the same time. how can I survive in that conditions? so I rather choose to eliminate danger from you, and we all now have only one chance if blue attacks red.
2010-02-23 22:59:42 - josko.ri: if not, red will win for sure. I will not be the only who will fight vs him
2010-02-24 05:06:51 - Metsfanmax: So let me get this straight - your strategy is to fight against me while letting another player control the map, and then hope that the third-strongest player will attack him when he doesn't have any
2010-02-24 05:06:55 - Metsfanmax: troops near red?
2010-02-24 11:26:58 - josko.ri: nope. my strategy WAS to fight red and be in peace with you, but you didnt accept that tactics (which was good for you because your troops would grow up while my and red going down)
2010-02-24 11:30:19 - josko.ri: so you forced me to change the tactics. I asked you in chat for no-attacking, I also didnt attack you in tanzania when I could do it 5-1 (round 4), but it wasnt enough that you realize that for you is good tactics to be in peace with me...
2010-02-25 04:09:41 - Metsfanmax: You're lacking global insight on the game; even if I'm "gaining" troops, I'd still be not gaining nearly as many as you, so I wouldn't be a threat.
2010-02-25 04:10:37 - Metsfanmax: It seems to me that you're willing to sacrifice winning chances to defend a subregion you luckily started the game with.
2010-02-26 23:12:12 - josko.ri: uckuki, I thought that you will realize that my no-attacking europe last turn (14-2 when I was on morocco), and letting you +9 bonus with that (6eu+3 western eu) means that I want peace in eu-africa border. but you attacked me at morocco after that
2010-02-26 23:12:41 - josko.ri: so that s why I attacked you in eu this turn
2010-02-27 07:47:36 - uckuki: no problema buddy, do ur thing :)
2010-02-27 07:49:42 - uckuki: in nuclear games, I don't really go for hold-and-build strategy, soon number of troops will start going down, so, I will try to take as many of troops as possible while I still can
2010-03-04 11:44:11 - Moonchild: kralju dmitre zvonimireeeeeeeeee :P
2010-03-24 00:09:52 - uckuki: gg josko
2010-03-25 12:37:25 - josko.ri: gg all :)
|
|||||||
| Conquer Club: play Risk online. Copyright © 2006-2024 by Big Wham LLC | |||||||
