Help
Play States
Play By Clickable Map
Deploy: Click on territory to deploy, choose number to deploy and click again to make deployment
Assault: Click on a territory to Assault from, then on a territory to Assault (right click to Auto Assault)
Advance: Click on conquered territory to choose to advance, choose number to advance, then click again to advance. Click on conquering territory to advance zero.
Reinforce: Click on a territory to Reinforce from, then on a territory to Reinforce to. Click again to confirm.
Play By Keyboard and Mouse
N Key: Skip to next game, Jump to next game
B Key: Begin Turn
E Key: End Deployment, End Assaults, End Reinforcement
L Key: Later (decline to play spoils)
W,S Keys: Increase/decrease troop quantity (slow)
Q,A Keys: Increase/decrease troop quantity (fast)
Mouse Wheel: Change troop quantity by scrolling over the selected region.
CTRL Key + Click: You can always use CTRL-click instead of the right mouse button.
Middle Click: To advance to next stage (Begin Turn, End Assaults, etc.) click the middle mouse button anywhere on the map.
2009-01-06 16:34:55 - jesperrau: OK now ill try to speak to you in hopes of replies from all....
2009-01-06 16:38:48 - jesperrau: im ok with everybody attacking me, thats the fun part of this great game, but it seems wierd to form alliances in a teamgame, and most of all i think its pretty unfair to reveal and share information thats surposed to be kept secret from the "fog of war"
2009-01-06 16:39:52 - jesperrau: please share your thoughts on this, so we can all enjoy this great game of conquer, thanx
2009-01-07 00:00:20 - Egel: almost every double game i played in, teams alliance against the strongest team, so some times it works against you and some times it's in your favour
2009-01-07 00:01:51 - Egel: im not really a fan of it, but it happens, the game stays more fair this way
2009-01-07 00:13:54 - jesperrau: nice to get reply :) but i didnt get the last part... "the game stays more fair this way" does that mean you think its fair to reveal secrets or not ?
2009-01-07 13:48:48 - Bronnen: Same with me, almost every single double game people make alliances
2009-01-07 13:57:24 - jesperrau: oh well if thats the standard i will off course accept that, but still state that i think its awoiding the rules.. but now i know :).... i also know that ill only play games with 2 teams from now on....
2009-01-07 13:58:23 - jesperrau: AND NOW !! lets get this game back on track, im still not caving in... GG everyone
2009-01-07 14:51:02 - Egel: i feel like the game is just beginning
2009-01-07 15:14:31 - Jeff Hardy: cheap tactics
2009-01-07 15:15:52 - Jeff Hardy: giving away peoples position in a fog game is a bitch move
2009-01-07 15:23:32 - roguestate65: I partly agree that it is unfair to reveal opponents positions. If someone is getting too strong you can say something but if you don't say exactly where they are it could be a bluff and it adds to the fun of fog of war and not knowing who to trust.
2009-01-07 16:37:58 - Egel: okay, you're right
2009-01-07 16:38:20 - Egel: some people don't even pay attention to this chat
2009-01-07 16:38:37 - Egel: friends of you jesperrau?
2009-01-07 17:28:13 - jesperrau: what do you mean by "some people don't even pay attention to this chat" ?
2009-01-07 17:31:39 - jesperrau: and yes... jeff´s a friend of mine :) asked him if i was a crybaby for thinking that someone was awoiding the fog of war.... but again, if its normal ill just join games where it can´t happen... 20.000 members = 20.000 views on the rules :)
2009-01-07 20:34:57 - Bronnen: I'm kind of bored with this game right now, so as you can see I have killed myself off.
2009-01-08 07:41:25 - Egel: yeah, you're right, it's lame.. it didn't cross my mind at that time
2009-01-08 07:46:47 - Egel: Fog of War Games: * Using the game chat to announce where a player's territories and troops may (or may not ;) ) be is NOT against the rules. It may come across as unfair or not in the spirit of the game, but feel free to find strategic applications
2009-01-08 07:47:59 - Egel: don't know if anyone actually read the rules, but it's clear now
2009-01-08 11:35:39 - jesperrau: i have read the rules to and couldnt find anything wrong with what you guys did, thats why i tried to speak to your common sense and fairness... if there where no fog of war i wouldnt have said anything
2009-01-08 11:38:22 - jesperrau: and like you said... it might not even be true whats stated in the chat, and that would be even more unfair...
2009-01-08 13:06:34 - Egel: that's all part of the game, i understand your point of view and agree, won't do it again ;)
2009-01-12 17:51:09 - roguestate65: well played team 4
2009-01-12 17:52:51 - roguestate65: yellow, team 4 is going to take this game soon unless you hit them hard, just though you should know
2009-01-12 18:33:04 - jesperrau: well ive known that since you stated to attack me over and over, so cheers to you :)
2009-01-12 18:35:11 - jesperrau: and as i stated earlier in the game chat, i dont like this kind of info from others than my team
2009-01-12 20:28:45 - roguestate65: Right, sorry yellow, how could I be so foolish.
2009-01-12 20:29:09 - roguestate65: Let me rephrase.
2009-01-12 20:34:45 - roguestate65: Attention to no team in particular, if you were to perhaps stumble upon the game log you could perhaps be able to divine that one team may or may not be dominating to such an extent that they will soon win.
2009-01-12 20:36:38 - roguestate65: If you, namely no team in particular, value your chances of winning it may or may not be advisable to target said hypothetical dominating team.
2009-01-12 21:35:34 - jesperrau: for startes.. if you actually believe that i didnt know grey was doing well, you must really think im stupid..
2009-01-12 21:37:21 - jesperrau: second... if you think ill just let you walk all over my teritories, without me using my troops to take regions back, you must think im really stupid.
2009-01-12 21:37:58 - jesperrau: stop caling me stupid. thanx
2009-01-12 21:39:26 - jesperrau: last but not least... if youre such a genius in this game, maybe you should have stopped attacking me, so i could get a desent bonus. and you could have attacked grey...
2009-01-12 21:40:54 - jesperrau: then maybe, and just maybe i would have turned my attention on grey mere than i did. and i would have done it because of good tactics, not because another team wanted me to.
2009-01-12 21:42:53 - jesperrau: il try and say it again..I WILL NOT MAKE ALLIENCES WITH ANYONE IN A TEAMGAME. thats pathetic
2009-01-12 22:10:36 - roguestate65: take it easy, it's a game, it's not personal
2009-01-13 05:04:08 - omnichro: wow yellow umm apparently you're really upset right now so let's all just take some time to calm down and think about things
2009-01-13 09:06:30 - jesperrau: easy guys im not that upset, i just dont understand why rogue tries to point out whois doing well when ive been saying for a long time that i think its wrong to do in a team game... and i dont think its very grown up to patrinice like that when i told -
2009-01-13 09:08:26 - jesperrau: him for the third time.. and especially after most of you almost agread that it shouldnt be done in a team game...
2009-01-13 09:13:35 - jesperrau: capital letters was not screaming, just my point carved in stone :)
2009-01-13 09:19:14 - jesperrau: and we all have our different views on how the game should be played, and were all here to have fun. so ill play you anytime again.. i just know i should go for games with only 2 teams :)
2009-01-13 22:01:05 - Egel: we are curious what you have on sweden Bronnen :p
2009-01-13 22:54:21 - jesperrau: i know now LOL...
2009-01-13 22:57:50 - Egel: lol he left 48 armies on sweden
2009-01-13 22:58:06 - Egel: want to say gg, but i guess you will disagree jesper
2009-01-13 22:58:22 - Egel: gl with your tripples/quadripples!
