0
|
Berlin 1961 - Flat Rate, Fog - Round 87
|
   |
 |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
click to deploy here
click to assault from here
click to assault to here
click to reinforce from here
click to reinforce to here
click to reinforce to here
right-click to reinforce from here
right-click to reinforce from here
click to select/deselect
right-click to play set
right-click to play set
click again to deploy troops
click again to assault
right-click to auto-assault
right-click to auto-assault
click again to advance troops
right-click to advance zero
right-click to advance zero
click to advance zero troops
click again to reinforce troops
click again to reinforce troops
right-click to reinforce from here
right-click to reinforce from here
Statistics
|  |  |  |  |  | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4.9 | 6 | 40 | 182 | 28 | ||
| 4.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Help
Play States
| WAITING | CASH | DEPLOY | ASSAULT | ADVANCE | DEFERRED | REINFORCE | ELIMINATED | VICTORY | |
| Above are the possible play states of a turn. Click on each for a description. Note: the main phases of a turn are DEPLOY, ASSAULT, REINFORCE - other phases occur as they are relevant. | |||||||||
Play By Clickable Map
Deploy: Click on territory to deploy, choose number to deploy and click again to make deploymentAssault: Click on a territory to Assault from, then on a territory to Assault (right click to Auto Assault)
Advance: Click on conquered territory to choose to advance, choose number to advance, then click again to advance. Click on conquering territory to advance zero.
Reinforce: Click on a territory to Reinforce from, then on a territory to Reinforce to. Click again to confirm.
Play By Keyboard and Mouse
N Key: Skip to next game, Jump to next gameB Key: Begin Turn
E Key: End Deployment, End Assaults, End Reinforcement
L Key: Later (decline to play spoils)
W,S Keys: Increase/decrease troop quantity (slow)
Q,A Keys: Increase/decrease troop quantity (fast)
Mouse Wheel: Change troop quantity by scrolling over the selected region.
CTRL Key + Click: You can always use CTRL-click instead of the right mouse button.
Middle Click: To advance to next stage (Begin Turn, End Assaults, etc.) click the middle mouse button anywhere on the map.
- Players
- 5
- Game Type
- Standard
- Slots Per Player
- 1
- Initial Troops
- Automatic
- Play Order
- Sequential
- Spoils
- Flat Rate
- Reinforcements
- Chained
- Fog of War
- Yes
- Trench Warfare
- No
- Round Limit
- None
- Round Length
- 24 Hours
| Players | 5 | |
| Game Type | Standard | In a standard game each player fends for himself and there is only one winner. |
| Initial Troops | Automatic | Regions are randomly distributed at the start of the game and each region starts with three troops. |
| Play Order | Sequential | A player is selected at random to go first and then subsequent players follow in turn. During a team game the play order alternates between the teams. |
| Spoils | Flat Rate | At the end of your turn if you have conquered at least one region you get 'spoils.' Once you have three of the same color (or three different) these can be traded in at the start of your turn for bonus troops. A set of three reds is worth four bonus troops. Three greens is worth six and three blues is worth 8. A set of three different colors is worth ten bonus troops. If you own any of the regions that you trade-in you get two bonus troops on those regions. |
| Reinforcements | Chained | At the end of your turn you can reinforce once from one region to another (they must be connected by regions that you own). |
| Fog of War | Yes | Fog of War masks enemy positions that are not adjacent to your forces (or your team's forces). It also masks region and zone names in the log |
| Trench Warfare | No | You can only assault from regions held since the start of your turn. If you conquer a region during your turn you cannot assault from it until your next turn. |
| Round Limit | None | |
| Round Length | 24 Hours | Each player has up to 24 hours to complete a turn. You will get an email notification when it is your turn to play. |
| Scoring | Regular | Regular leaderboard scoring is in place for this game |
Please see our Game Options Help Page for more details on all the different options.
 | Berlin 1961: | 40 Territories, 6 Continents, Min Reinforcements: 3 |  |
Toggles change the setting temporarily, other settings are saved on a per map basis. For site-wide settings see our Game Settings page.
2008-11-26 03:57:14 - Game has been initialized
2008-12-20 21:56:59 - bamage eliminated Freebyrd1977 from the game
2009-02-10 06:27:37 - bamage eliminated CandaVespin from the game
2009-02-19 16:28:38 - Tommy Tucker eliminated Blobby from the game
2009-02-19 16:31:41 - Tommy Tucker eliminated bamage from the game
2009-02-19 16:31:41 - Tommy Tucker won the game
2009-02-19 16:31:41 - bamage lost 25 points
2009-02-19 16:31:41 - CandaVespin lost 17 points
2009-02-19 16:31:41 - Freebyrd1977 lost 18 points
2009-02-19 16:31:41 - Blobby lost 20 points
2009-02-19 16:31:41 - Tommy Tucker gained 80 points
2008-12-20 21:56:59 - bamage eliminated Freebyrd1977 from the game
2009-02-10 06:27:37 - bamage eliminated CandaVespin from the game
2009-02-19 16:28:38 - Tommy Tucker eliminated Blobby from the game
2009-02-19 16:31:41 - Tommy Tucker eliminated bamage from the game
2009-02-19 16:31:41 - Tommy Tucker won the game
2009-02-19 16:31:41 - bamage lost 25 points
2009-02-19 16:31:41 - CandaVespin lost 17 points
2009-02-19 16:31:41 - Freebyrd1977 lost 18 points
2009-02-19 16:31:41 - Blobby lost 20 points
2009-02-19 16:31:41 - Tommy Tucker gained 80 points
2009-02-10 07:03:31 - Tommy Tucker: That's why I took the initiative and attacked.
2009-02-10 07:04:44 - Tommy Tucker: I was not in suicide mode or anything but decided to make a move. Hence, we can do another game if you like but as far as I'm concerned this game is still on.
2009-02-10 07:05:18 - Tommy Tucker: I will hold off on my go until I hear your comments though...
2009-02-10 12:01:40 - Tommy Tucker: One more tiny point! Bamage, what do you mean by your question to Blobby?
2009-02-10 12:01:50 - Tommy Tucker: "I'm not suggesting Tommy will be opportunistic, but if he does, Blobby, you can play your turn confident that I will follow your lead on how to handle that"
2009-02-10 12:03:17 - Tommy Tucker: Is this an alliance type thing? If so, I refer you back to your earlier comment: bamage: "why wreck everything with alliances? that's how World War 1 started, for pete's sake"
2009-02-10 12:03:49 - Tommy Tucker: And: 2008-12-12 04:04:49 - bamage: "well, i just lost all desire to attack anyone but you two. without extracting any guarantees from anyone, i hope freebyrd and canda agree"
2009-02-10 12:05:02 - Tommy Tucker: In fairness, you have to look at the turn I took and realise that my assumption was that it was game on.
2009-02-10 12:05:38 - Tommy Tucker: As I said, happy to have a re-match but I think we should play this one out (with no alliances!) LOL
2009-02-10 16:38:52 - CandaVespin: I'm all for a rematch. But I really don't feel that we were in a stalemate. SOMEONE had to make a move sooner or later an a victor would emerge.
2009-02-10 16:39:06 - CandaVespin: So... we never tied, someone moved and someone will win.
2009-02-10 17:32:02 - Tommy Tucker: Thanks for that Canda. Let's have a re-match anyway.
2009-02-10 19:34:06 - bamage: 80% of my last 7 comments were poorly thought out -- can we leave it at that? I believe I apologized, Tommy.
2009-02-10 19:35:30 - bamage: So we're doing the rematch with Canda. I'm all for that. How will that rematch affect the outcome of this game? I think we need to be very specific here.
2009-02-10 22:24:43 - CandaVespin: It shouldn't affect it at all.
2009-02-10 22:25:06 - CandaVespin: We got into a position where we were at a multi-round stalemate till someone made a move. One of you three will win. Next game is on it's own merit.
2009-02-10 22:28:40 - bamage: so, rematch plus we're going to play this one out, with no alliances. tommy, go to town. you too blobby.
2009-02-10 23:44:29 - Blobby: OK, I agree with whatever any of you says unless one of you tell me not too :-)
2009-02-10 23:45:21 - Blobby: No really, Tommy, Bamage was not out of line with his comments as far as I see, but I understand where you are coming from
2009-02-10 23:46:47 - Blobby: let's play this one out, and fine with me if you all agree to a rematch.
2009-02-10 23:47:12 - Blobby: I'll set up the game, same as this.
2009-02-11 02:17:03 - Tommy Tucker: Sounds good. Sorry bamage... wasn't meaning to get annoyed. Was just a bit upset as I'd made what I thought was a bold move.
2009-02-11 03:32:34 - Blobby: OK, set up a private 3 player, for quickness did sunny escalating, password poorcanda 4235064 is the game number
2009-02-11 03:33:16 - Blobby: If either of you want to change map or settings, that's fine. (ever the pacifist)
2009-02-11 03:48:29 - bamage: it was a great move tommy. it snatched vistory from the jaws of defeat for everyone but canda. i wished i'd noticed it sooner.
2009-02-11 03:48:38 - bamage: *victory
2009-02-11 04:03:05 - CandaVespin: Bamage, how are 4 people supposed to join a 3 person game exactly?
2009-02-11 04:03:45 - CandaVespin: err... Blobby, not Bamage.
2009-02-11 04:04:16 - Tommy Tucker: That's what I was thinking!!!
2009-02-11 04:52:37 - Blobby: Uuum, I was thinking that the remaining players agree to a tiebreaker. Since, A) you did not quite agree, & B) you were not a remaining player.....
2009-02-11 04:53:37 - Blobby: But I'm up to doing the 4 player, just not what I had in mind, when I sgeested it, you was still the prominent player
2009-02-11 04:54:16 - Blobby: Then you kinda coasted about hoe you woukd win in the long run and didn't agree that a stalemate was needed
2009-02-11 04:55:00 - Blobby: So then Tommy attacked you, and I followed suit, having comne to no decision??????
2009-02-11 04:56:07 - Blobby: Sorry, jus reading what I wrote, my little letters are too close together, I can spell really.
2009-02-11 06:06:39 - CandaVespin: I was hoping to provoke someone, ANYONE into doing something. Eventually, at the status quo, I would have had the army count to win. When all three of you (yes, three of you) jumped on me for the kill....
2009-02-11 06:06:49 - CandaVespin: It was never and never will be a "tie"
2009-02-11 06:07:12 - CandaVespin: But... you're welcome to play your 3. I was willing to play a re-match. NOT a tie-breaker as it wasn't a tie. Still isn't a tie.
2009-02-11 06:07:25 - CandaVespin: Can't have a tie when someone will eventually win.
2009-02-11 14:16:02 - bamage: since we're not doing a winner-take-all that covers both games, and since canda said [2009-02-09 13:32:45 - CandaVespin: THough, I'd be all for a new game. I prefer foggy myself.] I think we should make it a 4-player game.
2009-02-12 23:23:39 - Blobby: OK, that's good with me. Please set it up Bam, and as for this one??? We still play against each other?
2009-02-13 05:16:10 - bamage: absolutely... beat my ass
2009-02-13 05:16:14 - bamage: :-)
2009-02-13 05:17:57 - bamage: erm... dumb question... should i set up an escalating version of this map?
2009-02-13 09:09:11 - Tommy Tucker: I prefer Escalating sunny but happy with whatever!
2009-02-13 22:28:36 - Blobby: Escalating is normally a surer way to avoid a stalemate, I;m fine with it, sunny or fog
2009-02-17 14:29:45 - bamage: leavng that stack there made no sense
2009-02-17 14:30:07 - bamage: imo
2009-02-19 16:27:49 - bamage: gg tommy, well-done
2009-02-19 16:31:35 - Tommy Tucker: Thanks bamage... well played. Look forward to the re-match....
2009-02-19 16:32:02 - Tommy Tucker: gg Blobby....
2009-02-10 07:04:44 - Tommy Tucker: I was not in suicide mode or anything but decided to make a move. Hence, we can do another game if you like but as far as I'm concerned this game is still on.
2009-02-10 07:05:18 - Tommy Tucker: I will hold off on my go until I hear your comments though...
2009-02-10 12:01:40 - Tommy Tucker: One more tiny point! Bamage, what do you mean by your question to Blobby?
2009-02-10 12:01:50 - Tommy Tucker: "I'm not suggesting Tommy will be opportunistic, but if he does, Blobby, you can play your turn confident that I will follow your lead on how to handle that"
2009-02-10 12:03:17 - Tommy Tucker: Is this an alliance type thing? If so, I refer you back to your earlier comment: bamage: "why wreck everything with alliances? that's how World War 1 started, for pete's sake"
2009-02-10 12:03:49 - Tommy Tucker: And: 2008-12-12 04:04:49 - bamage: "well, i just lost all desire to attack anyone but you two. without extracting any guarantees from anyone, i hope freebyrd and canda agree"
2009-02-10 12:05:02 - Tommy Tucker: In fairness, you have to look at the turn I took and realise that my assumption was that it was game on.
2009-02-10 12:05:38 - Tommy Tucker: As I said, happy to have a re-match but I think we should play this one out (with no alliances!) LOL
2009-02-10 16:38:52 - CandaVespin: I'm all for a rematch. But I really don't feel that we were in a stalemate. SOMEONE had to make a move sooner or later an a victor would emerge.
2009-02-10 16:39:06 - CandaVespin: So... we never tied, someone moved and someone will win.
2009-02-10 17:32:02 - Tommy Tucker: Thanks for that Canda. Let's have a re-match anyway.
2009-02-10 19:34:06 - bamage: 80% of my last 7 comments were poorly thought out -- can we leave it at that? I believe I apologized, Tommy.
2009-02-10 19:35:30 - bamage: So we're doing the rematch with Canda. I'm all for that. How will that rematch affect the outcome of this game? I think we need to be very specific here.
2009-02-10 22:24:43 - CandaVespin: It shouldn't affect it at all.
2009-02-10 22:25:06 - CandaVespin: We got into a position where we were at a multi-round stalemate till someone made a move. One of you three will win. Next game is on it's own merit.
2009-02-10 22:28:40 - bamage: so, rematch plus we're going to play this one out, with no alliances. tommy, go to town. you too blobby.
2009-02-10 23:44:29 - Blobby: OK, I agree with whatever any of you says unless one of you tell me not too :-)
2009-02-10 23:45:21 - Blobby: No really, Tommy, Bamage was not out of line with his comments as far as I see, but I understand where you are coming from
2009-02-10 23:46:47 - Blobby: let's play this one out, and fine with me if you all agree to a rematch.
2009-02-10 23:47:12 - Blobby: I'll set up the game, same as this.
2009-02-11 02:17:03 - Tommy Tucker: Sounds good. Sorry bamage... wasn't meaning to get annoyed. Was just a bit upset as I'd made what I thought was a bold move.
2009-02-11 03:32:34 - Blobby: OK, set up a private 3 player, for quickness did sunny escalating, password poorcanda 4235064 is the game number
2009-02-11 03:33:16 - Blobby: If either of you want to change map or settings, that's fine. (ever the pacifist)
2009-02-11 03:48:29 - bamage: it was a great move tommy. it snatched vistory from the jaws of defeat for everyone but canda. i wished i'd noticed it sooner.
2009-02-11 03:48:38 - bamage: *victory
2009-02-11 04:03:05 - CandaVespin: Bamage, how are 4 people supposed to join a 3 person game exactly?
2009-02-11 04:03:45 - CandaVespin: err... Blobby, not Bamage.
2009-02-11 04:04:16 - Tommy Tucker: That's what I was thinking!!!
2009-02-11 04:52:37 - Blobby: Uuum, I was thinking that the remaining players agree to a tiebreaker. Since, A) you did not quite agree, & B) you were not a remaining player.....
2009-02-11 04:53:37 - Blobby: But I'm up to doing the 4 player, just not what I had in mind, when I sgeested it, you was still the prominent player
2009-02-11 04:54:16 - Blobby: Then you kinda coasted about hoe you woukd win in the long run and didn't agree that a stalemate was needed
2009-02-11 04:55:00 - Blobby: So then Tommy attacked you, and I followed suit, having comne to no decision??????
2009-02-11 04:56:07 - Blobby: Sorry, jus reading what I wrote, my little letters are too close together, I can spell really.
2009-02-11 06:06:39 - CandaVespin: I was hoping to provoke someone, ANYONE into doing something. Eventually, at the status quo, I would have had the army count to win. When all three of you (yes, three of you) jumped on me for the kill....
2009-02-11 06:06:49 - CandaVespin: It was never and never will be a "tie"
2009-02-11 06:07:12 - CandaVespin: But... you're welcome to play your 3. I was willing to play a re-match. NOT a tie-breaker as it wasn't a tie. Still isn't a tie.
2009-02-11 06:07:25 - CandaVespin: Can't have a tie when someone will eventually win.
2009-02-11 14:16:02 - bamage: since we're not doing a winner-take-all that covers both games, and since canda said [2009-02-09 13:32:45 - CandaVespin: THough, I'd be all for a new game. I prefer foggy myself.] I think we should make it a 4-player game.
2009-02-12 23:23:39 - Blobby: OK, that's good with me. Please set it up Bam, and as for this one??? We still play against each other?
2009-02-13 05:16:10 - bamage: absolutely... beat my ass
2009-02-13 05:16:14 - bamage: :-)
2009-02-13 05:17:57 - bamage: erm... dumb question... should i set up an escalating version of this map?
2009-02-13 09:09:11 - Tommy Tucker: I prefer Escalating sunny but happy with whatever!
2009-02-13 22:28:36 - Blobby: Escalating is normally a surer way to avoid a stalemate, I;m fine with it, sunny or fog
2009-02-17 14:29:45 - bamage: leavng that stack there made no sense
2009-02-17 14:30:07 - bamage: imo
2009-02-19 16:27:49 - bamage: gg tommy, well-done
2009-02-19 16:31:35 - Tommy Tucker: Thanks bamage... well played. Look forward to the re-match....
2009-02-19 16:32:02 - Tommy Tucker: gg Blobby....
|
|||||||
| Conquer Club: play Risk online. Copyright © 2006-2024 by Big Wham LLC | |||||||
