UK Politics opinion poll (June 2009)
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 2:07 pm
Just a opinion poll, it's okay if you are not a citizen of the UK and want to cast your vote but i based this thread primarily for citizens of the UK.
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://rc.conquerclub.com/forum/
and i haven't even cast a vote yetjoecoolfrog wrote:Very very sad that anybody could vote for the Nazi BNP
mod editjoecoolfrog wrote:Very very sad that anybody could vote for the Nazi BNP
nice spotSimon Viavant wrote:Hi norse, how've you been doing lately?
Remind me again why everybody wanted to free Norse?barnabus wrote:I've never read so much bollocks.Genghis Khant wrote:
High levels of immigration is the price we pay, or indeed the debt we owe, for centuries of imperialism. That's not to say that we should have an open border policy, but rather to point out that we have no moral high ground on this issue. If we hadn't grown so rich by exploiting their mineral & agricultural resources, by conscripting, enlisting or enslaving their people, and if we hadn't imposed the English language on them, then the UK would not be as attractive a destination for economic migrants as it is today. Also, let's not forget that immigration was actively encouraged after the second world war to solve labour shortages, particularly in the healthcare sector.
'We' is a very selective, all-embracing term. Has your family ever profited, exploited or taken advantage of the misery of others? Mine certainly has never. Oh? what is that I can hear you say?
"Oh, butz, liek da GUVAMENT was LIKE WACIIST And like gots like slaves and made dem well unhappy and like gotz muny I HATE DA QUEEN she is a howwible woman, teh brits are wacist and like make people wiv black skin like slaves cvos dey MAKE MONEY!!! "
NO YOU FUCKING IDIOT. Just because some financial organisation that was based within Britain during the time of the slave trade made a monetary gain from the slave trade (Llyods Bank to name but one) this does not mean that any regular citizens owe any kind of debt whatsoever to anyone.
The only reason that England was a particularly industrious nation was down to the industrious attitudes of those that worked there - what the f*ck has the Industrial revolution creating, Free-market pioneering and empircal exploration of 19th century Britain got to do with a few fuckin cotton-picking bruvvas? DO you honestly believe that we wo0uld not have invented the steam-train had some of our financial organisations not been a part of financially backing shipping these ready-to-sell (ready to sell for their own peoples gain - who funnily enough were the ones who were selling them, you prick) Africans to some yokels in the southern US states?
Are you really that fucking thick?
Yeah! because every wave of somalian, albanian and Turkish immigration brings such technological and cultural delights such as the...... erm.........hmmmmm...... did they invent the knife?...nah, they just use them quite alot on other people.... erm.. ....protsitution surely?... dunno about that actually, but they seem to ship them over here pretty quickly......erm... howabout piracy?...no, dude, that's been around for centuries ..... howabout all the skills they have? Ahh yes, the somalis certainly have a skill for doing absolutely f*ck all, whilst those horrible racist middle classed capitalist workers are out making dirty money to subsidise the existence of them - probably working for a racism company or sumfink, or dealing on slave trading stocks...... ahh but the turks make a good kebab!British history is shaped by immigration. Each wave bringing with it new ideas, new technology, art, culture, skills. The largest immigrant population came here after the Romans left and brought with them violence, feudalism, paganism, arrogance and misguided feelings of superiority.
Bingo! They bring kebabs to this country - what else could us racist, imperialistic brits want for the billions of wasted tax revenue?
And, you bitter fucking taffy - yes the saxons came in 400AD - paganism was already present within Britain at the time - christianity hadnt reached the shores by then en-masse. You know the reason why you're called welsh? Because that was the old saxon term for a foreigner - you were inadequate at saving your own country, and we inherited it from you obviously useless, inbred whining, decrepit sheep shaggers.
See ya boyo!
I didn't, went with SNP but may I ask what are your problems with labour specifally? I am still a wee bit on the fence. Being 18 I am not exactly deep into politics but as far as I see it peoples problems with labour are:Minister Masket wrote:Which thick-eared dolt voted for Labour?
A statement which says more about your reading habits & cognitive ability than it does about my writing.barnabus wrote:I've never read so much bollocks.
Make your mind up. Is it selective, or all-embracing?barnabus wrote:'We' is a very selective, all-embracing term.
Yes. My father is a lawyer.barnabus wrote:Has your family ever profited, exploited or taken advantage of the misery of others?
Very little, thankfully, since we abolished slavery in 1807.barnabus wrote:what the f*ck has the Industrial revolution creating, Free-market pioneering and empircal exploration of 19th century Britain got to do with a few fuckin cotton-picking bruvvas?
The Somalis brought us khat, while the Turkish gave us kebabs, houmous, falafels and St George.barnabus wrote:Yeah! because every wave of somalian, albanian and Turkish immigration brings such technological and cultural delights such as the ... kebab!
Absolute tripe. The name comes from the merging of Punjab, Afghan Frontier, Kashmir & Baluchistan - the predominantly Muslim regions at the time of independence.norse wrote:
Yes, but do you know what the suffix 'stan' means? In means 'land of..' if my memory serves me correctly. So Pakistan, for instance means 'Land of the Pakis', as this was the tribal name for the group of people who inhabited this area at the time of naming.
Irony? Read a history book or an encyclopaedia and see for yourself.barnabus wrote:Though, I think this is a very good stab at ironyGenghis Khant wrote:Absolute tripe. The name comes from the merging of Punjab, Afghan Frontier, Kashmir & Baluchistan - the predominantly Muslim regions at the time of independence.norse wrote:
Yes, but do you know what the suffix 'stan' means? In means 'land of..' if my memory serves me correctly. So Pakistan, for instance means 'Land of the Pakis', as this was the tribal name for the group of people who inhabited this area at the time of naming.
EDIT: and where in blazes have all these UKIP supporters come from?
That's because wiki so often proves you wrong.barnabus wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/-stan
Hate using wiki as references.
Correct about the tribal name? Surely not.Norse wrote:But it also proves me right by the point I made with regards to -stan being a suffix meaning 'land of'. So effectively my point remains, and I am yet again correct.Snorri1234 wrote:That's because wiki so often proves you wrong.Norse wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/-stan
Hate using wiki as references.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan
Norse wrote:Pakistan, for instance means 'Land of the Pakis', as this was the tribal name for the group of people who inhabited this area at the time of naming.
Yeah if we had taken any issue with your statement that -stan means land of you would totally have us there.barnabus wrote:But it also proves me right by the point I made with regards to -stan being a prefix meaning 'land of'. So effectively my point remains, and I am yet again correct.Snorri1234 wrote:That's because wiki so often proves you wrong.barnabus wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/-stan
Hate using wiki as references.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan
What larger point? We already knew that -stan meant "land of". That wasn't even a point. I mean, shit, are you proud or something that you knew some definition of a word?barnabus wrote:Not really - it was a poor example, but the main point was utterly correct, meaning that i lost on a small, pedantic point, and won the larger point, meaning I win.Snorri1234 wrote:Yeah if we had taken any issue with your statement that -stan means land of you would totally have us there.barnabus wrote:But it also proves me right by the point I made with regards to -stan being a prefix meaning 'land of'. So effectively my point remains, and I am yet again correct.Snorri1234 wrote:That's because wiki so often proves you wrong.barnabus wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/-stan
Hate using wiki as references.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan
But since we didn't you just lost.
What d'ya think about that snotti?
You must be very proud that you didn't poop your pants today.barnabus wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:
What larger point? We already knew that -stan meant "land of". That wasn't even a point. I mean, shit, are you proud or something that you knew some definition of a word?
Congratulations on not utterly failing at life, I guess.
Uh oh...sounds like someone is getting their panties in a twistI'm very proud about my understanding of suffixes..it is something I take very seriously. You quite correctly point out that this one factor alone is tantamount to my esteem.
Where would we be in a if we did do not know the meanings of words?