Conquer Club

• Changes the rules as to what is considered flaming from:

Flames are posts or parts of posts which, directly or indirectly, insult, belittle, bully, name-call, or otherwise attack another user.

Flames are posts or parts of posts which, directly or indirectly, insult, belittle, bully, name-call, or otherwise attack someone or something.

• Wait! What?! You have got to be kidding with that definition.
• Under the definition of what flaming is... (in the following lines, the word "flaming" means simply "directly or indirectly, insult, belittle, bully, name-call, or otherwise attack"):
  • Flaming CC is okay?
  • Flaming the dice is okay?
  • Flaming the changes CC made is okay?
  • Flaming the new 'Peace & Love' Forum is okay?
  • Flaming white people is okay? (since the guidelines only speak of minorities)
  • Flaming the Chinese is okay? (since they consist of almost a third of the world's population, they are not a minority either)
  • Flaming a country is okay?
  • Flaming a state/city is okay?
  • Flaming a banned member is okay? (since they are no longer "users")
• Under your definition, I could say all of those things with no consequence if you follow by your rules since I am not breaking any. The site's definition of flaming does not encompass any of that since none of that is directed at a user, therefore not flaming.

• Make the rules say what you mean.
• Give justification to bans.

sailorseal wrote:Well if by this spam you mean update the community guidelines then yes

blakebowling wrote:

sailorseal wrote:Well if by this spam you mean update the community guidelines then yes

How is this spam? He made a clear suggestion.. and you agree with it yourself.