tnb80, i am having issues with my computer, i will let you know when the files are uploaded properlythenobodies80 wrote:I noticed it, infact I've deleted the PM....just I posted here before to check them...
Cairnswk can you fix the big version since it's smaller.Blurriness is for that reason DiM. When he exported the file probably resized it.
Thanks
TRAFALGAR [12.4.2012] QUENCHED (V65)
Moderator: Cartographers
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Re: TRAFALGAR [24.2.2012] BETA (V65)

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
Re: TRAFALGAR [27.2.2012] BETA (V65)
Britannia starts with 3Neutral Starts:
Weather Line Intermediary Vessels - 7 (each 3)
Victory Bow and Stern (each 3)
Bucentaure Bow and Stern (each 3)
Santissima Trinidad Bow and Stern (each 3)
Spartiate and Britannia (each 2)
--------------------------------
Lee Line Intermediary Vessels - 21 (each 3)
Royal Sovereign Bow and Stern (each 3)
Algesiras Bow and Stern (each 3)
Principe De Asturias (each 3)
Orion starts with 2
San Augustin starts with 2
although Spartiate is correct as 2
Re: TRAFALGAR [27 Oct 2011] BETA (V63)
Green oaks i think this was the change back here...i'll rectify the front pagegreenoaks wrote:Britannia starts with 3Neutral Starts:
Weather Line Intermediary Vessels - 7 (each 3)
Victory Bow and Stern (each 3)
Bucentaure Bow and Stern (each 3)
Santissima Trinidad Bow and Stern (each 3)
Spartiate and Britannia (each 2)
--------------------------------
Lee Line Intermediary Vessels - 21 (each 3)
Royal Sovereign Bow and Stern (each 3)
Algesiras Bow and Stern (each 3)
Principe De Asturias (each 3)
Orion starts with 2
San Augustin starts with 2
although Spartiate is correct as 2
iancanton wrote:sorry for the delay, cairns.+5 BW and +5 FW (with the rest as given above) is what i actually have in mind, since both look easier bonuses than +6 FL. however, we can by all means try +6 BW and +6 FW first if u think it more fitting: my main concern here is to equalise the attractiveness of BW against FW, with the FL comparison being secondary because there's less interplay between FL and either BW or FW.cairnswk wrote:so you want
6 BW
6 FW
3 SW
8 BL
6 FL
7 SL
with flagship neutrals to remain as 3.
and neutral 2s on Bellerophon, Orion, San Augustin as the balancing vessels
ian.

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
Re: TRAFALGAR [27.2.2012] BETA (V65)
i wasn't sure if it was the map or the 1st post that was out and with 56 pages of discussion ................
btw i like the altered attack line for the british across the top to make it easier to move to the french/spanish ships
btw i like the altered attack line for the british across the top to make it easier to move to the french/spanish ships
Re: TRAFALGAR [27.2.2012] BETA (V65)
np.greenoaks wrote:i wasn't sure if it was the map or the 1st post that was out and with 56 pages of discussion ................
btw i like the altered attack line for the british across the top to make it easier to move to the french/spanish ships

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
Re: TRAFALGAR [24.2.2012] BETA (V65)
Files for upload
Small Centering

Large Centering Small Image

Large Image http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... _V65Sx.png
http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... _V65Lx.png
http://www.peeje.com/files/359924549/_Trafalgar_V65.xml
Small Centering

Large Centering Small Image

Large Image http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... _V65Sx.png
http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... _V65Lx.png
http://www.peeje.com/files/359924549/_Trafalgar_V65.xml
Last edited by cairnswk on Fri Mar 09, 2012 8:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
Re: TRAFALGAR [2.3.2012] BETA (V65)
Can I just say how much I enjoy this map, except for the m*$)%ing territs with duplicate names? Jeebus, that's a pain in the arse. Yes, I know there's a little (B) or (F) or whatever on the dupes, and historical accuracy is important, but is that really a good thing? Especially if you don't use BOB?
Re: TRAFALGAR [2.3.2012] BETA (V65)
I wouldn't disagree with that. It would be nice if their were no duplicates.Gormbroc wrote:Can I just say how much I enjoy this map, except for the m*$)%ing territs with duplicate names? Jeebus, that's a pain in the arse. Yes, I know there's a little (B) or (F) or whatever on the dupes, and historical accuracy is important, but is that really a good thing? Especially if you don't use BOB?
- thenobodies80
- Posts: 5400
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:30 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Milan
Re: TRAFALGAR [2.3.2012] BETA (V65)
I don't know what happened but there're a couple of things to improve on the small version before to upload the files:
Left legend, why the titles (the black text in general) are now so bright?

Again on the left side, "the king's victory" and "vive l'empereur!" are unreadable

Thanks
Nobodies
Left legend, why the titles (the black text in general) are now so bright?

Again on the left side, "the king's victory" and "vive l'empereur!" are unreadable

Thanks
Nobodies
Re: TRAFALGAR [2.3.2012] BETA (V65)
...upsized!Some pages back (and i don't have time to search for it, there was a reqauest that someone couldn't read these headings properly. But this is well back. So they were strengthened in colour. The red behind British is now the same red that applies to the "The King's Victory", but obviously that would hideous on the map, so the map is the colour that it was several eonsthenobodies80 wrote:I don't know what happened but there're a couple of things to improve on the small version before to upload the files:
Left legend, why the titles (the black text in general) are now so bright?
ago.
Again on the left side, "the king's victory" and "vive l'empereur!" are unreadable
Thanks![]()
Nobodies
Changes are made to files above.

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
- thenobodies80
- Posts: 5400
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:30 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Milan
Re: TRAFALGAR [10.3.2012] BETA (V65)
Cairnswk, the turtle can't upload the xml because this link --> http://www.peeje.com/files/359924549/_Trafalgar_V65.xml you provided doesn't work.
Can you post a working link for your xml?
Thank you!
Nobodies
Can you post a working link for your xml?
Thank you!
Nobodies
Re: TRAFALGAR [10.3.2012] BETA (V65)
Sorry about that tnb80.thenobodies80 wrote:Cairnswk, the turtle can't upload the xml because this link --> http://www.peeje.com/files/359924549/_Trafalgar_V65.xml you provided doesn't work.
Can you post a working link for your xml?
Thank you!
Nobodies
As an attached file below.
- Attachments
-
- _Trafalgar_V65.xml
- (36.11 KiB) Downloaded 1207 times

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
- thenobodies80
- Posts: 5400
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:30 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Milan
Re: TRAFALGAR [10.3.2012] BETA (V65)
I've sent the files again! 
- thenobodies80
- Posts: 5400
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:30 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Milan
Re: TRAFALGAR [10.3.2012] BETA (V65)
Updated! 
- thenobodies80
- Posts: 5400
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:30 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Milan
Re: TRAFALGAR [10.3.2012] BETA (V65)
cairnswk, what are your thoughts with the new connection? And what about the duplicate name?
As soon as we're sure that everything works in the right way I would like to quench this one.
As soon as we're sure that everything works in the right way I would like to quench this one.
Re: TRAFALGAR [10.3.2012] BETA (V65)
on the new connection....it was asked for a given, and even though there have been no comments i am sure we would have heard by now if this had caused major issue.thenobodies80 wrote:cairnswk, what are your thoughts with the new connection? And what about the duplicate name?
As soon as we're sure that everything works in the right way I would like to quench this one.
on the duplicate names...there are only two, they are two different colours, and some distance apart...at some time i beleive that even with situation being of historical nature, players must also take some responsibility to examine what they are doing to ascertain the difference between the two duplicates.
I am happy to leave things as is, unless there is a hurricane force for change.

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
Re: TRAFALGAR [10.3.2012] BETA (V65)

How about now?
.
Re: TRAFALGAR [10.3.2012] BETA (V65)
^^^^


* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
- thenobodies80
- Posts: 5400
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:30 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Milan
Re: TRAFALGAR [10.3.2012] BETA (V65)
- Quenching
Congratulations cairnswk, your shiny new medal is well-earned
Conquer Club, enjoy!
- koontz1973
- Posts: 6960
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:57 am
Re: TRAFALGAR [10.3.2012] BETA (V65)
^^^^ thanks you tnb80 and thanks you koontz1973 

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
Re: TRAFALGAR [10.3.2012] BETA (V65)
Now, there is only one thing left to change... edit the title!
Re: TRAFALGAR [10.3.2012] BETA (V65)
??chapcrap wrote:Now, there is only one thing left to change... edit the title!

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
Re: TRAFALGAR [10.3.2012] BETA (V65)
It's not BETA anymore!!cairnswk wrote:??chapcrap wrote:Now, there is only one thing left to change... edit the title!
Re: TRAFALGAR [10.3.2012] BETA (V65)
chapcrap wrote:It's not BETA anymore!!cairnswk wrote:??chapcrap wrote:Now, there is only one thing left to change... edit the title!

* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi



