Crusades

strike wolf · Post by **strike wolf** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 11:01 am

You didn't anounce your 100th post in the Israel subject.

strike wolf · Post by **strike wolf** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 11:01 am

I refuse to comment on that because i don't support either side.

Caleb the Cruel · Post by **Caleb the Cruel** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 11:02 am

i don't care that i've had 100 posts as 73 of them were wasted on discussions with you

strike wolf · Post by **strike wolf** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 11:04 am

they weren't wasted. I've quite enjoyed the mindless arguing. It's the only reason I bother replying sometimes.

Caleb the Cruel · Post by **Caleb the Cruel** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 11:09 am

lol, me too

jay_a2j · Post by **jay_a2j** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 11:10 am

ok you two... 20 paces at sundown.

strike wolf · Post by **strike wolf** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 11:17 am

Caleb the Cruel wrote:lol, me too

You're not supposed to agree with me.

Willgfass · Post by **Willgfass** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 5:45 pm

if it wasn't one of the crusades, the ottoman empire wouldn't of killed christian after christian in europe. and the byzantine empire wouldn't of died as quickly. i'm greek so this may be a little biased but it would be constantinople not istanbul which is a really bad name

Caleb the Cruel · Post by **Caleb the Cruel** » Sat Jul 22, 2006 1:28 pm

strike wolf wrote:
Caleb the Cruel wrote:lol, me too
You're not supposed to agree with me.

oh, sorry

Caleb the Cruel · Post by **Caleb the Cruel** » Sat Jul 22, 2006 1:29 pm

Willgfass wrote:if it wasn't one of the crusades, the ottoman empire wouldn't of killed christian after christian in europe. and the byzantine empire wouldn't of died as quickly. i'm greek so this may be a little biased but it would be constantinople not istanbul which is a really bad name

explain better please... it could be how you said it that i didn't grasp it entirely, or it could be this white stuff i'm sniffing

strike wolf · Post by **strike wolf** » Sat Jul 22, 2006 2:21 pm

Willgfass wrote:if it wasn't one of the crusades, the ottoman empire wouldn't of killed christian after christian in europe. and the byzantine empire wouldn't of died as quickly. i'm greek so this may be a little biased but it would be constantinople not istanbul which is a really bad name

from my limited knowledge that does sound biased.

Knight of Orient · Post by **Knight of Orient** » Sun Jul 23, 2006 5:38 pm

there was a crusade in which the crusaders were goin to aid the holy land. they ran out of money at venice cause of its doge dandolo. in the end he persuaded them to attack constantinople as a way of payment and conquest. they sacked it through a series of backstabbings and other events and a frankish king was put on the throne. lotsa wealth was taken from the once richest city in possibly the world, and it never came back to power. the end

Knight of Orient · Post by **Knight of Orient** » Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:17 pm

did that make sense?

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:19 pm

jay_a2j wrote:ok you two... 20 paces at sundown.

Legalized dueling... one thing I can agree with you on...

you call yourself pro life..

Legalized dueling is as pro choice as it comes.