Not sure I really understand the question, but you can always conquer that region from the Landing Point.ogro wrote:Thank you for your New World map. I enjoy it a lot.
Talking about strategy: How is possible for a player to avoid bombing from Europe to colonies?
I will appreciate your answer.
Regards... and congratulations for the map.
The New World [Quenched]
Moderator: Cartographers
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
-
nolefan5311
- Posts: 1768
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:51 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Florida
Re: The New World [Quenched]
-
Teflon Kris
- Posts: 4236
- Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 4:39 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Lancashire, United Kingdom
Re: The New World [Quenched]
Aha !
"+1 for 2 territories within an empire"
"Homelands bombards any other territories within their empire"
Put these together and, by logic, which nobody (except some women arguing) can deny, homelands and landing bases are in the same empire.
therefore their is either a mistake on the map explanation, or in the xml, for thre not to be a +1 bonus for this.
Logically.
"+1 for 2 territories within an empire"
"Homelands bombards any other territories within their empire"
Put these together and, by logic, which nobody (except some women arguing) can deny, homelands and landing bases are in the same empire.
therefore their is either a mistake on the map explanation, or in the xml, for thre not to be a +1 bonus for this.
Logically.
-
gimil
- Posts: 8599
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)
Re: The New World [Quenched]
Sorry I don't think I understand what you mean?DJ Teflon wrote:Aha !
"+1 for 2 territories within an empire"
"Homelands bombards any other territories within their empire"
Put these together and, by logic, which nobody (except some women arguing) can deny, homelands and landing bases are in the same empire.
therefore their is either a mistake on the map explanation, or in the xml, for thre not to be a +1 bonus for this.
Logically.
What do you know about map making, bitch?
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
-
Teflon Kris
- Posts: 4236
- Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 4:39 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Lancashire, United Kingdom
Re: The New World [Quenched]
Homelands and landing bases are in the same empire, so, according to the map information, that is a +1 bonus.
Therefore there is either a mistake on the map explanation, or in the xml, for there not to be a +1 bonus for this (which there isnt).
Only a problem for new players on the map, and most folks would agree that +4 auto and +3 auto is enough bonus for homeland and landing site, no need for the other +1 that the mao text states.
Therefore there is either a mistake on the map explanation, or in the xml, for there not to be a +1 bonus for this (which there isnt).
Only a problem for new players on the map, and most folks would agree that +4 auto and +3 auto is enough bonus for homeland and landing site, no need for the other +1 that the mao text states.
-
jbenavides333
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2020 6:30 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Peru
Re: The New World [Quenched]
The South American map could be more historically accurate. The "Mapuche" area has nothing to do with reality. It would be better called "Inca", although still it wouldn't correspond to the real area. The southern "Dutch" area is also an invention. It would be more appropriately called "Inca outposts" or something to that matter (maybe "Patagonia").