Vampire Mafia- Abandoned :(

[cena-rules]

A double voter almost guarantees that someone else has no vote at all, so Falko is officially not cleared, IMO.

I want to vote either CW or Falko, but I'm not sure which I think is scummier

Alright, I'll try to use naxus's technique to deduce the no-voter.
Here is Falko's original bandwagon:

ACTUALLY THE OFFICIAL AND PROPER Vote Count!

falko 7 - (suspect, skittles, fircoal, stroop, cowboyz, medefe. squirrel, cena)


With 15 alive it's 8 to lynch.

The above is correct to the best of my knowledge.

This vote count clears me, medefe, cowboyz, and suspect (since GEQ replaced him).

Vote Count!

Stroop (1) - naxus
CW (5) - Falko, stroke, e_i_pi, Fuzzy
naxus (1) - cowboyz
e_i_pi (1) - MeDeFe
cowboyz (1) - squirrel
fuzzy (1) - CW
MeDeFe (1) - GEQ

Don't blame me if its wrong, but credit me if it's right!

This one clears ficoal:

Vote Count!
walrus 1- (falko)
falko 3- (suspect, fircoal, cowboyz)

With 15 alive it's 8 to lynch.

Deadline is soon so hurry up peeps.

This one clears skittles:

Vote Count!
walrus 1- (falko)
falko 1- (suspect)
masterchief 1- (naxus)
mr squirrel 1- (skittles)

With 15 alive it's 8 to lynch.

DEADLINE 48 HOURS!!!!!!

This one clears cena:

Deadline may be extened for replacements.

Vote Count!
strokem 1- (cena)
walrus 1- (falko)
falko 1- (suspect)
masterchief 1- (naxus)
mr squirrel 1- (skittles)
no lynch 2- (e_i_pi)

With 15 alive it's 8 to lynch.

SEAsportsfan and masterchief are being replaced

Fixed.

And this one clears stroop:

Vote count!
skittles 2- (stroke, SEA)
stroop 1- (mr. squirrel)
cowboyz 1- (naxus)
suspect- 1 (stroop)
cena 1- (fuzzy)

With 15 alive it's 8 to lynch.

Well, thats all 8 players on the bandwagon. So unless Pmc got one of those votes wrong, we can assume that Falko was telling the truth. If there is a voteless townie, he would have to be someone else who didn't jump on the bandwagon.

Well logiced out. Ok, so falko is cleared.

[strokem1257]

Well logiced out. Ok, so falko is cleared.

leaving CW as a prime suspect....

[captainwalrus]

Didn't e_i_pi already claim to be double voting?
Whatever.
What makes people think that I am mafia?

[Stroop]

CW it is then.

What makes people think that I am mafia?

I'll try to make a nice and proper case tomorrow morning

[e_i_pi]

Didn't e_i_pi already claim to be double voting?
Whatever.
What makes people think that I am mafia?

I made a case against you, it was a few posts before your scum buddies MeDeFe and cena started gasbagging about finding a voteless townie to draw attention away from your scumminess

[Stroop]

CW it is then.

What makes people think that I am mafia?

I'll try to make a nice and proper case tomorrow morning

I should have known not to promise things like this... my nice and proper case will have to wait.

Meanwhile this post by cowboyz and this post by e_i_pi sum up a few good reasons to lynch CW.

[Crazyirishman]

Maybe the voteless townie could have two votes the next turn?

[MeDeFe]

Didn't e_i_pi already claim to be double voting?
Whatever.
What makes people think that I am mafia?

I made a case against you, it was a few posts before your scum buddies MeDeFe and cena started gasbagging about finding a voteless townie to draw attention away from your scumminess

e_i_pi, you're giving me a headache with your accusations, and not because they're factual (because they aren't) but because there's no good reason for them. I said to find the voteless townie so we could confirm whether Falko's claim was correct or not as well as reduce the list of suspects by one. If you feel that detracts from your campaign (no matter how strong a case you may or may not have) against CW, well, I'm soo sorry for you. I'm not going to go along with everyone else's lines of reasoning if I see a possibility to get the town closer to winning, but instead put my ideas and methods up for debate.

[captainwalrus]

CW it is then.

What makes people think that I am mafia?

I'll try to make a nice and proper case tomorrow morning

I should have known not to promise things like this... my nice and proper case will have to wait.

Meanwhile this post by cowboyz and this post by e_i_pi sum up a few good reasons to lynch CW.

Cowboyz only real argument was that I was too lucky in picking naxus. Other than that he just said that we should lynch me since we have a lynch to waste and it would conferm or deny other stories. That is a terrible reason to lynch a bulletproof bodygaurd.

e_i_pi I already responded to.

The only real argument is that I seem too lucky in picking naxus.

[Mr. Squirrel]

CW it is then.

What makes people think that I am mafia?

I'll try to make a nice and proper case tomorrow morning

I should have known not to promise things like this... my nice and proper case will have to wait.

Meanwhile this post by cowboyz and this post by e_i_pi sum up a few good reasons to lynch CW.

Cowboyz only real argument was that I was too lucky in picking naxus. Other than that he just said that we should lynch me since we have a lynch to waste and it would conferm or deny other stories. That is a terrible reason to lynch a bulletproof bodygaurd.

e_i_pi I already responded to.

The only real argument is that I seem too lucky in picking naxus.

I think I already said my thoughts on those accusations earlier. I have to say, I'm not convinced. I have to admit that he is a little scummy but your case seems too weak for my liking. He claims to be a bulletproof bodyguard. To lose him would be a major loss for the town. I would like to see more evidence against CW before anyone else places a vote against him. Anyone who votes at this point is just bandwagoning for the sake of it.

And cowboy's idea that we have a mislynch to use is retarded. Just because we didn't lose anyone day 1 doesn't mean we should be careless day two, or any day for that matter.

And also unvote since we are no longer doing the vote experiment.

[strokem1257]

uh... has anyone else noticed that we have a few lurkers... I say we lynch one of them.
one of which is skittles who hasn't posted since like the beginning of day one... He seems to be active in several other forums/threads though.
another is the noob naxus who said he doesn't have much to input a while back. all he seems to contribute is long lists of quoted posts to organize things like who claimed what in each order or to prove/disprove that there is a voteless townie.
fircoal is also a big lurker. he hasn't posted since night 1 and that was on the subject of if suspect was premium when he was banned or not...

so we have a list of three lurkers... anyone care to form an argument against one or all of them? I may try later, but this is just my thoughts on lurkers.

[pmchugh]

Prodded skittles.

[Falkomagno]

CW it is then.

What makes people think that I am mafia?

I'll try to make a nice and proper case tomorrow morning

I should have known not to promise things like this... my nice and proper case will have to wait.

Meanwhile this post by cowboyz and this post by e_i_pi sum up a few good reasons to lynch CW.

Cowboyz only real argument was that I was too lucky in picking naxus. Other than that he just said that we should lynch me since we have a lynch to waste and it would conferm or deny other stories. That is a terrible reason to lynch a bulletproof bodygaurd.

e_i_pi I already responded to.

The only real argument is that I seem too lucky in picking naxus.

But it's not only to be lucky. It's the fact that, been extremely lucky, your tale can be perfectly a lie, and the eipi claim cover the naxus survival. So, we can dispense your story without any problem. Your story can be taken as a blatant lie, and still the facts don't show us the opposite

[naxus]

uh... has anyone else noticed that we have a few lurkers... I say we lynch one of them.
one of which is skittles who hasn't posted since like the beginning of day one... He seems to be active in several other forums/threads though.
another is the noob naxus who said he doesn't have much to input a while back. all he seems to contribute is long lists of quoted posts to organize things like who claimed what in each order or to prove/disprove that there is a voteless townie.
fircoal is also a big lurker. he hasn't posted since night 1 and that was on the subject of if suspect was premium when he was banned or not...

so we have a list of three lurkers... anyone care to form an argument against one or all of them? I may try later, but this is just my thoughts on lurkers.

at least i have posted somewhat normally and havnt been like the other two and not posted in like 6-7 pages

unvote

[cena-rules]

SO really, we have no ideas to go on

[MeDeFe]

uh... has anyone else noticed that we have a few lurkers... I say we lynch one of them.
one of which is skittles who hasn't posted since like the beginning of day one... He seems to be active in several other forums/threads though.
another is the noob naxus who said he doesn't have much to input a while back. all he seems to contribute is long lists of quoted posts to organize things like who claimed what in each order or to prove/disprove that there is a voteless townie.
fircoal is also a big lurker. he hasn't posted since night 1 and that was on the subject of if suspect was premium when he was banned or not...

so we have a list of three lurkers... anyone care to form an argument against one or all of them? I may try later, but this is just my thoughts on lurkers.

Well, he found out the eipi is a double voter, I'd say that's quite productive.

[captainwalrus]

CW it is then.

What makes people think that I am mafia?

I'll try to make a nice and proper case tomorrow morning

I should have known not to promise things like this... my nice and proper case will have to wait.

Meanwhile this post by cowboyz and this post by e_i_pi sum up a few good reasons to lynch CW.

Cowboyz only real argument was that I was too lucky in picking naxus. Other than that he just said that we should lynch me since we have a lynch to waste and it would conferm or deny other stories. That is a terrible reason to lynch a bulletproof bodygaurd.

e_i_pi I already responded to.

The only real argument is that I seem too lucky in picking naxus.

But it's not only to be lucky. It's the fact that, been extremely lucky, your tale can be perfectly a lie, and the eipi claim cover the naxus survival. So, we can dispense your story without any problem. Your story can be taken as a blatant lie, and still the facts don't show us the opposite

I claimed before e_i_pi did, just pointing that out.
And you all mean to tell me that no doctor has ever protected the right person on night one? It was a good guess, I don't see what is scummy about that.

[The Fuzzy Pengui]

Just got caught back up on this - and I didn't see the vote experiment thing (I have to admit - I was rushed the other day so I was skimming).

I'm unvoting for now (and in case "unvoting" isn't counted unvote).

[Crazyirishman]

Maybe we should move to the night phase.

[captainwalrus]

Maybe we should move to the night phase.

I disagree. I want a little more time to sort everything out and get everyone's opinion since we have some lurkers who have not said who they think is scummy.

[cowboyz]

uh... has anyone else noticed that we have a few lurkers... I say we lynch one of them.
one of which is skittles who hasn't posted since like the beginning of day one... He seems to be active in several other forums/threads though.
another is the noob naxus who said he doesn't have much to input a while back. all he seems to contribute is long lists of quoted posts to organize things like who claimed what in each order or to prove/disprove that there is a voteless townie.
fircoal is also a big lurker. he hasn't posted since night 1 and that was on the subject of if suspect was premium when he was banned or not...

so we have a list of three lurkers... anyone care to form an argument against one or all of them? I may try later, but this is just my thoughts on lurkers.

Good point about fircoal, where is he hiding at. He practically lives in the mafia forums.

[God Emperor Q]

unvote, now that we are not doing MeDeFe's plan any more...

[cowboyz]

o yea, unvote

[Mr. Squirrel]

Bump.
This is going too slow. Skittles seems to be absent in every mafia game. Fircoal just seems to be lurking so I'll vote fircoal. I don't think naxus was really lurking all that much.

We need to keep this game moving. Day 1 was a bore and we had nothing good to show of night 1. Now its slowing down again for day 2. I personally don't see a strong enough case against CW but if it will finally get this game going on a decent pace, go ahead and lynch him. Otherwise, I say we just target a lurker and see if he is willing to come out of hiding long enough to save his sorry ass.

[strokem1257]

Bump.
This is going too slow. Skittles seems to be absent in every mafia game. Fircoal just seems to be lurking so I'll vote fircoal. I don't think naxus was really lurking all that much.

We need to keep this game moving. Day 1 was a bore and we had nothing good to show of night 1. Now its slowing down again for day 2. I personally don't see a strong enough case against CW but if it will finally get this game going on a decent pace, go ahead and lynch him. Otherwise, I say we just target a lurker and see if he is willing to come out of hiding long enough to save his sorry ass.

I am tending to agree with you there squirrel. I know fircoal is still active on the site since I talk to him occasionally on msn and such. he just doesn't seem to be posting. . . cant remember if I am voting somewhere so Unvote Vote fircoal for being a scummy looking lurker.