[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Trying to access array offset on null [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null PERMABANS (though you did not know it!) - Page 21 - Conquer Club
Night Strike wrote:If you have a problem with an action of a moderator, you can always take it to Optimus Prime or AndyDufresne. It's part of their jobs. But you'll have to do it via PM, not by raising a fuss in the forums.
What and stifle a complaint, by sweeping it under the rug? Oh wait.....that would put the Moderator under the microscope of the viewers of these forums.
Forget about it! We wouldn't want to complain about certain moderators here, would we? As we all know, ALL of the Moderators have operated in a fair and unbiased manner.
Night Strike wrote:If you have a problem with an action of a moderator, you can always take it to Optimus Prime or AndyDufresne. It's part of their jobs. But you'll have to do it via PM, not by raising a fuss in the forums.
Yeah since open discussion is so detrimental to the workings of this site.
Seriously Nightstrike, you don't see anything wrong with your post here?
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."
Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
If anyone does seriously want to use some kind of filter program on the n-word, I usually like to substitute "cousin" for the n-word. Not that I think the two words are synonymous, but rather that "cousin" is two syllables, and can vaguely mean what the n-word is often meant to convey when used in a hip hop song.
See, since I'm white, I can't really drop the n-word whenever I feel like it, but sometimes I like to drop rhymes with my friends who are into hip hop, and many of them can bandy about the n-word, because, well, you know..
So I say cousin instead if I'm doing karaoke to a well known song in which the n-word is spoken. It doesn't much detract from the experience, and most of my black friends seem to appreciate the practice.
If Conquer Club is considering using one of those filters to block it's use from the boards, I'd recommend setting it up to automatically change it to "cousin", rather than using asterisks to block some of the letters. That way, the intended meaning, when used to insult, doesn't even get communicated. Plus, we can still have academic discussions concerning or involving the word, since everyone knows what "n-word" refers to. So we could just eliminate the word from our possible lexicon all together.
Just an idea.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
I like it. Instead of just 'cousin', I think it would be useful to make a large list of other words that it would be replaced by. Popcorn. Rainbow. Apple. The possibilities are endless.
Timminz wrote:I like it. Instead of just 'cousin', I think it would be useful to make a large list of other words that it would be replaced by. Popcorn. Rainbow. Apple. The possibilities are endless.
If we simply had it replace the word with random other non-offensive words, it would make the filter more intelligible than a certain other user on this site even!
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Timminz wrote:I like it. Instead of just 'cousin', I think it would be useful to make a large list of other words that it would be replaced by. Popcorn. Rainbow. Apple. The possibilities are endless.
You mean if I write 'popcorn' it would be replaced by the (brace yourself children) 'n' word?
Doesn't that defeat the whole purpose of this thread?
It would be quite funny to make a script that randomnly chose certain words and replaced them with 'flange' in the GD Forums.
Say a user commits a "major" and/or "severe" offense and receives a warning because of it.
If said user proceeds to be a total jackass, but under terms of a "minor" offense as opposed to his previous outbursts.
Will this user receive a second warning, this one for a minor infraction?
Will this user be punished immediately?
If so, which direction does it move in?
Theoretically, their course of actions has already placed them in the major/severe category, yet their second offense brings them back to tier one. However, the person is clearly incompetent and incapable of following simple guidelines- so does this keep them in the severe offense realm or lower them to only a minor offense?
Say a user commits a "major" and/or "severe" offense and receives a warning because of it.
If said user proceeds to be a total jackass, but under terms of a "minor" offense as opposed to his previous outbursts.
Will this user receive a second warning, this one for a minor infraction?
Will this user be punished immediately?
If so, which direction does it move in?
Theoretically, their course of actions has already placed them in the major/severe category, yet their second offense brings them back to tier one. However, the person is clearly incompetent and incapable of following simple guidelines- so does this keep them in the severe offense realm or lower them to only a minor offense?
If it were to move them to the "minor category", it damn well better be a SECOND OFFENSE in that "minor category".
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Woodruff wrote:If it were to move them to the "minor category", it damn well better be a SECOND OFFENSE in that "minor category".
That's probably how I would handle it as things are outlined at the moment.
nice to see you are recognizing a problem that you didn't believe existed and you didn't take seriously because i was involved... amazing how quickly things change around here when the big banana sends down a decree...-0
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
If anyone does seriously want to use some kind of filter program on the n-word, I usually like to substitute "cousin" for the n-word. Not that I think the two words are synonymous, but rather that "cousin" is two syllables, and can vaguely mean what the n-word is often meant to convey when used in a hip hop song.
See, since I'm white, I can't really drop the n-word whenever I feel like it, but sometimes I like to drop rhymes with my friends who are into hip hop, and many of them can bandy about the n-word, because, well, you know..
So I say cousin instead if I'm doing karaoke to a well known song in which the n-word is spoken. It doesn't much detract from the experience, and most of my black friends seem to appreciate the practice.
If Conquer Club is considering using one of those filters to block it's use from the boards, I'd recommend setting it up to automatically change it to "cousin", rather than using asterisks to block some of the letters. That way, the intended meaning, when used to insult, doesn't even get communicated. Plus, we can still have academic discussions concerning or involving the word, since everyone knows what "n-word" refers to. So we could just eliminate the word from our possible lexicon all together.
Just an idea.
If someone really meant to use it as an insult they would figure a way to bypass the filter. Such as typing you N-word, or n***** or something like that, which the filter wouldn't pick up. So I think this would only stop those who accidentally used the n-word or thought it was the proper term for African Americans. I don't think there are many of these people.
I don't think it's the word itself that is offensive, but the thought and possible carelessness that goes behind wanting to call someone by that name.
Woodruff wrote:If it were to move them to the "minor category", it damn well better be a SECOND OFFENSE in that "minor category".
That's probably how I would handle it as things are outlined at the moment.
nice to see you are recognizing a problem that you didn't believe existed and you didn't take seriously because i was involved... amazing how quickly things change around here when the big banana sends down a decree...-0
No, I'm not recognizing a problem; I still disagree with having to have different procedures for different forum violations. I stated my case privately to the other mods, and some things were adjusted (but not just because of me). But now that the new guidelines are in place, it's my role as Global Moderator to carry out and enforce those rules, regardless of personal views. I can disagree with what I'm doing while doing it, but if it's in the rules, I need to do it.
4myGod wrote:
If someone really meant to use it as an insult they would figure a way to bypass the filter. Such as typing you N-word, or n***** or something like that, which the filter wouldn't pick up. So I think this would only stop those who accidentally used the n-word or thought it was the proper term for African Americans. I don't think there are many of these people.
I don't think it's the word itself that is offensive, but the thought and possible carelessness that goes behind wanting to call someone by that name.
This is such a simple, brilliant point. I hope that the people who are still arguing the merits of using the n-word read this and pause to think about it.
Say a user commits a "major" and/or "severe" offense and receives a warning because of it.
If said user proceeds to be a total jackass, but under terms of a "minor" offense as opposed to his previous outbursts.
Will this user receive a second warning, this one for a minor infraction?
Will this user be punished immediately?
If so, which direction does it move in?
Theoretically, their course of actions has already placed them in the major/severe category, yet their second offense brings them back to tier one. However, the person is clearly incompetent and incapable of following simple guidelines- so does this keep them in the severe offense realm or lower them to only a minor offense?
This is where the major of theme of community guidelines would come into play I think---Past History of Types of Offenses + Intent.
4myGod wrote:thought it was the proper term for African Americans. I don't think there are many of these people.
One of my best friends is West Indian. She would take issue with you calling her African American. Just say black. It's way more appropriate.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
4myGod wrote:thought it was the proper term for African Americans. I don't think there are many of these people.
One of my best friends is West Indian. She would take issue with you calling her African American. Just say black. It's way more appropriate.
I don't know anything about the issues with West Indians and the n-word, nor with Africans and the n-word, therefore I am only talking about African Americans.
4myGod wrote:thought it was the proper term for African Americans. I don't think there are many of these people.
One of my best friends is West Indian. She would take issue with you calling her African American. Just say black. It's way more appropriate.
I don't know anything about the issues with West Indians and the n-word, nor with Africans and the n-word, therefore I am only talking about African Americans.
No, I mean African American is in itself a bad term. Black people from the West Indies would be very upset to be called the n-word, but would probably still think you an idiot if you call them African American.
I'm not an expert, just parroting what I've heard from someone who is West Indian. Just use the word "black", and you're always good.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
pimpdave wrote:See, since I'm white, I can't really drop the n-word whenever I feel like it, but sometimes I like to drop rhymes with my friends who are into hip hop, and many of them can bandy about the n-word, because, well, you know..
So I say cousin instead if I'm doing karaoke to a well known song in which the n-word is spoken. It doesn't much detract from the experience, and most of my black friends seem to appreciate the practice.
I hate that. If black people get so offended by the n-word, then they need to stop perpetuating it by saying it themselves. You don't see an uproar over "cracker" because we don't go around using it (with exceptions, of course).
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
4myGod wrote:thought it was the proper term for African Americans. I don't think there are many of these people.
One of my best friends is West Indian. She would take issue with you calling her African American. Just say black. It's way more appropriate.
I don't know anything about the issues with West Indians and the n-word, nor with Africans and the n-word, therefore I am only talking about African Americans.
No, I mean African American is in itself a bad term. Black people from the West Indies would be very upset to be called the n-word, but would probably still think you an idiot if you call them African American.
I'm not an expert, just parroting what I've heard from someone who is West Indian. Just use the word "black", and you're always good.
Not at the school I teach at. Generally speaking (there are some who don't see any difference between the two terms), that would get the shit kicked out of you here.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
4myGod wrote:thought it was the proper term for African Americans. I don't think there are many of these people.
One of my best friends is West Indian. She would take issue with you calling her African American. Just say black. It's way more appropriate.
I don't know anything about the issues with West Indians and the n-word, nor with Africans and the n-word, therefore I am only talking about African Americans.
No, I mean African American is in itself a bad term. Black people from the West Indies would be very upset to be called the n-word, but would probably still think you an idiot if you call them African American.
I'm not an expert, just parroting what I've heard from someone who is West Indian. Just use the word "black", and you're always good.
While I prefer to use the term black, it is not always good for all people. Different people like to be called different things. Incidentally, I think it was clear that 4myGod was very specifically talking about people of African ancestry living in the USA, not all black people everywhere. He was not referring to West Indians, Guyanese, Jamaicans, Africans or other black people around the world.
Timminz wrote:I find, people are rarely offended when referred to by their name.
Naturally, but it's hard to refer to millions of people by each individual's name.
Or to make up/reinforce stereotypes.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Well, let's not get off topic, though after 35 pages I don't know if there is anything left to discuss on the topic.
Just to respond. Different things bother different people, some people don't like being called black, others don't like being called African Americans I guess. I am not trying to offend any of them and if someone asked for me to refer to them as something else, including their name I would.
Timminz wrote:I find, people are rarely offended when referred to by their name.
Naturally, but it's hard to refer to millions of people by each individual's name.
Or to make up/reinforce stereotypes.
Actually, that's sadly not hard at all. That's why it's so freaking common.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
