I see, so this explains why Africa, Asia..even south America, all had quite advanced civilizations with writing, prose, architecture, etc. LONG before northern Europeans had any such thing?happy harry wrote:I have a distinct feeling of deja-vu here.
Anyhow, I will continue.
The siole reason for the domination, advanced thinking, hard working in built mentality of the north european peoples, was due to the hardships that were faced during their expansion into the north of europe.#
Well.. corn was not in Africa, and wheat was an edible crop long before Europeans came into real history. Barley and even Rye were used long before wheat was developed to exist in most of Europe.happy harry wrote: It is laughable that you have this idea that the cold, biting tundra of northern europe somehow had "more animals to domesticate"...as opposed to the warmer climates of africa, for instance.
What you fail to comprehend, is that there were no native crops in northern europe....corn ( wheat) was originally an unpalatable crop from the asian peninsula...this had been nurtured by the northern europeans into being an edible crop, to which we built a tolerance for, as with cows milk, too.
Wheat's ancestor actually came from Africa. The first cultivated areas were along the Nile River delta (though some argue for Asian origins and a few even argue for American or multiple origins). Corn was developed independently in the Americas, as were several other grains (quinoa, amaranth, etc.)
India, China, ancient Egypt, Babylon, etc. ... you conveniently ignore their long and rich histories, all while Europeans were still living in stick dwellings.happy harry wrote: See, the reason why the white race has a higher level of industrious thought, is that the long baron winters, and lack of native wildlife readily available, caused said peoples to have to develop a strong sense of community, and also overcome far greater challenges, than, say africans, who had walking meals on their doorsteps, for whenever they could be assed to throw a spear.
In fact, the long winters, etc actually held back Europe for a long time. That is why other cultures had such predominance for so long.
Had I read this garbage first, I probably would not have deigned to answer.happy harry wrote: This is one of the reasons why there is wide-famine issues within africa, as they just ate, and ate without any foresight for future production. They have not got the in-built tools to cope with forward thinking, or overcoming challenges...It's pretty simple.. white people had challenges = bigger brains.
Still, assuming you have some brains. The REAL truth is that famine in Africa has to do with European colonization and monetary domination policies, alongwith changes in climate, not "lack of foresight". In fact, each of those civilizations you deride survived quite successfully without fouling their waters, killing off large populations of animals, etc... While Europeans have managed in a bare 300 years of dominance to destroy much of the world. Who, exactly, really lacks foresight? In fact Europeans are now going back and trying to learn from those "stupid, backward" native populations for truly sustainable ways to do agriculture, etc.
[/quote][/quote]happy harry wrote:"Give a black man a fish,. he eats for a day...give him a fishing rod, he tries to attack someone with it, and steal their fish"
go talk to your KKK buddies. They are the only idiots that could possibly believe the garbage you wrote.
