Since they deleted the official forum .. what makes you think that they will create a usergroup forum.. especially when flaming 'goes against the new direction of the site' (which I like btw)killerpit4e wrote:does any one want to keep flame wars then post in this link we are going to make a group for us flamers to join and we can flame the hell out of each other there
Flamers usergroup
Flame Wars Removed
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
-
blakebowling
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:09 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: 127.0.0.1
Re: Flame Wars Removed
- reggie_mac
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:06 pm
- Location: Queenstown, NZ
- Contact:
Re: Flame Wars Removed
Cool, flame wars was the wrong name for it anyway, it should have been called spam wars.
Soviet Invaders: Space Invaders, it's not just a game
New Zealand Map - Foundry
"You can please all of the people some of the time, or some of the people all of the time, but not all of the people all of the time"
New Zealand Map - Foundry
"You can please all of the people some of the time, or some of the people all of the time, but not all of the people all of the time"
Re: Flame Wars Removed
good show, place was on its knees anyway
had i been wise, i would have seen that her simplicity cost her a fortune
-
LED ZEPPELINER
- Posts: 1088
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:09 pm
Re: Flame Wars Removed
k, so we got rid of flame wars, but where did peace & love go?
sailorseal wrote:My big boy banana was out the whole time
AndyDufresne wrote:Forever linked at the hip's-banana! (That sounds strange, don't quote me.)AndyDufresne wrote:Many Happy Bananas to everyone, lets party...with Bananas.
--Andy
- AndyDufresne
- Posts: 24919
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
- Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
- Contact:
Re: Flame Wars Removed
They both went to Forum Heaven. Or Hell. I'm not sure which. Or maybe they're both in Forum Samsara...and will be reborn? Hm. Thoughts. Things to ponder.
--Andy
--Andy
- sailorseal
- Posts: 2735
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 1:49 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: conquerclub.com
Re: Flame Wars Removed
Or we might have better things to ponder..?AndyDufresne wrote:They both went to Forum Heaven. Or Hell. I'm not sure which. Or maybe they're both in Forum Samsara...and will be reborn? Hm. Thoughts. Things to ponder.
--Andy
Nah, Mmmmmmmm, Maybe they are The Christ and the Anti-Christ and they did the whole super Apocalypse thing and they both died....
- AndyDufresne
- Posts: 24919
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
- Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
- Contact:
Re: Flame Wars Removed
Lets not get this topic off topic, sailorseal. That's my job.
--Andy
--Andy
- sailorseal
- Posts: 2735
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 1:49 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: conquerclub.com
Re: Flame Wars Removed
I thought your job was in the foundry?AndyDufresne wrote:Lets not get this topic off topic, sailorseal. That's my job.
--Andy
You know what they say A monkey never falls far from his tree!
In a effort to remain on topic, I think it is glad to see flame wars gone!
Re: Flame Wars Removed
well it was a useless place and i'm glad it's gone, but i do wonder at the possible prescience of jim's comments......
cheers (for the moment) to the new leader
cheers (for the moment) to the new leader
Liberté, egalité, cash moné
Hey, Fox News: Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo
My heart beats with unconditional love
But beware of the blackness that it's capable of
Hey, Fox News: Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo
My heart beats with unconditional love
But beware of the blackness that it's capable of
Re: Flame Wars Removed
.
*stands up in front of the group*

um... hi... my name is Robinette...
and i'm a flameoholic...
i haven't flamed anyone in 456 days
well... except that one time (sorry fitz)
*the group claps for me while i sit back in my seat, and i'm somehow feeling much more free*

*stands up in front of the group*

um... hi... my name is Robinette...
and i'm a flameoholic...
i haven't flamed anyone in 456 days
well... except that one time (sorry fitz)
*the group claps for me while i sit back in my seat, and i'm somehow feeling much more free*


Re: Flame Wars Removed
Do you always turn into a blonde when you receive an epiphany?Robinette wrote:.
*stands up in front of the group*
um... hi... my name is Robinette...
and i'm a flameoholic...
i haven't flamed anyone in 456 days
well... except that one time (sorry fitz)
*the group claps for me while i sit back in my seat, and i'm somehow feeling much more free*
- AndyDufresne
- Posts: 24919
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
- Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
- Contact:
Re: Flame Wars Removed
I should hope she does, n00blet. But back on topic.
--Andy
--Andy
- Simon Viavant
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:17 pm
- Location: Alaska
Re: Flame Wars Removed
They already tried that a few months ago. Didn't work out very well. (Actually, removing it was an accident, but it was still one hell of a time for the mods, and it'd be even worse if it was removed on purpose.)Artimis wrote:Off Topics(currently titled Much Ado About Nothing), you're next in line for the chop!
Remember Them
Re: Flame Wars Removed
I have to say this is a long-over due move. However, I don't agree with it. There were some golden threads in Flame Wars, and we'll never be able to over look them again when we get bored. Some threads were just hilarious.
This is a sad day in CC history. It's just once more making it 'easier on the mods'. Cause the mods are, absolutely, the life and blood of the CC forums.
This is a sad day in CC history. It's just once more making it 'easier on the mods'. Cause the mods are, absolutely, the life and blood of the CC forums.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Re: Flame Wars Removed
WOW, are the blinkered admirers of the glowing halo light done parading their congratulations as proof of their apparent maturity yet? Did any of you noticed the breathe taking shear lack of consideration for adverse impact, when making such a decision? This is the shape of things to come, or maybe it was always this way and I just didn't notice it to start with......
I hope you'll still be pleased with it when you're unexpectedly deprived of a popular facility. I doubt you'll still be looking in awe of their newer, shinier, brighter halos of "oh-aren't-we-wholesome-now" when it happens to you. I would say "be careful what you wish for, you may just get it", but that's closing the barn door after the horse has already bolted.
I hope you'll still be pleased with it when you're unexpectedly deprived of a popular facility. I doubt you'll still be looking in awe of their newer, shinier, brighter halos of "oh-aren't-we-wholesome-now" when it happens to you. I would say "be careful what you wish for, you may just get it", but that's closing the barn door after the horse has already bolted.
==================================================
This post was sponsored by Far-Q Industries.
Far-Q Industries: Telling you where to go since 2008.
This post was sponsored by Far-Q Industries.
Far-Q Industries: Telling you where to go since 2008.
Re: Flame Wars Removed
I have not quoted this bit to point out your grammatical errors, or even the nice pun. The reason I have quoted this particular bit, is to point out that it is false. If you have read the first post of this thread, you might have noticed this bit.Artimis wrote:Did any of you noticed the breathe taking shear lack of consideration for adverse impact, when making such a decision?
But maybe you're right. Maybe the decision came from a conversation similar to this...Hyasri wrote:We have given this a lot of thought and consideration...
Lackattack: What should we have for lunch today?
Hyasri: How about ham sandwiches?
Lackattack: Sounds good. What about desert?
Hyasri: Hmmm... Let's remove Flame Wars?
Lackattack: Yeah OK.
Re: Flame Wars Removed
Timminz wrote:I have not quoted this bit to point out your grammatical errors, or even the nice pun. The reason I have quoted this particular bit, is to point out that it is false. If you have read the first post of this thread, you might have noticed this bit.Artimis wrote:Did any of you noticed the breathe taking shear lack of consideration for adverse impact, when making such a decision?But maybe you're right. Maybe the decision came from a conversation similar to this...Hyasri wrote:We have given this a lot of thought and consideration...
Lackattack: What should we have for lunch today?
Hyasri: How about ham sandwiches?
Lackattack: Sounds good. What about desert?
Hyasri: Hmmm... Let's remove Flame Wars?
Lackattack: Yeah OK.
TheSaxlad wrote:The Dice suck a lot of the time.
And if they dont suck then they blow.
Re: Flame Wars Removed
You seem to be presuming that there was no consideration given for it. I suspect that's not true at all.Artimis wrote:WOW, are the blinkered admirers of the glowing halo light done parading their congratulations as proof of their apparent maturity yet? Did any of you noticed the breathe taking shear lack of consideration for adverse impact, when making such a decision? This is the shape of things to come, or maybe it was always this way and I just didn't notice it to start with......
Re: Flame Wars Removed
Uhh, considered it, and as far as I can see the benefits far outweigh the detriments.
- muy_thaiguy
- Posts: 12730
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Back in Black
- Contact:
Re: Flame Wars Removed
Where have you been for the last, oh say, year? There has been talks of giving FW the boot for sometime now.Artimis wrote:WOW, are the blinkered admirers of the glowing halo light done parading their congratulations as proof of their apparent maturity yet? Did any of you noticed the breathe taking shear lack of consideration for adverse impact, when making such a decision? This is the shape of things to come, or maybe it was always this way and I just didn't notice it to start with......
I hope you'll still be pleased with it when you're unexpectedly deprived of a popular facility. I doubt you'll still be looking in awe of their newer, shinier, brighter halos of "oh-aren't-we-wholesome-now" when it happens to you. I would say "be careful what you wish for, you may just get it", but that's closing the barn door after the horse has already bolted.
Granted, there were some interesting threads, but those had become few and far between and well outnumbered by the ones not even worth clicking on.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
Re: Flame Wars Removed
I imagine the lack of consultation with it's members beforehand is what's got a few people upset, but I can understand the reasoning behind its removal.
Plenty of sites function well without a flame forum and after all, this is principally a game site and a very successful one - why complicate things?
We thought long and hard over at pileofawesome as to whether or not we should have one, but since we are mainly a chat forum and advocates of free speech, we decided it was in our interest to add one - if people want to let off steam, there's a place to go that doesn't interfere with the general chat or serious discussions.
Having said that, flame forums have never held much interest for me and, though it's sad to think of all that history disappearing overnight, I imagine it's loss will become a distant memory for even its most ardent supporters before too much time has passed.
I've noticed though, that 'much ado' appears to be much less strictly moderated than usual - perhaps the idea is to allow a little more freedom in there to compensate?
Just a guess.
Plenty of sites function well without a flame forum and after all, this is principally a game site and a very successful one - why complicate things?
We thought long and hard over at pileofawesome as to whether or not we should have one, but since we are mainly a chat forum and advocates of free speech, we decided it was in our interest to add one - if people want to let off steam, there's a place to go that doesn't interfere with the general chat or serious discussions.
Having said that, flame forums have never held much interest for me and, though it's sad to think of all that history disappearing overnight, I imagine it's loss will become a distant memory for even its most ardent supporters before too much time has passed.
I've noticed though, that 'much ado' appears to be much less strictly moderated than usual - perhaps the idea is to allow a little more freedom in there to compensate?
Just a guess.
- thegreekdog
- Posts: 7246
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Philadelphia
Re: Flame Wars Removed
Apart from the burden on the administrators (which, admittedly, I know little about), I fail to see how the Flame Wars forum adversely affects anyone. For example, if I'm playing in a game and my opponent flames me in the forum, I would never know about it unless I actually went into the Flame Wars forum and clicked on the link that indicated the flame against me. I understand that people hate those people who flame; however, if the "haters" (for lack of a better term) don't actually go into the forum, the "haters" are not adversely affected in any way by the Flame Wars forum.
In any event, the forum was rather funny at times. I will miss it for sheer entertainment value. I'm just concerned that people feel that a factor in closing the forum was because it was mean or not kid-friendly. If it was to mean for you, don't go there. If you don't want to watch porn, do you avoid porn sites or do you try to get all porn thrown from the internet? A crude example, yes, but very similar.
So, for those of you who are not administrators, congratulating each other on getting rid of Flame Wars is rather stupid considering that if you hated it so much, (1) why did you go there in the first place, (2) why did you go there again after the first time, and (3) if you didn't go there again, how did it affect you in a negative manner?
In any event, the forum was rather funny at times. I will miss it for sheer entertainment value. I'm just concerned that people feel that a factor in closing the forum was because it was mean or not kid-friendly. If it was to mean for you, don't go there. If you don't want to watch porn, do you avoid porn sites or do you try to get all porn thrown from the internet? A crude example, yes, but very similar.
So, for those of you who are not administrators, congratulating each other on getting rid of Flame Wars is rather stupid considering that if you hated it so much, (1) why did you go there in the first place, (2) why did you go there again after the first time, and (3) if you didn't go there again, how did it affect you in a negative manner?
Re: Flame Wars Removed
It wasn't "kid friendly" in fact it was kid hostile.
There was no way to block the thread titles out of a forum search.
Because this isn't an adults-only site (which you clearly seem to prefer) it cannot reasonable sponsor a forum like flame wars.
There was no way to block the thread titles out of a forum search.
Because this isn't an adults-only site (which you clearly seem to prefer) it cannot reasonable sponsor a forum like flame wars.
Re: Flame Wars Removed
This is not about anyone in particular, or what "flamers" did outside of FW. It's entirely based on the overall image that CC wishes to have. It doesn't matter what good, or bad the forum served. A site that has a flame forum portrays a different overall image than one that does not. CC has decided to move towards a cleaner image, and no amount of asking "What harm did it do?" is going to change their mind.
The above post is purely speculation, based on my perception of the situation. Seems about right though, doesn't it.
The above post is purely speculation, based on my perception of the situation. Seems about right though, doesn't it.
Re: Flame Wars Removed
I don't know what the harm is to the community. In fact, I have another idea to float out there... could this be signaling a move toward advertising? Clean up the site, so that it's a friendly, safe option for advertisers, thus increasing revenue, and perhaps allowing Lack to afford a new, bigger server... could this be possible? Any thoughts from people who know, or might know?
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
