battle royale

gimil · Post by **gimil** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 8:02 pm

wicked wrote:Ignore lists should be enforced no matter what IMO. If I don't way to play you, I DON'T WANT TO PLAY YOU. lol If you play in such a way that you made someone's ignore list, then maybe you don't deserve this 'special treat.' You can always ask nicely for someone to remove you. Or better yet, just be nice so you don't make anyone's ignore list.

or you cam add the top brass to your ignore list redcing the number to top end players being able to join the game

rebelman · Post by **rebelman** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 8:25 pm

sully800 wrote:
Worst suggestion ever!

considering the wide array of rubbish posted on most threads here on a daily basis, I take this as a huge compliment as I would be up against some very stiff opposition

rebelman · Post by **rebelman** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 8:30 pm

gimil wrote:
or you cam add the top brass to your ignore list redcing the number to top end players being able to join the game

that was my point as well obviously im loved by all

so i was not worried about being on ignore list but if for example i added the 250 on page 1 of the scoreboard and the first blast from page 2 and joined the game fast having already done this suddenly no captain or higher could enter the battle royal.

i was unaware DiM brought this up previously as im still a noob in these parts or so people keep telling me.

sully800 · Post by **sully800** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 8:48 pm

rebelman wrote:considering the wide array of rubbish posted on most threads here on a daily basis, I take this as a huge compliment as I would be up against some very stiff opposition

A bit of hyperbole on my part of course, but if you like it you can keep the title.

flexmaster33 · Post by **flexmaster33** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:44 pm

how does Battle Royal work...it sounds fun.

jiminski · Post by **jiminski** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 2:12 pm

flexmaster33 wrote:how does Battle Royal work...it sounds fun.

hehe i would explain but I'm not convinced that you would read it..

have a look back through the thread; it tells how it was, how it could be, how it should be and how to seduce a saucy stompette from Seattle!

jako · Post by **jako** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 2:40 pm

personally i think this BR should be term. at least u will get some points for eliminating people in the first few rounds before getting elim urself

u dont want it to be a no-profit lost.

rebelman · Post by **rebelman** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 2:46 pm

jako wrote:personally i think this BR should be term. at least u will get some points for eliminating people in the first few rounds before getting elim urself

u dont want it to be a no-profit lost.

Nah winner takes all - term. BR is awimps excuse for a BR if you dont want to lose pts nobody is forcing you to join

jako · Post by **jako** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 2:51 pm

rebelman wrote:
jako wrote:personally i think this BR should be term. at least u will get some points for eliminating people in the first few rounds before getting elim urself

u dont want it to be a no-profit lost.
Nah winner takes all - term. BR is awimps excuse for a BR if you dont want to lose pts nobody is forcing you to join

who says i was scared of losing points. all im saying is, at least give the guy some points for lasting longer than 1 round and actually taking other people out.

sully800 · Post by **sully800** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 3:53 pm

jako wrote:
rebelman wrote:
jako wrote:personally i think this BR should be term. at least u will get some points for eliminating people in the first few rounds before getting elim urself

u dont want it to be a no-profit lost.
Nah winner takes all - term. BR is awimps excuse for a BR if you dont want to lose pts nobody is forcing you to join
who says i was scared of losing points. all im saying is, at least give the guy some points for lasting longer than 1 round and actually taking other people out.

And then every high ranking player is taken out in the first few seconds of the game

Winner takes all is where its at!

cena-rules · Post by **cena-rules** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 3:55 pm

oi sully do your job and chat with wicked about what you are going to do about the situation involving me.

I agree though

sully800 · Post by **sully800** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:45 pm

See my PM

beezer · Post by **beezer** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:47 pm

Shelter417 wrote:I don't really get the whole attraction; doesn't it come down to a few players after the first turn anyway? Most people won't even get a chance to play.

Perhaps it's because there's safety in numbers. You can say that at least there were 98 other people who didn't win the game.

battle royale

should we have a game for 100 pplz

What is battle royal?

Re: What is battle royal?