Moderator: Cartographers

yes those look a bit silly too and i'm not sure if they will have any negative effect on the XML itself but i'd leave them out.DiM wrote:i'm talking about the dashes
oh you're right indeed, i was a bit sleepy while writing that i guessyeti_c wrote:Hmmm - This is incorrect information I'm afraid!zimmah wrote:i dind't really check the XML but i think DiM refers to the <XML version> tag being in the first line while the MAP tag is on the second line, it should be the complete opposite of that.
C.
Lone.prophet wrote:whats a dash again?
if its the - , its probebly do to copying
he might have copied it, but i didn't write it.DiM wrote:Lone.prophet wrote:whats a dash again?
if its the - , its probebly do to copying
that's the dash.
and i know it's because of copying that's why i asked unit if he copied the xml




Really? You're a French speaker and you don't see the spelling mistake? Hehe.Gilles#1 wrote:Good job
No - viewing it from a browser does that... you should copy and paste from the source file not the uploaded one.Unit_2 wrote:Its not copied, I uploaded it to Ripway and it add's them in.

he wrote Gulfe du St-Laurent on the map while it should be Golfe du St. Laurent or Golfe du Saint-Laurent (either Saint- or St., but not St-) and either Gulf of or Golfe du, but not Gulfe duLone.prophet wrote:why cant "saint" be "st"?
Ok seems like my message got through in the end.Lone.prophet wrote:ahh ok will do
St. Laurent still looks better IMHO.Gilles#1 wrote:Please use Golfe du St-Laurent
yep.yeti_c wrote:No - viewing it from a browser does that... you should copy and paste from the source file not the uploaded one.Unit_2 wrote:Its not copied, I uploaded it to Ripway and it add's them in.
C.
unit_2, in my previous update request, i proposed merging Port Cartier with Manicouagan and making the merged territory part of Duplessis continent. this is because, as u can see on the webpage below, Manicouagan is in the wrong place and ought to be where Port Cartier currently is. are u happy with this change?iancanton wrote:merge Manicouagan with Port Cartier and draw merged territory with a straight western border.
an explanation for each change is given below.iancanton wrote:draw sea route between Îles de la Madeleine and Gaspésie.
remove sea route between Îles de la Madeleine and Anticosti.
for sea routes, try using smaller dots that are closer together.
change Baie-James border so that it borders Mauricie.
rename Bas st-laurent as Bas St-Laurent.
rename Nova Scotia as Nova Scotia & PEI.

What about this? I think this definitely needs looking into.Unit_2 wrote:I beleave there is nothing more that needs done, I don't like the gameplay or borders with yours Iam(no offence), but if we redid it we would have to get the gameplay stamp again.
I'ved looked into the names and I don't see it fit to change them either.
Ruben Cassar wrote: Another thing I'm just noticing. The white text is very hard to read on Newfoundland. Perhaps adding a 1pt dark stroke to the font could make the text more legible?
Unit_2 wrote:I don't like the gameplay
point accepted on merging Port Cartier with Manicouagan.Unit_2 wrote:if we redid it we would have to get the gameplay stamp again.
Baie-James does actually border Mauricie. this is fact, not opinion. look at the map that is linked below. it is a very minor gameplay change that leaves each continent with the same number of borders and has so little practical effect that there is no reason why it will affect the gameplay stamp. it is simply a change that corrects an error.Unit_2 wrote:or borders
Manicouagan is in the wrong place. the territory that u have called Manicouagan is not actually Manicouagan: if u want to retain the territory instead of merging it, then the correct name is Caniapiscau. the real Manicouagan administrative region is located where u have put Port Cartier. again, this is fact, not opinion, and i refer u to the maps below.Unit_2 wrote:I'ved looked into the names and I don't see it fit to change them either.
