Moderator: Community Team
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.

Did you get a notice that nobody visited or no response?safariguy5 wrote:Watched Vio, didn't see anybody. I WIFOMed mafia targeting the proven townie, but they didn't go for it.
Nobody visited.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Did you get a notice that nobody visited or no response?safariguy5 wrote:Watched Vio, didn't see anybody. I WIFOMed mafia targeting the proven townie, but they didn't go for it.
-Tails

Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
He doesn't say much here except to agree that one of them is scum. He also says he'll compare Saf next but never does.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:hmm... the flavor spec seems to fit for both characters, so it's probable one of them is lying (jonty vs Saf)...
So for jonty, if I assume he is mafia....
inactive BW...jonty wrote:I counted Victor twice unvote vote Violet
jonty125 wrote:unvote I'm happy with Vio has now proved her abilities
Lets have a breakdown on the votes on mechapcrap wrote:It appears that Vio is cleared...However, I thought that I had voted for Vio... No big deal.edocsil wrote:Vote Count
safariguy (1) - chapcrap
chapcrap (1) -PCM
jonty (4) - conzo, MeDeFe, Violet, ???
Violet (4) - safariguy, victor, strike wolf, jonty
11 alive, 6 to lynch
Since jonty has 4 votes, perhaps we could hear from him?
1.JokevoteConzocool wrote:Hmmmm...![]()
unvote vote Sully unvote revote Jonty! for swearing to an unknown god!
2.JokevoteMeDeFe wrote:unvote
vote jonty for apparently not counting correctly
3 and 4.Proving her roleVioIet wrote: Vote Jonty
The next vote count should include two votes for jonty- one from me, and one from ???
So two jokevotes, and Vio proving her role. I believe that says it all.
A legitimate defense post, against someone who was dropping scumtells.
This one's harder. He did vote for a townie, as did I, who later turned out to be the doc. If he were scum he would know this. However, chap was playing poorly. Too wifom for anything concrete.jonty125 wrote:The reason why we pressure an inactive is because they are no help to town because a) harder to get a lynch and b) don't hear their view and can't get scumtellschapcrap wrote:About jonty:
I already explained this before. We were pressuring Vio because of supposed inactiveness at other times in mafia and on the site as a whole. With that as the predecessor, I saw no reason to not pressure jonty into a claim since we were basically just pressuring for no reason anyway.
I thought you would have known this and are dropping scumtells left and right unvote vote chapcrap
Backs off the doc... sensible for any player.That would be a gutsy move if you were mafia and I believe it unvote
I aren't going to vote no lynch because finishing the day early is of no value to town as people may still drop scumtells or voting patterns for D2.Says he won't vote no lynch, but endorses Victor's post that he won't support another wagon. Again, nothing damning, considering the doc had just been outed.jonty125 wrote:+1Victor Sullivan wrote:Yeah, I'm certainly would not support another wagon today. We've already pushed our boundaries too far for Day 1 as it is.
-Sully
I'm not thinking he's scummy right now, based purely on these posts. Then again, this could just be solid play. I'll compare to Saf next (too tired atm).
One thing that has been bothering me is the kill on chap... Were the mafia really so desperate to be rid of him, or did they conclude a watcher not likely? Obviously they achieved the kill, but I personally may have waited a day or two, just to rule out the possibility of watchers. idk, I tend to be overly cautious. This leads me to question either players' motive; they both have solid-ish claims, but one of them had to have been responsible for the kill or known about it. I guess I'll wait for jonty's response.
-Tails
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:ok so you first say you didn't visit strike, and now you're saying you did, and that he was visited by Saf... who in turn says he watched you. You're certain that's what actually happened?VS wrote:Night 2: Watched strike wolf, who was visited by none other than safariguy5. I thought I'd hold off releasing this information to see if safari had any more scum to oust today, but I was sadly disappointed.
-Tails
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:hm, this will be kind of a quick day. I would be willing to hammer as well, but if anyone has anything else to say?
-Tails
He just asks a few questions to look like he's contributing but I don't see him adding much to the discussion.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Did you get a notice that nobody visited or no response?safariguy5 wrote:Watched Vio, didn't see anybody. I WIFOMed mafia targeting the proven townie, but they didn't go for it.
-Tails
soundman wrote:I don't have a stong lead but I suspect Tail. Since Day 1 he has only posted four times. Seems to me like he's trying to lay low.He doesn't say much here except to agree that one of them is scum. He also says he'll compare Saf next but never does.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:hmm... the flavor spec seems to fit for both characters, so it's probable one of them is lying (jonty vs Saf)...
So for jonty, if I assume he is mafia....
inactive BW...jonty wrote:I counted Victor twice unvote vote Violet
jonty125 wrote:unvote I'm happy with Vio has now proved her abilities
Lets have a breakdown on the votes on mechapcrap wrote:It appears that Vio is cleared...However, I thought that I had voted for Vio... No big deal.edocsil wrote:Vote Count
safariguy (1) - chapcrap
chapcrap (1) -PCM
jonty (4) - conzo, MeDeFe, Violet, ???
Violet (4) - safariguy, victor, strike wolf, jonty
11 alive, 6 to lynch
Since jonty has 4 votes, perhaps we could hear from him?
1.JokevoteConzocool wrote:Hmmmm...![]()
unvote vote Sully unvote revote Jonty! for swearing to an unknown god!
2.JokevoteMeDeFe wrote:unvote
vote jonty for apparently not counting correctly
3 and 4.Proving her roleVioIet wrote: Vote Jonty
The next vote count should include two votes for jonty- one from me, and one from ???
So two jokevotes, and Vio proving her role. I believe that says it all.
A legitimate defense post, against someone who was dropping scumtells.
This one's harder. He did vote for a townie, as did I, who later turned out to be the doc. If he were scum he would know this. However, chap was playing poorly. Too wifom for anything concrete.jonty125 wrote:The reason why we pressure an inactive is because they are no help to town because a) harder to get a lynch and b) don't hear their view and can't get scumtellschapcrap wrote:About jonty:
I already explained this before. We were pressuring Vio because of supposed inactiveness at other times in mafia and on the site as a whole. With that as the predecessor, I saw no reason to not pressure jonty into a claim since we were basically just pressuring for no reason anyway.
I thought you would have known this and are dropping scumtells left and right unvote vote chapcrap
Backs off the doc... sensible for any player.That would be a gutsy move if you were mafia and I believe it unvote
I aren't going to vote no lynch because finishing the day early is of no value to town as people may still drop scumtells or voting patterns for D2.Says he won't vote no lynch, but endorses Victor's post that he won't support another wagon. Again, nothing damning, considering the doc had just been outed.jonty125 wrote:+1Victor Sullivan wrote:Yeah, I'm certainly would not support another wagon today. We've already pushed our boundaries too far for Day 1 as it is.
-Sully
I'm not thinking he's scummy right now, based purely on these posts. Then again, this could just be solid play. I'll compare to Saf next (too tired atm).
One thing that has been bothering me is the kill on chap... Were the mafia really so desperate to be rid of him, or did they conclude a watcher not likely? Obviously they achieved the kill, but I personally may have waited a day or two, just to rule out the possibility of watchers. idk, I tend to be overly cautious. This leads me to question either players' motive; they both have solid-ish claims, but one of them had to have been responsible for the kill or known about it. I guess I'll wait for jonty's response.
-TailsTA1LGUNN3R wrote:ok so you first say you didn't visit strike, and now you're saying you did, and that he was visited by Saf... who in turn says he watched you. You're certain that's what actually happened?VS wrote:Night 2: Watched strike wolf, who was visited by none other than safariguy5. I thought I'd hold off releasing this information to see if safari had any more scum to oust today, but I was sadly disappointed.
-TailsTA1LGUNN3R wrote:hm, this will be kind of a quick day. I would be willing to hammer as well, but if anyone has anything else to say?
-TailsHe just asks a few questions to look like he's contributing but I don't see him adding much to the discussion.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Did you get a notice that nobody visited or no response?safariguy5 wrote:Watched Vio, didn't see anybody. I WIFOMed mafia targeting the proven townie, but they didn't go for it.
-Tails
I know this isn't the strongest case but it's the best I have. So Vote Tail
What do you guys think?
Yes they were, but that's all you've done. Asked two questions. You haven't voted or added your thoughts. Seems to me you're trying to stay low and unseen.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:My latest questions were actually very pointed and very specific, without trying too reveal too much. Anything else you got?
-Tails

Prod Safari if needed, please.Rodion wrote:I also want to know what Safari suggests we do today.
Not going to prod someone who has posted on the last page.Rodion wrote:Prod Safari if needed, please.Rodion wrote:I also want to know what Safari suggests we do today.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Gods damn it you guys! Learn to spot the difference between a deliberate attempt at misdirection and a slip-up.edocsil wrote: Ares, god of war, had kept still the had of war till now. Now his judgment fell in folly, guided by the hands of fallen foes.
MeDeFe ~ Artemis Tracker Has been killed
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
I think Vio is on the right track here when we're talking about how many mafia we think we have left. And for the record, I'm a Watcher not a Tracker Vio.VioIet wrote:Proven Roles
1. Violet- Double- Voter
2. Safari- Tracker
Unclaimed
1. Rodion
3. Tailgunner
7. Soundman replaced Conzocool
9. Pancakemix
Four people unaccounted for- unless my memory is failing me.
At least one have to be scum. I feel that even if we mis-lynch today, and mafia kill someone tonight, we will still be okay.

Let's hear it. I'm starting to think that my actions prevented the mafia kill, unlikely as I considered it at first.soundman wrote:I may also know why the mafia didn't have a night kill but don't want to say too much atm.
