Moderator: Tournament Directors
If I'm reading this correctly (and I could easily be wrong), the last AFC spot is up for grabs between the J-E-T-S Jets Jets Jets at 8-8, the Raidahs at 8-7, and the Colts at 7-7. If all 3 finish at 8-8, which by definition means all 3 would have conference records of 6-6, how will the tiebreaker be resolved? (I think Colts beat the Raiders during the season, and Jets faced neither team).Optimus Prime wrote:Okay, the standings are now updated, and all games that should be active are now active. We have all of our NFC playoff teams determined, but we need a handful more games to finish before we can determine the seeding.
As for the AFC we have 5 of 6 teams clinched and need a few games to finish to find the last team and determine the seeding.
Keep playing hard, this should solidify in the next few days.
Regards, Optimus Prime
I'm praying that the dice gods don't let that happen.Easy n Dirty wrote:If I'm reading this correctly (and I could easily be wrong), the last AFC spot is up for grabs between the J-E-T-S Jets Jets Jets at 8-8, the Raidahs at 8-7, and the Colts at 7-7. If all 3 finish at 8-8, which by definition means all 3 would have conference records of 6-6, how will the tiebreaker be resolved? (I think Colts beat the Raiders during the season, and Jets faced neither team).Optimus Prime wrote:Okay, the standings are now updated, and all games that should be active are now active. We have all of our NFC playoff teams determined, but we need a handful more games to finish before we can determine the seeding.
As for the AFC we have 5 of 6 teams clinched and need a few games to finish to find the last team and determine the seeding.
Keep playing hard, this should solidify in the next few days.
Regards, Optimus Prime
Thanks, and thanks also for a great tournament, lotta' fun.
Apologies if this has already been answered elsewhere in this 18-page thread.
If you are trying to mimic the NFL, then division records should not be a tiebreaker. Division records are only used to break ties within the same division (i.e., for a division title) and are not a tiebreaker when selecting wildcards.Optimus Prime wrote:I'm praying that the dice gods don't let that happen.Easy n Dirty wrote:If I'm reading this correctly (and I could easily be wrong), the last AFC spot is up for grabs between the J-E-T-S Jets Jets Jets at 8-8, the Raidahs at 8-7, and the Colts at 7-7. If all 3 finish at 8-8, which by definition means all 3 would have conference records of 6-6, how will the tiebreaker be resolved? (I think Colts beat the Raiders during the season, and Jets faced neither team).Optimus Prime wrote:Okay, the standings are now updated, and all games that should be active are now active. We have all of our NFC playoff teams determined, but we need a handful more games to finish before we can determine the seeding.
As for the AFC we have 5 of 6 teams clinched and need a few games to finish to find the last team and determine the seeding.
Keep playing hard, this should solidify in the next few days.
Regards, Optimus Prime
Thanks, and thanks also for a great tournament, lotta' fun.
Apologies if this has already been answered elsewhere in this 18-page thread.However, in case it does, I'm double checking things today to see what the tie-breaker situation will be.
It should go as such:
1. Head to Head
2. Division Record
3. Conference Record
4. (I'm going to have to figure out, let's hope that doesn't happen.)
Right now, we (the Jets) are in the clubhouse at 8-8. Raiders are 8-7 and look to be in trouble in their week 16 contest. Colts are 7-8 and their week 16 contest is too early on to make a decent projection in my opinion (only round 4 and it's on the world 2.0 map).Optimus Prime wrote:Then what do you suggest I use following the Conference Records?
Nah - after my last post, I went back and checked and the Raiders would have deserved to go ahead of us even at 8-8 due to better record in common games and better strength of victory.Optimus Prime wrote:THANK YOU GOD!!!
As for the Jets, I know Easy n Dirty was hoping to get in, but New England and Baltimore bumped you out of contention. You were close though.
No problem, I'm glad you enjoyed it. I think once we get the mass PM with the forum upgrade I'll think about running us another one.Easy n Dirty wrote:Nah - after my last post, I went back and checked and the Raiders would have deserved to go ahead of us even at 8-8 due to better record in common games and better strength of victory.Optimus Prime wrote:THANK YOU GOD!!!
As for the Jets, I know Easy n Dirty was hoping to get in, but New England and Baltimore bumped you out of contention. You were close though.
Thanks again, this was a fun tournament.
You aren't done yet, my friend. You've still go the playoffs coming up in a couple days.fish061 wrote:lol too true happy you are an awesome partner anytime you would like to play again let me know.happy2seeyou wrote:Fish has been a great partner... just thought I would say that. lol He had to put up with my mood swings and tantrums in a few games...