Conquer Club

Posted: **Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:08 am**

magneticgoop wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:Same here. Cum on Feel the Noise is meant to be a Hard Rock song, not soft rock or Indie, or whatever they are.
indie isn't a style it just means they aren't part of a record label, they fly solo which had advantages and disadvantages,

yeah but indie has a certain style.

Posted: **Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:09 am**

magneticgoop wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:Same here. Cum on Feel the Noise is meant to be a Hard Rock song, not soft rock or Indie, or whatever they are.
indie isn't a style it just means they aren't part of a record label, they fly solo which had advantages and disadvantages,

Guess that's why I don't know many Indie bands.

Posted: **Mon Oct 15, 2007 5:56 pm**

I prefer it by quiet riot. IDK why I just do. Maybe it's that they sing it better.

Posted: **Mon Oct 15, 2007 6:06 pm**

cena-rules wrote:
magneticgoop wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:Same here. Cum on Feel the Noise is meant to be a Hard Rock song, not soft rock or Indie, or whatever they are.
indie isn't a style it just means they aren't part of a record label, they fly solo which had advantages and disadvantages,
yeah but indie has a certain style.

nope

in·die (ĭn'dē) Pronunciation Key
n. Informal

1. One, such as a studio or producer, that is unaffiliated with a larger or more commercial organization.
2. An artistic work produced by an independent company or group: "[His film] showed that indies could . . . take in millions at the box office" (Liesl Schillinger).

adj. Of, relating to, or being an indie: an album of indie rock; an indie film company.

Posted: **Mon Oct 15, 2007 7:17 pm**

Strife wrote:I prefer it by quiet riot. IDK why I just do. Maybe it's that they sing it better.

Probably so, they just basically improved it from Slade, but, in my opinion, Oasis ruined one of rock's greatest songs.

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:22 pm**

Kevin Dubrow died.

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:41 pm**

2dimes wrote:Kevin Dubrow died.

Crap.

I can't believe you actually went looking for this thread though.

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:47 pm**

I have not fully absorbed the thing with Kevin, bummer though.

Regarding your second sentance, I'm like that, search is my friend.

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:13 pm**

Amazing!

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:47 pm**

The oasis version is absolutely awesome.
If you think otherwise, you should end it now.
Its powerful.
So you think i cant post for shit?
Well, that aint no worry...

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:57 pm**

muy_thaiguy wrote:
Strife wrote:I prefer it by quiet riot. IDK why I just do. Maybe it's that they sing it better.
Probably so, they just basically improved it from Slade, but, in my opinion, Oasis ruined one of rock's greatest songs.

Why do you love it so much? It's a pretty average 80's song to me... just wondering.

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:03 pm**

Arbustos wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Strife wrote:I prefer it by quiet riot. IDK why I just do. Maybe it's that they sing it better.
Probably so, they just basically improved it from Slade, but, in my opinion, Oasis ruined one of rock's greatest songs.
Why do you love it so much? It's a pretty average 80's song to me... just wondering.

It's one of those songs that makes you want to start moving to the rythm.

BTW suggs, even Norse (whom happens to be a major fan of Oasis) says that version sucks. I have to agree with Norse there.

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:04 pm**

muy_thaiguy wrote:
Arbustos wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Strife wrote:I prefer it by quiet riot. IDK why I just do. Maybe it's that they sing it better.
Probably so, they just basically improved it from Slade, but, in my opinion, Oasis ruined one of rock's greatest songs.
Why do you love it so much? It's a pretty average 80's song to me... just wondering.
It's one of those songs that makes you want to start moving to the rythm.

BTW suggs, even Norse (whom happens to be a major fan of Oasis) says that version sucks. I have to agree with Norse there.

Oh... so you like disco?

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:07 pm**

Arbustos wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Arbustos wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Strife wrote:I prefer it by quiet riot. IDK why I just do. Maybe it's that they sing it better.
Probably so, they just basically improved it from Slade, but, in my opinion, Oasis ruined one of rock's greatest songs.
Why do you love it so much? It's a pretty average 80's song to me... just wondering.
It's one of those songs that makes you want to start moving to the rythm.

BTW suggs, even Norse (whom happens to be a major fan of Oasis) says that version sucks. I have to agree with Norse there.
Oh... so you like disco?

Not that kind of music!

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:09 pm**

That kinda proves my point. If a right wing xenophobic bigot whos heart is so full of hate he probably woldnt recognise a passionate song if it came up and tongued him, that a good enough reason to like it.
Lets be honest-Oasis just rocked up Slades classic-how you can like one and not the other is beyond me, they are quite similar.
And i love Oasis, but thats all they are, a souped up Slade.
And nowt rong with that.

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:20 pm**

suggs wrote:That kinda proves my point. If a right wing xenophobic bigot whos heart is so full of hate he probably woldnt recognise a passionate song if it came up and tongued him, that a good enough reason to like it.
Lets be honest-Oasis just rocked up Slades classic-how you can like one and not the other is beyond me, they are quite similar.
And i love Oasis, but thats all they are, a souped up Slade.
And nowt rong with that.

I tried listening to it, and quite frankly, it pissed me off and hurt my ears at the same time.

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:23 pm**

Then i guess rock music isnt for you.
You might find "Ode to Joy" a bit too heavy as well.
Pehaps the Osmonds are more your cuppa tea.

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:29 pm**

suggs wrote:Then i guess rock music isnt for you.
You might fing "Ode to Joy" a bit too heavy as well.
Pehaps the Osmonds are more your cuppa tea.

No, Indie Rock isn't for me, Metal and Hard Rock are for me, Country, Jazz, Classical, whatever. I enjoy many types of music and don't need a "high and mighty, know everything," person to tell me what I should and shouldn't listen to. I listened to Oasis to hear what they sounded like, and quite hinestly, it sucked in comparison to both Slade and Quiet Riot, thank you very much.

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:33 pm**

I wasnt telling you what to listen to. But Oasis is rock music, pure and simple. Nuff said.

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:36 pm**

suggs wrote:I wasnt telling you what to listen to. But Oasis is rock music, pure and simple. Nuff said.

Glam Rock at it's finest, of course.

And this is rock, pure and simple.

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:39 pm**

Well, early rock! but classic stuff cheers!

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:44 pm**

Never really noticed the accordian in the mix on that one.

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:26 pm**

I can't agree more man!

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:48 pm**

I replied "no" on the general principle that I think Oasis is awesome.

I don't really care for the song in question actually. The f*ck if I care if they stole a song or whatever.

What is this about again?

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:51 pm**

Snorri1234 wrote:I replied "no" on the general principle that I think Oasis is awesome.

I don't really care for the song in question actually. The f*ck if I care if they stole a song or whatever.

What is this about again?

It was about Oasis' version being crap compared to the 1st two versions of the song.

Conquer Club

Question about "Cum on Feel the Noise"