Conquer Club

Votanic wrote:While yo're doing that, also put a 'zero' at the bottom of the list of troops to advance.
It is a complete drag to have to scroll to the top of the list to 'advance zero troops', especially when armies run into the thousands.

Advancing zero is as easy as clicking on the attacking territory rather than the one you’d advance to.

TheMissionary wrote:Advancing zero is as easy as clicking on the attacking territory rather than the one you’d advance to.

Interesting. Didn't know that. VERY good to know.

But putting a zero in the bottom of the list would be great as well. It's always good to wish upon a star...

paulk wrote:

TheMissionary wrote:Advancing zero is as easy as clicking on the attacking territory rather than the one you’d advance to.

Interesting. Didn't know that. VERY good to know.

But putting a zero in the bottom of the list would be great as well. It's always good to wish upon a star...

I'd prefer a zero on the list. There are a lot of situations where the site 'blinks' and clicks go astray. That can happen with deployment and forting too.

Now my suggestion, that l believe is a very reasonable one, has been on the board for 3 months.
I think that should be a sufficient time for "someone" to say if or if not it is going to be implemented.
Why else even have a suggestion board?
Is this a Kafka forum?
I am very dissatisfied and disappointed.

I, also, think we could expect see some reply from the designers. ..And, of course, I believe my suggestion is reasonable and would be very helpful.

I wonder what is the status of this suggestion. It seems like this would be a valuable addition, just to have two boxes after choosing Auto-Attack, one for the number of troops the attacker wants left on their territory, the other, the number of troops the attacker wants left on the defender's territory and, if both boxes are filled in, whichever comes first.

paulk wrote:Now my suggestion, that l believe is a very reasonable one, has been on the board for 3 months.
I think that should be a sufficient time for "someone" to say if or if not it is going to be implemented.
Why else even have a suggestion board?
Is this a Kafka forum?
I am very dissatisfied and disappointed.

Apologies for the delay, was hoping to see some more support from the community for suggestions in general but we'll take a quick look and get back to you.

First impression is that we are already tight on space in the UI but it does feel reasonable to have a stop at half type option but no commitments let me get back to you.

Yep a good thing to implement which can ultimately save millions of mouse clicks and millions of seconds, minutes and hours globally

I'm all for it.

Lx