Personally i would way rather those two updates to killer neutrals and adjacent attacks.Army of GOD wrote:I don't know a single person that would rather those two incredibly small updates compared to adjacent attacks, killer neutrals or 12 player games...
Web 2.0
Moderator: Community Team
Re: Web 2.0
-
Army of GOD
- Posts: 7178
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: Web 2.0
Why..?ljex wrote:Personally i would way rather those two updates to killer neutrals and adjacent attacks.Army of GOD wrote:I don't know a single person that would rather those two incredibly small updates compared to adjacent attacks, killer neutrals or 12 player games...
mrswdk is a ho
- rdsrds2120
- Posts: 6274
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:42 am
- Gender: Male
Re: Web 2.0
So, we know that the OP suggestion won't be implemented. Move to rejected?
-
Darwins_Bane
- Posts: 989
- Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 7:09 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Re: Web 2.0
Agreed.
high score : 2294
02:59:29 ‹Khan22› wouldn't you love to have like 5 or 6 girls all giving you attention?
10/11/2010 02:59:39 ‹TheForgivenOne› No.
02:59:29 ‹Khan22› wouldn't you love to have like 5 or 6 girls all giving you attention?
10/11/2010 02:59:39 ‹TheForgivenOne› No.
Re: Web 2.0
because skip game is useful and i hate spoils cluttering the chat. Also adjacent attacks seems painfully boring...and killer nuetrals is just another way to get screwed based on bad luck...something i dont want introduced into the game.Army of GOD wrote:Why..?ljex wrote:Personally i would way rather those two updates to killer neutrals and adjacent attacks.Army of GOD wrote:I don't know a single person that would rather those two incredibly small updates compared to adjacent attacks, killer neutrals or 12 player games...
-
Army of GOD
- Posts: 7178
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: Web 2.0
But plenty more people want this and you don't HAVE to play those settings you know?ljex wrote:because skip game is useful and i hate spoils cluttering the chat. Also adjacent attacks seems painfully boring...and killer nuetrals is just another way to get screwed based on bad luck...something i dont want introduced into the game.Army of GOD wrote:Why..?ljex wrote:Personally i would way rather those two updates to killer neutrals and adjacent attacks.Army of GOD wrote:I don't know a single person that would rather those two incredibly small updates compared to adjacent attacks, killer neutrals or 12 player games...
mrswdk is a ho
Re: Web 2.0
no i dont have to play them but i actually like teammate spoils as way less clutter in chat and much easier to see. Also skip game is and awesome feature that i use all the time...in fact its something i have wanted for a long time. I can understand why other people want different things to be implemented all im saying is that your statement is wrong...i would rather the updates that we have had over what you say is things people want. People have different opinions you cant come in here and make a statement like that as its simply not trueArmy of GOD wrote:But plenty more people want this and you don't HAVE to play those settings you know?ljex wrote:because skip game is useful and i hate spoils cluttering the chat. Also adjacent attacks seems painfully boring...and killer nuetrals is just another way to get screwed based on bad luck...something i dont want introduced into the game.Army of GOD wrote:Why..?ljex wrote:Personally i would way rather those two updates to killer neutrals and adjacent attacks.Army of GOD wrote:I don't know a single person that would rather those two incredibly small updates compared to adjacent attacks, killer neutrals or 12 player games...
Re: Web 2.0
ljex wrote:Personally i would way rather those two updates to killer neutrals and adjacent attacks.Army of GOD wrote:I don't know a single person that would rather those two incredibly small updates compared to adjacent attacks, killer neutrals or 12 player games...
Holy crap... I find myself agreeing with ljex...
Highest Rank: 26 Highest Score: 3480

