Pulp Fiction Mafia CULT WINS!!!

Aimless · Post by **Aimless** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 5:22 pm

The1exile wrote:
Aimless wrote:However, once it was obvious spiesr was getting lynched, I wouldn't have put it past one of the other mafia to drop the hammer on him in an attempt to make themselves look more innocent.
It's possible, but I'd think unlikely. I mean, the person who drops the hammer on someone always get suspicion, regardless of whether or not the lynchee is mafia or townie or whatever. If the mafia were smart enough (ok, so spiesr is a good reason why they wouldn't be, but there could be others) to think up something like that, they'd probably have other ways of looking innocent.

IGS might be more suspicious because he hasn't posted too much, though.

I agree with possible, but unlikely. Which is why I didn't FOS I GOT SERVED. It's not that I think it's the case that that is what happened; rather, I think we should not rule that possibility out.

Aimless · Post by **Aimless** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 5:23 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:I'm sorry, but PLEASE READ THIS

If spiesr is the mafia leader, then could he not have put the death on another... Is that not their ability?

I think that only applies to night kills, not lynches.

Colaalone · Post by **Colaalone** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 5:27 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:I'm sorry, but PLEASE READ THIS

If spiesr is the mafia leader, then could he not have put the death on another... Is that not their ability?

God Fathers are immune to nightkills, not day lynches.

pancakemix · Post by **pancakemix** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 5:29 pm

No, they come up innocent upon investigation.

The1exile · Post by **The1exile** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 5:31 pm

pancakemix wrote:No, they come up innocent upon investigation.

They can delegate the duty of being NK'd to one of their other mafia buddies. Dunno about the rest of their powers.

mandalorian2298 · Post by **mandalorian2298** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 5:46 pm

The1exile wrote:
mandalorian2298 wrote:
Aimless wrote:Well, here's what we know so far, based on voting patterns :

spiesr voted for both mandalorian and spinwizard(cloud) during day one. Thus it is almost certain that neither of those are mafia.

Beyond that, considering the way spiesr was acting, I wouldn't put it past the other mafia to put the hammer on his bandwagon just to get rid of him and throw suspicion off of themselves.
Doc, protect me because a huge target has just been drawn on my back!
Oh, and leave spin/cloud to burn! Real greatful fo you!

In any case, I dare say the mafia would target the more active/experienced posters, or those with a power role. Not that I think you're bad/inactive manda, but there're others leading the way more.

Well, it would be real stupid of me to try and give reasons why I should be killed, so I totaly agree with you

And aimless, I just felt like whining. Np man, it was a good conclusion and it gives me a reason to pester the Doc with requests for help (being a selfish bugger that I am

)

derfderf34 · Post by **derfderf34** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 5:50 pm

who would kill me?

mandalorian2298 · Post by **mandalorian2298** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 5:51 pm

Well, enough spamming from me, let's wait for selin to make a defense. If he doesn't do it and 24 hours pass from the original FOS, I am voting for him (unless a better case is made, of course)

Selin · Post by **Selin** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 5:59 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:FOS: Selin
For voting with Spiesr when he turned out to be the Godfather...

The vote count post of colaalone has a mistake:

First I voted for spinwizard, because he hasn't posted anything until that time and I thought someone not posting anything can't help us. After colaalone's explanation about spinwizard (that he is sick and will be replaced), i unvoted spinwizard and voted for spiesr. See respective posts!

Honestly said, after colaalone's explanation I had no idea who to vote. Also, I didn't have a clue why so many voted for spiesr. But the deadline was very close, so I joined you all to be able to have a lynch.

mandalorian2298 · Post by **mandalorian2298** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:00 pm

OK, I know that this is my third post in a row, but I (The One-who-isn't-mafia

) think I found the second scum.
vote pancakemix for DESPERATLY trying to draw attention from spiesar during day one. I would put in the qoutes, but since there hasn't been much posts and most were short, READ THEM YOURSELVES!

pancakemix · Post by **pancakemix** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:05 pm

Desperately? I didn't think I was drawing attention at all, let alone being desperate about it. I just didn't think he was mafia, so I ignored the bandwagoning.

Aimless · Post by **Aimless** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:10 pm

mandalorian2298 wrote:OK, I know that this is my third post in a row, but I (The One-who-isn't-mafia ) think I found the second scum.
vote pancakemix for DESPERATLY trying to draw attention from spiesar during day one. I would put in the qoutes, but since there hasn't been much posts and most were short, READ THEM YOURSELVES!

Hmmm, he did seem to be defending spiesr, and his first two votes were immediately against people who voted spiesr.

FOS pancakemix

mandalorian2298 · Post by **mandalorian2298** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:11 pm

pancakemix wrote:Desperately? I didn't think I was drawing attention at all, let alone being desperate about it. I just didn't think he was mafia, so I ignored the bandwagoning.

Well, you were wrong!

pancakemix · Post by **pancakemix** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:12 pm

Look at my reasons for voting and tell me those aren't jokes. Being the second to vote and misspelling words is just goofing off before we search for scum.

mandalorian2298 · Post by **mandalorian2298** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:14 pm

Aimless wrote:Hmmm, he did seem to be defending spiesr, and his first two votes were immediately against people who voted spiesr.

FOS pancakemix

He was probably desperate because spiesar got himself in trouble in the beggining of the game. But, notice how attamps one vote (nah it didn't stuck) unvotes and tries another. And reason for both votes are rather lacking.

pancakemix · Post by **pancakemix** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:18 pm

I was poking fun at derf for having a dumb reason to vote spiesr, and then I was poking fun at unriggable for spelling 3 words wrong when he voted for spiesr for spelling maybe wrong.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:41 pm

pancakemix wrote:I was poking fun at derf for having a dumb reason to vote spiesr, and then I was poking fun at unriggable for spelling 3 words wrong when he voted for spiesr for spelling maybe wrong.

How long does it take people to learn!!

POKING FUN AT PEOPLE IN MAFIA IS FUCKIN DUMB!

If you die from it, don't whine!!!

mandalorian2298 · Post by **mandalorian2298** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 7:04 pm

Ok, I took trouble to make a little essay called: "Why should an intelligent townie lynch pancake" I know that it sounds stuck up (like I am saying that those who don't agree with me aren't intelligent

) but, if you read this post, I think that you won't have any doubt left (and please remember, I am one of 2 guys least likely to be mafia

):
The story begins with spiesar having 3 votes for voting NO LYNCH in his first post:

pancakemix wrote:If a townie does get killed, then we can eliminate bandwagoners the next day, so the random lynch does have some logic to it.

spiesar makes an accusation that I am bandwagoning (wich later got him hung

). Narc and Aimless vote unit_2 for submarrining. spiesar swiches his vote from me to spinwizard (without even waiting for my response

)

pancakemix wrote:
Syzygy wrote:Why don't we rather let Unit_2 be replaced?
Because he might come in later on and try to defend himself, which he probably will.

I respond pointing out how lame siesar's accusation for bandwagoning is (without noticing that he changed his vote

) But, then pancake gets another idea:

pancakemix wrote:Also, I think we should get rid of the non-posters, and since it's day 1, why not?

vote spinwizard

Translation: "Could we vote somebody who isn't spiesar, PLEASE!!!!

spiesar points out that he DID unvote me. It doesn't matter to anyone, since it is not his vote for me, but the argument behind it that makes him suspicius.

No, wait, he did seem to convince someone

:

pancakemix wrote:He did unvote mandalorian

Then comes this:

Anarkistsdream wrote:
pancakemix wrote:Also, I think we should get rid of the non-posters, and since it's day 1, why not?

vote spinwizard
FOS: pancakemix

Try to get him replaced... Don't waste a lynch day. If we lynch a townie, like that, we have wasted a day AND a vote...

pancakemix wrote:I don't seriously think anyone else will vote for him. Besides, you're voting for Unit_2, another non-poster, so you shouldn't be one to talk.

Soooo...at the ending hours of Day 1, pancake is voting for someone who doesn't stand a chance to get lynched

Looks like a NO LYNCH vote to me.

pancakemix wrote:I read through the thread twice and did not find a single post by Unit_2.

FOS AD

For saying that a non-poster should get replaced instead of wasting a day on lynching him

Anarkistsdream wrote: OF KILLING UNIT_2 in every thread that he dares to join
Anarkistsdream wrote:Unit_2 just posted in another mafia thread... Please kill him.
However, sane people are uninpressed. Well, sane townies are...
pancakemix wrote:Let's kill him

unvote

Vote Unit_2 for previously mentioned reasons (i.e. lurking)
Unit_2 gets replaced by Kitten, and pancake postes one of the rare UNSUPICIUS posts of DAY 1
pancakemix wrote:Oh.

unvote
Now, please observe to consecutive posts and try to guess wich one is posted by a mafia member
Syzygy wrote:Deadlines approaching.

Vote: spiesr for being the most suspicious by far.
pancakemix wrote:FOS exile for not unvoting
And, I know that this is starting to look like I have a vendetta against pancake (wich I don't, outside this game of course), BUT here is one for a MULTI CHARGE!
Aimless wrote:I hate to bandwagon, but the deadline is approaching.

Vote: Spiesr for acting erratically.

pancakemix wrote:I haven't voted too erratically. Two were jokes and the other two were for not-talking people.

To summerize: Townies: vote pancake
Doc: Protect me so that I can help find out the third guy (I have some supicions, but I don't wan't to give mafia a way to split the town + at this point, I am not SURE about anyone else being mafia)

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 7:11 pm

WOW, mandy!!!

I agree...

Vote: Pancakemix

mandalorian2298 · Post by **mandalorian2298** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 7:11 pm

I seemed to get my text mixed with a quote (My text was supposed to be: Narc goes on with his QUEST TO KILL UNIT_2 IN EVERY THREAD THAT HE DARES TO JOIN)

I hate it when jokes backfire on me

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 7:12 pm

mandalorian2298 wrote: I seemed to get my text mixed with a quote (My text was supposed to be: Narc goes on with his QUEST TO KILL UNIT_2 IN EVERY THREAD THAT HE DARES TO JOIN)

I hate it when jokes backfire on me

So you are saying I look suspicious...? So I am the other person...?

I thought we already clarified that I wasn't?

mandalorian2298 · Post by **mandalorian2298** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 7:21 pm

Nah, I am just informing the new players about strange behaviour. So that they don't get scared of you, Anna.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 7:22 pm

mandalorian2298 wrote:Nah, I am just informing the new players about strange behaviour. So that they don't get scared of you, Anna.

Mandy and Anna.... Great.

mandalorian2298 · Post by **mandalorian2298** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 7:25 pm

You didn't think that I would stoop as low as calling you a girl?
Well, there is now level of being childish that is to low for frendly jabing.

pancakemix · Post by **pancakemix** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 7:25 pm

Here is a much shorter essay called "mandalorian is wrong (in the politest way possible.)"

1. I was seriously under the impression that spiesr was a townie. He turned out to be the godfather (which I didn't expect.) In the place you quoted me, it clearly says "We should lynch someone, not go No Lynch", so actually, that post was against spiesr.

2.I was simply pointing out that Unit_2 might come to defend himself. Nothing wrong with that.

3.Again, I am supporting my own view of a random lynch, and who better to get rid of than someone not posting?

4.I was talking to other people who, apparently, missed that post or were just looking for an excuse to bandwagon.

5.See number 3 for part one, and you completely ignored AD's hypocracy. So I FOSed him for being a hypocrite, and then he was just being sarcastic

6.I voted Unit_2 for ignoring the thread. He had the oppurtunity, but didn't take it. Then I unvoted to give s.xkitten the benefit of the doubt.

7.I was simply pointing out that exile hadn't unvoted. I was helping him.

8.That was directed at unriggable. In his unofficial vote count, he noted I had been voting erratically.

Thank you for reading that big long thing.[/i]