CC'S ALL TIME TOP 100 SCORES

JOHNNYROCKET24 · Post by **JOHNNYROCKET24** » Wed Apr 01, 2009 5:39 pm

Bruceswar wrote:The bar is now soo high many cannot reach it. I will make general I hope soon!

even the players on top of the scoreboard are not getting high scores. I think I only had to edit 2 players in the last 3 days. but hey, less work for me !

Robinette · Post by **Robinette** » Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:09 pm

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:The bar is now soo high many cannot reach it. I will make general I hope soon!
even the players on top of the scoreboard are not getting high scores. I think I only had to edit 2 players in the last 3 days. but hey, less work for me !

Then you have no excuse to comply with my request to give a purple asterisk to the ones who lose the most...

if you'll add a colored asterisk for all those with win rates BELOW 40%...
but don't make it PINK... no, not that... make it.... ummm... make it PURPLE... i LOVE purple!

If 40% is too much work, then use 35%... whatever... but stop ignoring this please, and make your list complete, lol

EDIT...
Just how long are you going to make me wait???

PS- i hit a new high score for myself today... 3081
but sadly it's no longer notable enough for this thread

JOHNNYROCKET24 · Post by **JOHNNYROCKET24** » Sat Apr 04, 2009 8:39 am

*

a new star has been created. It will be used for any player with a current relative rank of a "noob farmer". This will highlight players that have a top 100 score but played easy opponents to achieve it.

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Sat Apr 04, 2009 8:56 am

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:*

a new star has been created. It will be used for any player with a current relative rank of a "noob farmer". This will highlight players that have a top 100 score but played easy opponents to achieve it.

Just as a constructive criticism, Herpes score is so high that his relative rank means that he has played mostly lieutenants, so are you classifying anyone that is lieutenant and below is a noob?

JOHNNYROCKET24 · Post by **JOHNNYROCKET24** » Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:05 am

nagerous wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:*

a new star has been created. It will be used for any player with a current relative rank of a "noob farmer". This will highlight players that have a top 100 score but played easy opponents to achieve it.
Just as a constructive criticism, Herpes score is so high that his relative rank means that he has played mostly lieutenants, so are you classifying anyone that is lieutenant and below is a noob?

it means when you run map on a player and his relative rank is called a "noob farmer", he gets a pink star.

King_Herpes · Post by **King_Herpes** » Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:08 am

Hey cool, another well deserved star! Just remember to give me that red one in a month or so JR. I'll be the only person to have all 4, then you'll have a new record to strive for. Thanks buddy.

JOHNNYROCKET24 · Post by **JOHNNYROCKET24** » Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:10 am

King_Herpes wrote:Hey cool, another well deserved star! Just remember to give me that red one in a month or so JR. I'll be the only person to have all 4, then you'll have a new record to strive for. Thanks buddy.

looking forward to it.

Robinette · Post by **Robinette** » Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:39 am

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:*

a new star has been created. It will be used for any player with a current relative rank of a "noob farmer". This will highlight players that have a top 100 score but played easy opponents to achieve it.

well done JR... another excellent addition to this old list...

so now i must ask again that question that continues to be ignored...
how long must i wait till you add an asterisk to denote those who are on this list with a LOW win % ?

JOHNNYROCKET24 · Post by **JOHNNYROCKET24** » Sat Apr 04, 2009 3:32 pm

Robinette wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:*

a new star has been created. It will be used for any player with a current relative rank of a "noob farmer". This will highlight players that have a top 100 score but played easy opponents to achieve it.

well done JR... another excellent addition to this old list...

so now i must ask again that question that continues to be ignored...
how long must i wait till you add an asterisk to denote those who are on this list with a LOW win % ?

you answered your own question. Why reward for a low win percentage? Thats like getting a medal for 10th place.

TheBro · Post by **TheBro** » Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:50 pm

Well having a score that makes your list while having a low win percentage is quite an achievement. I think that is what he was going for.

Bruceswar · Post by **Bruceswar** » Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:16 pm

Actually low win percentage just means you play standard multiplayer games. Which is great in its own right.

prismsaber · Post by **prismsaber** » Sun Apr 05, 2009 12:00 am

JR,

I heard you were lamenting about the lack of work. Good thing I saved this from a few days ago.

JOHNNYROCKET24 · Post by **JOHNNYROCKET24** » Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:42 am

Bruceswar wrote:Actually low win percentage just means you play standard multiplayer games. Which is great in its own right.

right...so where does it end? A star for having a high win rate for 1 vs 1's. Im not interested in game types.

FredVIII · Post by **FredVIII** » Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:54 am

so do i stay on this scoreboard or whats up?

JOHNNYROCKET24 · Post by **JOHNNYROCKET24** » Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:27 am

FredVIII wrote:so do i stay on this scoreboard or whats up?

lol- this is for the top 100 scores of all time

FredVIII · Post by **FredVIII** » Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:28 am

i know.

JOHNNYROCKET24 · Post by **JOHNNYROCKET24** » Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:29 am

FredVIII wrote:i know.

well if you knew that than you would have never asked that question

Bruceswar · Post by **Bruceswar** » Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:46 pm

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
FredVIII wrote:i know.
well if you knew that than you would have never asked that question

Do you know who he is?

JOHNNYROCKET24 · Post by **JOHNNYROCKET24** » Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:51 pm

Bruceswar wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
FredVIII wrote:i know.
well if you knew that than you would have never asked that question

Do you know who he is?

I do now. Hes not getting credit for points from another account.

Bruceswar · Post by **Bruceswar** » Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:59 pm

here is an update for you...

Username:
comic boy
Rank:
General General
Score:
3806

Chariot of Fire · Post by **Chariot of Fire** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:45 am

I reached 3,897 on 28th March. I'll likely not get that close again so a little bump up the table would be nice, thanks.

JOHNNYROCKET24 · Post by **JOHNNYROCKET24** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:29 am

Chariot of Fire wrote:I reached 3,897 on 28th March. I'll likely not get that close again so a little bump up the table would be nice, thanks.

I know your score was soaring at that time and I was updating it daily. Do you have a screenshot ?

Velvecarrots · Post by **Velvecarrots** » Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:30 am

If nothing else he's currently 3813.

comic boy · Post by **comic boy** » Fri Apr 10, 2009 3:18 am

Im now 3855

Chariot of Fire · Post by **Chariot of Fire** » Fri Apr 10, 2009 3:44 pm

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
Chariot of Fire wrote:I reached 3,897 on 28th March. I'll likely not get that close again so a little bump up the table would be nice, thanks.
I know your score was soaring at that time and I was updating it daily. Do you have a screenshot ?

I don't JR, sorry. To be honest I'd always assumed there was something that showed you what max score someone had reached. I made the above post, and only afterwards did I look at p.1 and read the small print re making a record of it.

Not really sure how and if I can make a screenshot. I spend most of my time on CC having to reboot coz this dinosaur of a PC freezes most times I go into forum or play a game on a big map. Drives me nuts (but keeps the wife happy)

Si

CC'S ALL TIME TOP 100 SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Re: CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES