Moderator: Community Team
Thank God. so I am not crazy. I would like to know what happened to Wicked between her post that it was a good idea to vote Andy and the post a page later where she said anyone pushing to vote andy is obviously mafia??!vgmmaster wrote:Nyvek wrote:@Andy
I'm not going to vote Andy because it's just a theory and there's no proof that I'm right, but he does deserve at least a FOS in my opinion.
FOS: Andy
I was the one who misconstrued Andy's statements about him being immune to a lynching. Rereading it, it is clear that he was confident he wouldn't be lynched because of info he has (similar to mach setting the trap for red bull- it makes a pretty clear case)....and that he didn't mean its impossible to lynch him. So once Andy clarified what he meant testing him through lynching wouldn't be a good thing. Anyway, if I am reading past hints correctly, I understand how Andy would get out of a lynching, but as has been stated repeatedly revealing too much important info will generally hurt the town and give hints to the mafia. So I won't say which seemingly innocent person Andy knows about.HoussamTheGreat wrote:vgmmaster wrote:Thank God. so I am not crazy. I would like to know what happened to Wicked between her post that it was a good idea to vote Andy and the post a page later where she said anyone pushing to vote andy is obviously mafia??!Nyvek wrote:@Andy
I'm not going to vote Andy because it's just a theory and there's no proof that I'm right, but he does deserve at least a FOS in my opinion.
FOS: Andy
The only thing in between was Andy spreading some more BS about not really being immune to lynching (suddenly) - and the valuable information he posseses that is the guarantee that we will believe him and not vote him - valuable information which of course, he cannot share for fear to expose someone!
WHY IN THE HELL ARE WE LETTING HIM SLIDE WITH THIS CRAP??
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Well I am glad I entertain you O great one - or should I say Don Andy?AndyDufresne wrote: And Houssam's quip about letting me slide with all this 'crap'...rather amusing.
If the last vote counts are correct, it'd look something like that.AK_iceman wrote:Vote Count
9 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch
- [5] reverend_kyle -- (Senfive, Wicked, Sully800, redbull, moz976)
- [2] AndyDufresne -- (Nyvek, HoussamTheGreat)
- [1] Senfive -- (reverend_kyle)
- [8] Not Voting, Everyone Else
Day Deadline: 20 Feb 2007 7:56 PM GMT.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.