Page 5 of 7

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 4:19 pm
by freakns
denominator wrote:
barterer2002 wrote:OK so here's where we are. denominator is going to be one of the two wild card eliminations in this round (1 win total). there will be a tiebreaker game in Region 3 to determine who the automatic elimination in that group is (from whichever of them doesn't get a win this round).
lol so that tie-breaker game between Woodruff and I really didn't matter - whoever won was going to be the wild card elimination regardless!
yeah :(
end even thou this favours me pretty much, i have to say, im not all for it. simple fact barterer changed rules during tournament puts a little shadow over it... well, regardless, im still planning on winning it :)

EDIT:
table of wins:
1. keiths31 7(2)
2. dinustef 6
3.-4. Jack_Strap, freakns 5
5.-7. Portmangray, Zorbas, Tripitaka 4
8. Serbia 3(2)
9. amazzony 3(1)
10. Guderian09 3
11. lordnex 2(2)
12. Mikalf 1(2)

id say dinustef and keiths31 doesnt need to worry about tiebreaker if they make through fourth round. Jack_Strap and i are also in good situation. everyone else, it will be rough...

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 6:28 pm
by barterer2002
I won't disagree with that. If I weren't an idiot they wouldn't have had to change however, the way they were written wasn't going to happen in the math.

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 1:40 pm
by freakns
keiths31 won 4th game! :shock:
=D> =D> =D>

one more left, keiths31, serbia and lordnex are still alive and cards worth is 35 now... so its one, maybe two turns until Berlin is over, so group 3 can enter tiebreaker(at least 3 if not all 4 will enter tiebreaker :? )

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 2:29 pm
by keiths31
Well my dice failed miserably...will not be winning this game now

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 11:41 am
by barterer2002
I have created the tiebreaker game and sent it to the two players who will definately be in it pending the finish of the final game of set 3.

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 10:34 am
by Serbia
I just won this game. So I guess I'll be advancing! :D

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 11:10 am
by barterer2002
Serbia wrote:I just won this game. So I guess I'll be advancing! :D
You still have a chance at the wild card elimination (although I write this without looking at the totals here)

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 11:17 am
by barterer2002
OK so here's where we are. Group 3 tiebreaker games are sent out. Mikalf is going to be eliminated one way or the other but this game will determine which of the other two are elimianted. The first person eliminated from the tiebreaker is the automatic elimination from Round 3 and we'll then move onto the wildcard tiebreaker. If Mikalf is not the first eliminated in the tiebreaker game then he will be the wild card elimination due to fewest remaining wins (1). If, however, Mikalf is eliminated first then lordnex will have the fewest remaining wins (2) and will be eliminated.

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 11:27 am
by freakns
barterer2002 wrote:OK so here's where we are. Group 3 tiebreaker games are sent out. Mikalf is going to be eliminated one way or the other but this game will determine which of the other two are elimianted. The first person eliminated from the tiebreaker is the automatic elimination from Round 3 and we'll then move onto the wildcard tiebreaker. If Mikalf is not the first eliminated in the tiebreaker game then he will be the wild card elimination due to fewest remaining wins (1). If, however, Mikalf is eliminated first then lordnex will have the fewest remaining wins (2) and will be eliminated.
so, basically, the only difference will be if amazzony is first one out? then lordnex will advance and Mikalf will be out due to the fewest wins so far... and just to be said, Mikalf is last time see around here 5 days ago, so he might be out already... man, this stuff is complicated :? :D

anyhow, full table of wins so far as we are going to need this one for final elimination:
1. keiths31 8
2. dinustef 6
3.-4. Jack_Strap, freakns 5
5.-8. Portmangray, Zorbas, Tripitaka, Serbia 4
9.-10. amazzony, Guderian09 3
11. lordnex 2
12. Mikalf 1

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 1:55 pm
by barterer2002
You have it right, if Mikalf doesnt' show up for the tiebreaker then he forfeits and becomes the automatic out for the group.

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 2:09 am
by freakns
barterer2002 wrote:You have it right, if Mikalf doesnt' show up for the tiebreaker then he forfeits and becomes the automatic out for the group.
and lordnex is out due to the total wins tiebreaking rule and he and amazzony doesnt even have to play tiebreker :)

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 7:07 pm
by Serbia
barterer2002 wrote:
Serbia wrote:I just won this game. So I guess I'll be advancing! :D
You still have a chance at the wild card elimination (although I write this without looking at the totals here)
So am I safe then, or not?

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 10:02 pm
by barterer2002
Right the tiebreaker is to determine the automatic elimination from the group. If one of the players forfeits it, that player becomes the automatic elimiantion. Once that is determined we go to the wildcard which (assuming the game isn't played) would be lordnex.

And yes, Serb, you are safe for this round but you're going to need some wins in the next round.

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 1:51 am
by lordnex
lol, this is a joke, right? :)

So.. Mikalf does not have any chance of advancing - even if he does show up and wins the tiebreaker??? Then, why would he even, show up? I woudn't in his place...

.. and if he does not show up, I am eliminated and amazzony advance without winning a game in this round?

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 2:10 am
by freakns
lordnex wrote:Then, why would he even, show up? I woudn't in his place...
because of some thing called fair play :p
lordnex wrote:.. and if he does not show up, I am eliminated and amazzony advance without winning a game in this round?
well, its not like you won any game in this round :D

and i already said, i dont like changing rules in the middle of the tournament, but it actually came out pretty fair this time as the two eliminates after added tiebreaker are denominator and either you or Miklaf. neither of you have won a game. so next time, you might accept the fact that i am a CC mistermind, bow to me and ask me nicely how to play. then i might help you. and yeah, one more thing. dont ever, never say a name of Bruce Cantpasskowski, try to explain people he isnt as bad as he is, or pretend to know anything about NFL. you still may cheer for Bucs althoug you arent presenting us in good spirit :P

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 3:49 pm
by freakns
still waiting for Mikalf?

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 4:13 pm
by barterer2002
I'm actually updating right not. I've declared Mikalf in forfeit making him the auto elimintee in that region and lordnex the wild card elimination. Mikalf hasn't signed onto CC in a week so we're going to move on without him.

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 4:17 pm
by barterer2002
There were 10 items in your list. Here they are in random order:

1. dinustef
2. keiths31
3. Guderian09
4. freakns
5. Jack_Strap
6. Zorbas
7. Tripitaka
8. Portmangray
9. Serbia
10. amazzony

Timestamp: 2009-05-14 21:16:52 UTC

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 11:29 am
by barterer2002
Reminders are out.

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 3:37 am
by freakns
we finally started semifinals! heres to hoping all the games will be lying, manipulating and backstabbing as they usually are :D

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Thu May 21, 2009 10:31 am
by freakns
hello finals, here i come! :D
4887549 won by me ;)

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 11:08 am
by barterer2002
freakns is still the only player with a win in either semifinals matchup.

Wild Card standings

1. keiths31 8
2-3. dinustef, freakns 6
4. Jack_Strap,5
5.-8. Portmangray, Zorbas, Tripitaka, Serbia 4
9.-10. amazzony, Guderian09 3

Essentially freakns assures himself of a finals seat unless his group splits the 5 games with all 5 players winning once and then becomes the first player out in the group's tiebreaker.

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 3:37 pm
by freakns
barterer2002 wrote:freakns is still the only player with a win in either semifinals matchup.

Wild Card standings

1. keiths31 8
2-3. dinustef, freakns 6
4. Jack_Strap,5
5.-8. Portmangray, Zorbas, Tripitaka, Serbia 4
9.-10. amazzony, Guderian09 3

Essentially freakns assures himself of a finals seat unless his group splits the 5 games with all 5 players winning once and then becomes the first player out in the group's tiebreaker.
well, i guess ill just win at least another one to avoid complications :)

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 7:42 am
by dinustef
I won 4887550

Group 1
dinustef 1/3
keiths 0/3
Guderian 0/3
freakns 1/4
Jack_Strap 0/3

Wild Card standings
1. keiths 8
2. dinustef 7
3. freakns 6
4. Jack_Strap 5
5.-8. Portmangray, Zorbas, Tripitaka, Serbia 4
9.-10. amazzony, Guderian09 3

Re: The Serbian Conquest

Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 1:41 pm
by barterer2002
So as long as you don't each win one in your grouping we'll see you in the finals too.