Jewel of the Empire coordinates & xml (new xml?)
Moderator: Cartographers
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
-
Contrickster
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:24 pm
Nineth draft.

I'm going to leave the Desert and Mountains for now. (If you have any ideas for them though, still listening to suggestions!)

Changed Himalayas to gold/yellow.
Mugals didn't have a blur but it did look blurry - changed legend to make it more visible.

I'm going to leave the Desert and Mountains for now. (If you have any ideas for them though, still listening to suggestions!)
Removed jewel, made font brighter, with background. Don't know how much more I can do with the position of Brahmaputra and Calcutta within the horizontal style.Remove the jewel at the top.
Change the green hills. Not easy to see.
Make the font at the bottom right stand out a bit more from the ocean.
Calcutta / Brahmaputra place more obvious.
Just me, but I don't like the alternating sea route dots.
Don't think I can reincorporate clouds back into the design. Anyone else want the clouds & floating look back? There has been a serious move toward Asian landmass in comments.prefered floating look
Jewel gone. I'm a crummy artist...-i like the straightened names
-id say ditch the jewels in the title, maybe if you want a jewel do a more cartoon or drawn version? which kinda matches the pastel/cartoonish feel of the map....it seems out of place.
-id change the light blue bonus area so it isnt so similar in color to the ocean, it almost looks like a lake or river or something...light blue is ok, just vary it a little more...
-legend looks much more readable...does 'mugals' have a blur on it though? it seems harder to read than the rest of the legend...
Changed Himalayas to gold/yellow.
Mugals didn't have a blur but it did look blurry - changed legend to make it more visible.
River would clutter up the map as it's not needed for a border. I've alluded to rivers and geography with the names of some territories.i wish the Ganges river was i there, it is after all, a hindu goddess.
What do you think of the Indian elephant instead?I like the jewel in the corner, but I think you should change it to the hope diamond; it came from India and it's more famous.
- Evil DIMwit
- Posts: 1616
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:47 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Philadelphia, NJ
-
Contrickster
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:24 pm
-
Contrickster
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:24 pm
Texture and font can be changed. Do you like the new yellow colour for Himalayas?mibi wrote:the new texture is definitely not an improvement! also I cannot red the white on yellow text at all. i also preferred the dots. The new colors are burning a hole in my eyes. This map has gone backwards!
I like the elephant tho.
-
Contrickster
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:24 pm
-
Contrickster
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:24 pm
- Evil DIMwit
- Posts: 1616
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:47 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Philadelphia, NJ
Quite a nice map, I must say. I particularly like this slightly crinkly, but otherwise flat style.
That said I think the look would be improved if the mountain and desert barriers fit better with the solid-color-crinky-bold-outline style, or at least covered the border they were on rather than standing on the territories themselves.
That said I think the look would be improved if the mountain and desert barriers fit better with the solid-color-crinky-bold-outline style, or at least covered the border they were on rather than standing on the territories themselves.
-
Contrickster
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:24 pm
Is a mod able to put a poll up for the Elephant?
Next update I'll put them all on the borders. Not sure what you mean by "fit better with the solid-color-crinky-bold-outline style"... you mean give the features a texture?Evil DIMwit wrote:Quite a nice map, I must say. I particularly like this slightly crinkly, but otherwise flat style.
That said I think the look would be improved if the mountain and desert barriers fit better with the solid-color-crinky-bold-outline style, or at least covered the border they were on rather than standing on the territories themselves.
-I think the mountains/deserts just arent cutting it...i think you need to try a new technique or style than you have been trying...something totally different...
-i like the dots for the sea routes
-I think you could do more with the black background on the legend...just doesnt look very 'finished'
-i like the dots for the sea routes
-I think you could do more with the black background on the legend...just doesnt look very 'finished'
my new site - http://www.spritestitch.com/ - A video game craft weblog...
- Evil DIMwit
- Posts: 1616
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:47 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Philadelphia, NJ
Well, if you look at the map, nothing's really three-dimensional. All the territories are just solid color, with the black or white outline, and that texture. The mountains, on the other hand, are all 3D-ish gradient triangles, which doesn't quite flow with the rest of the map.Contrickster wrote:Is a mod able to put a poll up for the Elephant?
Next update I'll put them all on the borders. Not sure what you mean by "fit better with the solid-color-crinky-bold-outline style"... you mean give the features a texture?Evil DIMwit wrote:Quite a nice map, I must say. I particularly like this slightly crinkly, but otherwise flat style.
That said I think the look would be improved if the mountain and desert barriers fit better with the solid-color-crinky-bold-outline style, or at least covered the border they were on rather than standing on the territories themselves.
-
Contrickster
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:24 pm
Here's some line borders...

I feel out of ideas now and feel I'm going round in circles. There has been no discussion of the borders and game play at all. Does this mean it is great as it is? Or does it mean it's rubbish? Obviously I don't want to go through all this hassle over presentation if it's going to be rejected on gameplay.

I feel out of ideas now and feel I'm going round in circles. There has been no discussion of the borders and game play at all. Does this mean it is great as it is? Or does it mean it's rubbish? Obviously I don't want to go through all this hassle over presentation if it's going to be rejected on gameplay.
-
Contrickster
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:24 pm
I agree.boberz wrote:now the legend looks really stupid
I hate this map now., too I don't seem able to get the presentation above a certain standard. It's just different grades of crap.
I'm going to have tostart again.
Does a map maker have suggestion on what techniques I may not be using that would this map's development?
How about shadow? I use Fireworks/GIMP.
I've a problem with using Fireworks on this computer though, it can only handle about 8 layers before slowing to a crash. What I have done is transfered files to GIMP which can handle many layers. Should I be doing this? Is any data lost in the process? Going from png > xcf and then to jpg?
-
Contrickster
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:24 pm
Re: India: the Jewel in the Empire - #12 06/04/07
12
mistake bbl
mistake bbl
-
Contrickster
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:24 pm
Re: India: the Jewel in the Empire - #12 06/04/07
What do you think now?


- Guiscard
- Posts: 4103
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:27 pm
- Location: In the bar... With my head on the bar
Background is pretty dark. I preffered the last one in terms of visuals, but i don't actually think it should be free floating, as it were. I'd rather see the actual land.
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.


