Conquer Club

Should people be allowed to have guns?

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Should people be allowed to have guns?

Poll ended at Tue Sep 26, 2006 8:32 pm

 
Total votes : 0

Postby OwlLawyer on Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:52 pm

You also have the freedom to learn proper grammar and spelling.
Image
User avatar
Corporal OwlLawyer
 
Posts: 305
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Banging hendys mom

Postby thephule77 on Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:54 pm

now looking at autoload's avatar, I think only people who have good eysight and are not wearing eyepatches should be allowed to have guns
User avatar
Private thephule77
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Earth

Postby Bozo on Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:57 pm

The worst statistik i have ever heard about guns ( i dont even think it's true) "You are more likly to shoot someone you care about than a criminal"

Any coments on this one would be interseting also in this argument i have heard i believe one statistic that is remotly acurate thats the in the us 30,000 people get killed by guns annually
Dead to Me: New York Intellectuals, Men with Beards, California's 50th District, Heather Clark, Bowtie Pasta, Owls, CNN en Espanol, Screw-Cap Wines, Cast of Friends,
Toronto Raptors
User avatar
Cadet Bozo
 
Posts: 585
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 2:18 pm
Location: Alberta

Postby OwlLawyer on Mon Aug 28, 2006 1:00 pm

Bozo wrote:The worst statistik i have ever heard about guns ( i dont even think it's true) "You are more likly to shoot someone you care about than a criminal"


Well, first of all... it's "statistic"

Second of all, that statistic, without some explanation, is meaningless. If they mean purposely shoot someone you care about, well, not sure what to say about that, not sure if that is true.

If it means accidentally shoot someone you care about, then yeah, that would probably be true, because you are more likely to be around those you care about, so any accidental shooting would more likely involve a loved one.
Image
User avatar
Corporal OwlLawyer
 
Posts: 305
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Banging hendys mom

Postby Master Bush on Mon Aug 28, 2006 1:22 pm

"You know what they say about Love and War...."
"Yeah, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's War."
User avatar
Sergeant Master Bush
 
Posts: 2387
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 10:50 pm

Postby Machiavelli on Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:00 pm

I think the should stop allowing pistols, and other small guns to be sold, aswell as the bullets for these small guns.

Then make it illegal to have them aswell.


I dont have a problem with the big rifles or shotguns, because if someone is walking down the street with it, you are going to know it.

People would be allowed to own rifles and shotguns, so if a criminal does break into your house, you can defend your self.

Hunting would also not be a problem, because nothing there would change.

I know this is a bit idealistic but this is the best solution that I have and I think if some minor kinks were worked out, this system would be good.
Sergeant Machiavelli
 
Posts: 2021
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 7:34 pm

Postby Utafar on Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:03 pm

yeah except for the part where people end up having fire fights in there houses when a guy breaks in with an AK-47 instead of a handgun


RT anyone?
Sergeant 1st Class Utafar
 
Posts: 1360
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:10 pm
Location: A computer

Postby OwlLawyer on Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:30 pm

Machiavelli wrote: if some minor kinks were worked out, this system would be good.


Yeah, because criminals would never saw off a shotgun, or obtain illegal handguns. :roll:
Image
User avatar
Corporal OwlLawyer
 
Posts: 305
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Banging hendys mom

Postby Rook38 on Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:34 pm

No guns. People say i'm so annoying that they will shoot me, if guns r banned i don't have to worry about this any more :D
User avatar
Corporal Rook38
 
Posts: 208
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Germany

Postby foutballfreek15 on Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:36 pm

No because i'll beat you w/ a bat, and guns should be legal because i hunt and i want to keep hunting.
User avatar
Cadet foutballfreek15
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:41 pm
Location: Norway

Postby Utafar on Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:44 pm

foutballfreek15 wrote:No because i'll beat you w/ a bat, and guns should be legal because i hunt and i want to keep hunting.




thats definatly not selfish
Sergeant 1st Class Utafar
 
Posts: 1360
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:10 pm
Location: A computer

Postby Rook38 on Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:48 pm

foutballfreek15 what happend to ur avatar?
User avatar
Corporal Rook38
 
Posts: 208
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Germany

Postby Cheesemore on Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:53 pm

two things
1) you spelled allowed wrong
2) it says in the constitution that we are allowed fire arms, but I really don't care about this subject
Leader of the Gridiron Gang
Proud Member of Conquer Club
cena-rules wrote:Cheese is the most valuble thing in the world
User avatar
Private Cheesemore
 
Posts: 1213
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 9:13 pm
Location: Doing what I like, and Liking what I do

Postby foutballfreek15 on Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:41 pm

I changed it to a picture of kentucky lake.
Go Norway!
User avatar
Cadet foutballfreek15
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:41 pm
Location: Norway

Postby Caleb the Cruel on Mon Aug 28, 2006 6:13 pm

I like this law they have here in Colorado called the 'Make My Day Law'
it allows for homeowners to shoot, even to death, anyone who enters their home if the homeowner feels threatened
this has decreased the rate of break-ins statewide
people here are also allowed to have conceiled weapons if they have a permit to do such
there is a 9mm in our pick-up, just in case we ever need it
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Caleb the Cruel
 
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 8:36 pm
Location: Northern Colorado

Postby P Gizzle on Mon Aug 28, 2006 7:13 pm

that's a pretty good law. how has the death toll been affected. is it more cuz people are more likely to have guns, or les cuz no one is trying to break into homes?
Gridiron Gang- CC's largest Clan!
User avatar
Cook P Gizzle
 
Posts: 4100
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Somewhere being absolutely AWESOME!

Postby Rook38 on Mon Aug 28, 2006 8:16 pm

Without the "Make My Day Law", a rober can enter a home illigaly, and sue the owner for harm to his body
User avatar
Corporal Rook38
 
Posts: 208
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Germany

Postby Utafar on Mon Aug 28, 2006 9:45 pm

Rook38 wrote:Without the "Make My Day Law", a rober can enter a home illigaly, and sue the owner for harm to his body


thats bullshit beyond which i have ever seen in my 15 years of life
Sergeant 1st Class Utafar
 
Posts: 1360
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:10 pm
Location: A computer

Postby Caleb the Cruel on Mon Aug 28, 2006 9:50 pm

Utafar wrote:
Rook38 wrote:Without the "Make My Day Law", a rober can enter a home illigaly, and sue the owner for harm to his body


thats bullshit beyond which i have ever seen in my 15 years of life

that's why I'm glad I'm in colorado where they do have the make my day law


P gizzle-- i'm not sure on the exact stats on how this affected the death toll however i'm sure you find a site about this from some search engine
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Caleb the Cruel
 
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 8:36 pm
Location: Northern Colorado

Postby DIRESTRAITS on Mon Aug 28, 2006 11:13 pm

The Constitution says we can have guns
YOur opinion doesn't matter
User avatar
Private 1st Class DIRESTRAITS
 
Posts: 1029
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Smacking everyone who says Oreeegone

Postby vtmarik on Tue Aug 29, 2006 12:53 am

The constitution, when it was created, was worded very carefully to avoid misinterpretations in the future. However, they do happen. There really isn't any ambiguity in the second amendment:

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

If the guns were only meant to be used by a militia, then why is the line "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" included? This amendment was made in accordance with the rules of this nation, that should the government ever fail in its ability to represent the people that it should be dismantled and replaced with a new government. Such a dismantling of a corrupt government would, inevitably, lead to war. The second amendment was put in place to ensure that the government wouldn't restrict the people's access to arms in the case of such an event.
Initiate discovery! Fire the Machines! Throw the switch Igor! THROW THE F***ING SWITCH!
User avatar
Cadet vtmarik
 
Posts: 3863
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 9:51 am
Location: Riding on the waves of fear and loathing.

reply

Postby Capt Killroy on Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:30 pm

all law abiding people have the right to bear arms and shoot that motherfcker whos tring to do harm to his family
Image
User avatar
Corporal Capt Killroy
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:54 am

Postby cowshrptrn on Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:44 pm

DIRESTRAITS wrote:The Constitution says we can have guns
YOur opinion doesn't matter


The 2nd amendment is jsut that, an amendment jsut like prohibition (19th i think...) the whole point of them is to evolve with the times, since we no longer need them to drive indians off their land (we use lawyers and Jack Abramoff now) and a lot of people live in the city now and dont' need to shoot rabid wolves that attack their livestock.

Older people's gun deaths are most likely to be suicides. Suicides typically make up 56.5% of all gun deaths according to the Bureau Of Justice Statistics. In fact, drugs and suicides account for more than 2 out of every 3 gun deaths in the USA.


Los Angeles TImes wrote:In 1996 there were over 34,000 gun deaths in the U.S.


yeah 20,000+ deaths are def. worth the handful of robberies that were prevented. (btw, overdoses on pills etc are typically less successful as far as suicide's concerned)
Image
User avatar
Private cowshrptrn
 
Posts: 838
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 1:15 pm
Location: wouldn't YOU like to know....

Postby OwlLawyer on Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:46 pm

Cow - most of those deaths are illegal, criminals killing people, not accidental shootings....

if you outlaw guns, how will the problem be solved? It's already illegal to kill with guns, you think criminals will just turn in their guns?
Image
User avatar
Corporal OwlLawyer
 
Posts: 305
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Banging hendys mom

Postby jay_a2j on Tue Aug 29, 2006 2:09 pm

Los Angeles TImes wrote:In 1996 there were over 34,000 gun deaths in the U.S.


yeah 20,000+ deaths are def. worth the handful of robberies that were prevented. (btw, overdoses on pills etc are typically less successful as far as suicide's concerned)




Lets see, 4000 abortions a day in the US means 1,460,000 children killed each year in the US alone. Guns aren't the problem.
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

PreviousNext

Return to Out, out, brief candle!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users