Aerial Attack wrote:Congrats DiM !!!
And, as promised - I've started a tourney to be played on this map
This tourney needs SEVEN players (of 54) you guys should rock at this map !!!
Moderator: Cartographers
Aerial Attack wrote:Congrats DiM !!!
And, as promised - I've started a tourney to be played on this map
Coleman wrote:It looks to be about a 40% chance one of those castles can kill the other right away. If you removed the bridge that allowed that it would be a 20% chance which is still higher than I would like. (And it would break all the current games)
I think we may need to raise the neutral army count on Qy, Nyt, and Bef but I'm not sure by how much. If they were all 6 it would make them comparable to the odds of other castles killing each other but that seems a bit high.
If you jumped Chu, Nyt, Wun and Qy by 2 each that would probably solve the problem in a less obtrusive way. Meaning the territories don't look so impossible to take people never want them, but it would discourage this maneuver.
It's still risky as it is now. 60% chance of leaving a nice trail of 1s to yourself... Even then it still screws the other 4 players if these two castles fight right away like that.
Gilligan wrote:I played 4 1v1s, and didn't lose any
rebelman wrote:Coleman wrote:It looks to be about a 40% chance one of those castles can kill the other right away. If you removed the bridge that allowed that it would be a 20% chance which is still higher than I would like. (And it would break all the current games)
its important to not judg too quickly - this guy obviously had haunted attacking dice - that said i know which castles i want to start from if this is not changed
Coleman wrote:rebelman wrote:Coleman wrote:It looks to be about a 40% chance one of those castles can kill the other right away. If you removed the bridge that allowed that it would be a 20% chance which is still higher than I would like. (And it would break all the current games)
its important to not judg too quickly - this guy obviously had haunted attacking dice - that said i know which castles i want to start from if this is not changed
It is mathematically a 40% chance, that's not acceptable. I'm not sure what you mean by judging too quickly...
DiM wrote:
that game would have been yours if you had attacked xi castle instead of wasting troops on neutrals. and leave yourself defenceless in front of the guy that had Xi
Users browsing this forum: LCol MacDonell