Moderator: Cartographers
Tisha wrote:unriggable wrote:That national park at bottom right is so weird, maybe you should unsquare it since I didn't think it was a territory at first.
it has always been a territory..that is the actually shape of the park down there
onbekende wrote:let me nitpick now so you won't have people nitpick when the map is out (great map, bonuswise good)
Small map, legend, Thurston Co. (needs that dot at the end)
you may even put a angry smiley in the post if you reply to this
oaktown wrote:i recognize that the small map does just meet the size limit, and i acknowledge that this concern has been raised before, but can it be any smaller? it's always nice when you can see the entire playing area and the attack boxes on your monitor without having to scroll.
Beyond that it's looking very good... still don't like those whales, but that's just my opinion.
Tisha wrote:oaktown wrote:i recognize that the small map does just meet the size limit, and i acknowledge that this concern has been raised before, but can it be any smaller? it's always nice when you can see the entire playing area and the attack boxes on your monitor without having to scroll.
Beyond that it's looking very good... still don't like those whales, but that's just my opinion.
when i scale it down..it just looks blurry. so how?
and if i did scale it down..wouldn't i have to completely redo all the coordinates for the small map on the xml?
hobs09 wrote:i just like to put it out there thatj i was the one that originally came up with this idea, except mine was a Seattle Map. But more props to this guy for actually going through with it.
206!!
I'm still checking the xml, recent bug quenches have made me a bit anal about it, so it takes me some time.wicked wrote:How about we spread the news to the CC world about this map by quenching it?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users