Moderator: Cartographers
mibi wrote:i think this is an excellent idea, however, i think it would be cool if every space had a chess piece that could attack in the manner of its piece. that way, it may not look like a usualy board but it would still take some of the critical thinking involved in chess.
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
The Weird One wrote:mibi wrote:i think this is an excellent idea, however, i think it would be cool if every space had a chess piece that could attack in the manner of its piece. that way, it may not look like a usualy board but it would still take some of the critical thinking involved in chess.
I agree, it's a good idea, but, if possible, it should have as much of actual chess incorporated into it as possible.
also, there shouldn't be a bonus for the empty squares (unless, maybe it's for once you have ALL of them)
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:Sorry I haven't posted in a while, I've been busy with school, college apps, and such. Looks like this map is making progress without me being here, which is great! I think the next step is to finalize what the rules will be.
It seems from the posts that the movement will go as follows:
-Pieces attack all empty squares they can normally move to, and any opposite color pieces in range.
-Empty squares attack the 4 adjacent squares.
We haven't really decided on the bonuses yet, though. Here is what I propose:
-All pieces start off neutral, and all players start on empty squares.
-+1 for each pawn, +2 for each bishop/knight/rook, +3 for each queen/king. These should be small, or else the game could quickly get very chaotic.
-+4 for holding all bishops, knights, or rooks.
-If King and Queen of a color are held, +2 for each piece of same color, and +1 for each empty square of same color.
Ideas are welcome.
A few notes for Keredrex:
-In a later draft of the map, I put a black pawn on B2. This is a good idea for two reasons: it gives the blank squares in the upper left corner more access, and it endangers the white queen even more. I recommend you do this, unless you have a reason not to.
-Remember to put john9blue on the map somewhere, I'd like credit for my idea. I figured you were gonna do this anyway, just wanted to make sure.
-You, sir, are awesome, and have been a huge supporter of this map. Thanks!
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:Thoughts on the new map?
DiM wrote:1. the frame you used is copyrighted by stockphoto. get rid of it.
2. you're still working in paint. because i admire your efforts i feel the need to urge you to learn a better software. until you do that you'll never get this map quenched. paint simply sux no matter how talented you are.
Coleman wrote:We could make you eat those words, but I'll hold back... For now...DiM wrote:paint simply sux no matter how talented you are.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
qwert wrote:Hes what i see:
2.Who size of board is for White and who size is for Black?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users