Moderator: Cartographers
oaktown wrote:I'm only on round two of a game on this map, and so far I can tell that it's smart in its gameplay and beautiful to look at. But while the territory names are well thought out and somewhat helpful, the map is still very dependent on subtle colors. As one of the site's colorblind users, I'm constantly going back to the XML to see which territories make up which bonuses. Chicago is especially tough, as I'm just guessing which station I'm placing on and attacking.
I know, my bad for going away all summer and entirely missing this map go through the Foundry process.
oaktown wrote:I'm only on round two of a game on this map, and so far I can tell that it's smart in its gameplay and beautiful to look at. But while the territory names are well thought out and somewhat helpful, the map is still very dependent on subtle colors. As one of the site's colorblind users, I'm constantly going back to the XML to see which territories make up which bonuses. Chicago is especially tough, as I'm just guessing which station I'm placing on and attacking.
I know, my bad for going away all summer and entirely missing this map go through the Foundry process.
Seinfreak wrote:Wow, so that information IS there!
I swear, I read and re-read that legend 3 or 4 times and overlooked that.
DiM wrote:why don't you use the greasemonkey? it shows all the armies with colorblind indicators plus it has a text map feature that shows what borders what and what are the bonuses made of. i think it would be much easier than to look at the xml.
xzmattzx wrote:It's "SacrAmento", not "Sacremento". I noticed that in the attack menu.
ga7 wrote:Just wanted to say, great work. I love the gameplay on this map, it's becoming one of my favorites.
I think the color changes to make it a bit less confusing is a very good idea, if it's doable. In addition to Casper's list, maybe Crescent in yellow and Sunset Limited in orange also?
hulmey wrote:i really like this map but its very confusing and i think the labelling could be done alot better....Maybe you could choose lettering and numbering....
I.e, Denver would be D1, D2,D3 and so on!!! It would require a small change but make it so easier to play
hulmey wrote:Thats quite disappointing because they both are gonna end up on the bottom with ireland and the rest.
How they are presented at the moment it just downright confusing!!
hulmey wrote:yeah the code is very simple and effective but when you come to the station and there are 3 stations in 1 its very hard to tell which is which without looking at the legend and then its still really difficulty.
We got a saying in my profession and its also a fact : 96% of customer's dont complain they just go elsewhere!!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users