Moderator: Cartographers
pepperonibread wrote:Just a thought, I averaged Samus's and WidowMakers's bonuses together, and this is what I got:
N. America - 5
S. America - 2
Europe - 5
Asia - 6
Australia - 2
Africa - 4
Antarctica - 5
I'd go with all of those except Africa, which I'd make 5.
that sounds really good actually except africa. (smiley invasion... MUWAHAHAHAHAH)pepperonibread wrote:Just a thought, I averaged Samus's and WidowMakers's bonuses together, and this is what I got:
N. America - 5
S. America - 2
Europe - 5
Asia - 6
Australia - 2
Africa - 4
Antarctica - 5
I'd go with all of those except Africa, which I'd make 5.
1st chair flute wrote:that sounds really good actually except africa. (smiley invasion... MUWAHAHAHAHAH)pepperonibread wrote:Just a thought, I averaged Samus's and WidowMakers's bonuses together, and this is what I got:
N. America - 5
S. America - 2
Europe - 5
Asia - 6
Australia - 2
Africa - 4
Antarctica - 5
I'd go with all of those except Africa, which I'd make 5.
nmhunate wrote:Speak English... It is the language that God wrote the bible in.
1st chair flute wrote:what? the smiles or the bonuses?
nmhunate wrote:Speak English... It is the language that God wrote the bible in.
fohr_fun wrote:Africa deserves less than Europe cause Africa needs to defend 3 spots and Europe 4. also a few more islands would be underwater like tristian and most of Hawaii if not all
pepperonibread wrote:Lt. Valerian wrote:Wait, floating cities? What is this, Water World? Also, who would expend the resources in this post-apocalyptic world to build these things especially in the South Indian Ocean?
first of all, its not a post-apocalyptic world. this amount of global warming would take place over hundreds of years, so its not like there are gonna be giant tidal waves that flood the coasts. and dont you think humans would EVENTUALLY see the threat and adapt a little? people could build off previously flooded islands so they wouldnt have to make the ports floating or start building off the ocean floor. and these ports wouldnt be huge cities or anything. they would be international ports for ships and aircraft. so, for my map, i took current, centralized islands and turned them into ports. and finally, in response to the comment about moscow being gone, cities like that could be saved, i just didnt see the point in putting a bunch of little major cities off the coast of every continent
and about playability. without the ports, it would just look even more like the classic map. thats actually the reason i put the ports and the uninhabitable zone in, so it would be different from classic
thegeneralpublic wrote:Just wondering, is Indian Ocean Port going to get a name? Sorry if I missed it, but 28 pages is a tad dense. If it is, somewhere in the BIO or Mauritius (if you moved it a touch) would be good.
onbekende wrote:for that name, "Nieuw Amsterdam" lies not far from it.
pepperonibread wrote:onbekende wrote:for that name, "Nieuw Amsterdam" lies not far from it.
Yeah, that's almost perfect. Wikipedia says it's currently known as Île Amsterdam.
zarvinny wrote:I honestly believe continent bonuses should be as small as possible for the bigger continents. That way, they will be easier to hold, since folks are usually not as angry about somebody having a bonus of 2 or something. In addition, this lax approach toward somebody holding big continents with small bonuses will make the bigger continents more attractive, thus balancing the game. As is the current precedent, there are generally 1 or 2 holdable continents for each map, and if anyone dare attempt take Europe they risk having the rest of the board turn on them.
just my opinion.
in conclusion Europe's bonus should be 3 or 4
wrightfan123 wrote:pepperonibread wrote:onbekende wrote:for that name, "Nieuw Amsterdam" lies not far from it.
Yeah, that's almost perfect. Wikipedia says it's currently known as Île Amsterdam.
I TOLD U IT COULD B RENAMED! BUT NOOOOOO, U NEVER LISTEN2ME... jk. great job, Wade.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users