Moderator: Community Team
Extreme Ways wrote:i learned nothing
Loose Canon wrote:I'm not sure on that rag, could be useful for town to know who, then when I die the strength or not of the evidence gets revealed.
So I was thinking of revealing late today?
Up for debate + whether I should have said what I have so far or not?
- still very much learning.
Loose Canon wrote:I'm not sure on that rag, could be useful for town to know who, then when I die the strength or not of the evidence gets revealed.
So I was thinking of revealing late today?
Up for debate + whether I should have said what I have so far or not?
- still very much learning.
Loose Canon wrote:I disagree Charle.
Ew Kong and Charle came out of the blocks saying didn't learn anything.
Onus is on each of you guys to throw around suspicions now then.
That's how I see it.
Loose Canon wrote:The downside of saying right now, who there is a degree of evidence of innocence wrt killing of fusi, is scum might have deflected and so might. have evidence whether deflection worked.
Don't see any upside saying right now except to satisfy your curiosity.
Loose Canon wrote:Nothing much is happening - so based on very light suspicion from end of D1 after Max's claim;
Vote Max
Votanic wrote:Sorry if I seem scattered. I got involved in a third mafia game called 'RL'.
I don't know who is modding it, but it has been wild!
I'll get read up by Friday or so.
...but since it's never a bad idea: Vote Max.
Loose Canon wrote:Actually max, I'd be reluctant to vote you if there's a better target.
I'm toying with idea of Ew, Kong or Charle because of their early nothing to report stuff.
Problem is that's 3 equally suss for same reason, whereas I'm mildly suss of you for a different reason.
Ragian wrote:@Max, any chance you'd answer my question instead of being butthurt that some are voting you?
Users browsing this forum: Loose Canon