saxitoxin wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:saxitoxin wrote:The tampon rules came up in debate on the bill to provide sanitary supplies in all schools. The Republican members added a rider to specific exclude boys restrooms. They didn't want boys learning about that stuff.
That's literally the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Literally the dumbest.
I think we triggered Saxi... Saxi is worried about what boys might learn from having access to tampons? I guess Saxi doesn't have sisters.
I've been courteous enough to be very honest about my opinions on Trump, despite the fact I support him.
It's dumb that you and the Hallelujah Chorus feel that, even here, you have to continue screaming the party cleanup line ("The tampons were so boys could do independent learning about menstruation and make GI Joe accessories with them!") Either you actually believe that - which makes you dumb - or you think Duk is dumb enough to, which is just rude.
Just say up is up and black is black. The tampons were there because Walz believes in a pseudoscientific perspective that thinks 12 year old girls can will themselves into becoming boys and if they have to go into the girls bathroom to get a tampon it will disprove it, which is somehow fascist; the same perspective that thinks girls who don't want 17 year old men showering with them in the locker room are literal Nazis, and that parental rights extend to having their 11 year old child's genitals carved off and thrown in a biowaste bin.
This is an honest area and no is going to accuse you of being a pedo simply for supporting a candidate who has legalized a particular child sexual fetish some adults have. You might agree or disagree with Walz on this and believe, in the balance, he's the better candidate. I've been honest about things I intensely disagree with Trump in (i.e. his support of Israeli genocide). So just be honest.
I do appreciate you candor on your opinion of Trump.
I personally don't conflate making free paper products available in both bathroom in case some gender confused kids need access, with the chopping off of 11 yo genitals. I do understand why people have a slippery slope mentality about this stuff, but sometimes providing free paper products is just providing free paper products.
If Walz for instance wrote a foreword in a 920 page instruction manual on how to change gov't from the inside out to take away cis peoples rights and slowly force everyone to live a trans lifestyle and sexually experiment with both genders while under gov't supervision and to change the constitution so that any pregnant woman can have in utero sex change operations, or abort their baby up to 8 years old I would 100% vote against the guy and say he's a liberal extremist and shouldn't be on the ticket... but really he just made paper products available free to anyone who may want them, which apparently was a popular enough idea in MN that the bill got through their state congress for him to sign. Personally, I'm fine with that.