Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Finally, I've found those people to be friendly and seem to enjoy my invites/games, or they wouldn't have played 3/5/10 games with me.
So why aren't you inviting more players like this?MSpitts24 wrote:Regarding "pretend in his own head he's not bad at risk": If I'm so bad, why did ShannonApple (Brig) resign, how can I split Hive vs Kaskavel (then a General?), or do (probably) above average vs Generals in 2v2's?
I didn't say you never make public games. I played two against you. It is implied via very basic English that the games I referred to in that sentence are the games being discussed in this thread."you aren't making public games and letting anyone join": totally wrong; I continually and regularly post games that are open to anybody*
The issue is very simply that you are routinely inviting low ranked players to your games because they're easy targets and allow you to maintain a high win %.Ranching: I think if you'll check, none/0.00% of my invited opponents have a "few" games; none are <10, <20, <50, <100 games. I'd thin Admin would agree that inviting people that have played more than 100 games is Ranching/Farming/cheasting
I'd thinK Admin would agree that inviting people that have played more than 100 games is NOT Ranching/Farming/chea(S)ting
MSpitts24 wrote:I can only invite people when I'm premium. Ask Admin: I am ~99% a freemium player that cannot invite people
I've gotten Premium periodically as a gift from Mods for a good joke, etc., others I've played (I think they wanted me to join their clan), and recently for nicely supporting a CC player I never played, but some clan person referred them to me for help (gave me 3 months Premium).
You posted minimal discussion with NKHolley, but not the others.
If I invited people with only 5-30 games, I might begin to understand your concern, but I haven't -- most have had SEVERAL HUNDRED
iAmCaffeine wrote:I'd thinK Admin would agree that inviting people that have played more than 100 games is NOT Ranching/Farming/chea(S)ting
You know people have been punished for tactically inviting players of all ranks to games? Even colonels and above, when they'd never played the map.
Jliverwurst just got a temporary ban for inviting low ranks to his games.
What are you basing your administration assumptions on exactly?
Son!c wrote:But a lot of new paid members that don't know this "subculture" of you guys are leaving CC, they just wanna have fun and play some games.
Son!c wrote:ok i'll leave you just convinced me
Shannon Apple wrote:Son!c wrote:ok i'll leave you just convinced me
I'm a volunteer. I am not a paid member of staff, so saying to me that you're going to leave the site is an over-reaction. If I had my way, some people in this section would have gotten infractions/official warnings for flaming and verbal abuse as they would if they did some of this in chat. But, the reports in themselves are valid once you strip away all the nonsense attached.
Son!c wrote:ok i'll leave you just convinced me, your not happy with the way that other thread played out but that is the way it is? I agree on his warning but he asked about the rules and he got an answer he followed by the letter.. and now he gets a punishment without breaking that advice because some drunk post? sorry, hard to understand
Shannon Apple wrote:Son!c wrote:ok i'll leave you just convinced me
I'm a volunteer. I am not a paid member of staff, so saying to me that you're going to leave the site is an over-reaction. If I had my way, some people in this section would have gotten infractions/official warnings for flaming and verbal abuse as they would if they did some of this in chat. But, the reports in themselves are valid once you strip away all the nonsense attached.
So let's try to keep this evidence based only. It's been waaaay off topic.
Shannon Apple wrote:If I had my way, some people in this section would have gotten infractions/official warnings for flaming and verbal abuse as they would if they did some of this in chat.
So let's try to keep this evidence based only. It's been waaaay off topic.
Son!c wrote:ok i'll leave you just convinced me, your not happy with the way that other thread played out but that is the way it is? I agree on his warning but he asked about the rules and he got an answer he followed by the letter.. and now he gets a punishment without breaking that advice because some drunk post? sorry, hard to understand
Users browsing this forum: No registered users