Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
iAmCaffeine wrote:If what you really care about is getting the new recruits to stay on the site, send them a PM. It's quicker, more personal and more efficient.
iAmCaffeine wrote:If what you really care about is getting the new recruits to stay on the site, send them a PM. It's quicker, more personal and more efficient.
IcePack wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:If what you really care about is getting the new recruits to stay on the site, send them a PM. It's quicker, more personal and more efficient.
Wouldnāt that give off pretty strong P@P farming vibes?
iAmCaffeine wrote:IcePack wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:If what you really care about is getting the new recruits to stay on the site, send them a PM. It's quicker, more personal and more efficient.
Wouldnāt that give off pretty strong P@P farming vibes?
That depends on the context of the message lol?
*Pixar* wrote:Honestly I don't get the whole farming thing, yes players are mostly inexperienced but some players come to the site knowing the basics about risk it's whether or not they stay for awhile is the problem. I do see ljex made an effort to talk to the new recruits in some games others not but hey I played against a new recruit the other day Game 19820098 and got my ass kicked. My first instinct was he was a multi! Theres no way! Well turns out he is clean. You may win some points but in the case of possibly finding a player who knows what he's doing, you could lose 40-50 pts in a game. Anyways my rant is over I'll let the C&A do their job.
ljex wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:IcePack wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:If what you really care about is getting the new recruits to stay on the site, send them a PM. It's quicker, more personal and more efficient.
Wouldnāt that give off pretty strong P@P farming vibes?
That depends on the context of the message lol?
I think you are actually kidding yourself that this would make you feel better about the situation of me playing new recruits.
iAmCaffeine wrote:ljex wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:IcePack wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:If what you really care about is getting the new recruits to stay on the site, send them a PM. It's quicker, more personal and more efficient.
Wouldnāt that give off pretty strong P@P farming vibes?
That depends on the context of the message lol?
I think you are actually kidding yourself that this would make you feel better about the situation of me playing new recruits.
My suggestion doesn't involve playing vs new recruits.
ljex wrote:So what exactly is the suggestion? PM them what?
ljex wrote:Have you done this to actually know that it is successful or are you just talking out of your ass because you think it may work?
ljex wrote:My personal thoughts would be that a PM does very little to encourage them to stay so I didn't do that. Could I be wrong, sure but if someone had posted somewhere that it worked I probably would have taken that up instead. As is I haven't seen any evidence to say this approach is successful so I will assume you are just making up an alternative.
Extreme Ways wrote:I actually applaud ljex's behaviour in this one, trying to connect with NR's. You can check his claims by comparing the start time of the game to the last seen date on a NR's profile. If he actually would be farming for the sake of farming, he would be much smarter about it. In its current state he's just trying to get NRs a good experience on a standard map with a by-effect of farming them.
I'm also curious why one would be interested to play a doubles with someone when you're about to report your teammate Game 19822664
iAmCaffeine wrote:ljex wrote:So what exactly is the suggestion? PM them what?
If I set off on a campaign to try and improve the retention of new recruits, I would send a PM welcoming them to the website, briefly mention the SoC, give some general advice about maps and settings, then perhaps offer to play a 2v2 doubles game with them. I would not join a large number of games knowing that 90% of them would result in deadbeats and I could be seen to be farming.ljex wrote:Have you done this to actually know that it is successful or are you just talking out of your ass because you think it may work?
I haven't done this exact thing but I've done similar in the past, yes. I have mentored many lower ranked and/or new players over the years, to varying degrees.ljex wrote:My personal thoughts would be that a PM does very little to encourage them to stay so I didn't do that. Could I be wrong, sure but if someone had posted somewhere that it worked I probably would have taken that up instead. As is I haven't seen any evidence to say this approach is successful so I will assume you are just making up an alternative.
My personal thought is that a personal, useful private message is more encouraging than spanking them in a game they likely won't fully understand. Losing without understanding how is a lot more frustrating than losing and at least knowing why.
Extreme Ways wrote:I'm also curious why one would be interested to play a doubles with someone when you're about to report your teammate Game 19822664
Extreme Ways wrote:In its current state he's just trying to get NRs a good experience on a standard map with a by-effect of farming them.
happyfeet wrote:When I first start I would get beat by higher rank guys. Guess what kept me motivated to keep trying to better myself. LOSSING. I would tell myself I'm as good as this guy and I'll prove it. I kept working til I got my hat. I think anyone who comes to the site understands the basic map. It's not like Ljex is inviting them to a map that they would not understand. Everyone understands the classic map. Lately thank you Ljexs for trying to reach out to the NRs. Giving the something to strive for.
ljex wrote:Honestly that puts a lot of onus on the NR to actually do research into the SOC and I doubt it has significant increases on retention rates but again show me the evidence if it is there. From everything you say it sounds like it is just a hunch and that we had different ideas for how to solve the same problem. The difference being that I did invest my time and you didn't. It could be that both of our ideas help or neither does but in my small sample size I did have a better retention rate than CC overall though admittedly still very low.
iAmCaffeine wrote:Extreme Ways wrote:I'm also curious why one would be interested to play a doubles with someone when you're about to report your teammate Game 19822664
That game started before I saw any of this.
I also hadn't seen any of his messages in this game until after I filed this report, and he told me via PM that he'd just told me about it in the game.Extreme Ways wrote:In its current state he's just trying to get NRs a good experience on a standard map with a by-effect of farming them.
That makes it ok then!happyfeet wrote:When I first start I would get beat by higher rank guys. Guess what kept me motivated to keep trying to better myself. LOSSING. I would tell myself I'm as good as this guy and I'll prove it. I kept working til I got my hat. I think anyone who comes to the site understands the basic map. It's not like Ljex is inviting them to a map that they would not understand. Everyone understands the classic map. Lately thank you Ljexs for trying to reach out to the NRs. Giving the something to strive for.
I'm not familiar with "lossing" and I wouldn't consider you, or anyone, a good player for just having a hat.ljex wrote:Honestly that puts a lot of onus on the NR to actually do research into the SOC and I doubt it has significant increases on retention rates but again show me the evidence if it is there. From everything you say it sounds like it is just a hunch and that we had different ideas for how to solve the same problem. The difference being that I did invest my time and you didn't. It could be that both of our ideas help or neither does but in my small sample size I did have a better retention rate than CC overall though admittedly still very low.
You keep asking for data to backup my argument while you have none for yours. My solution doesn't involve taking points from clueless players. Yours does.
We can argue all day long or we can sit and wait for this to be ruled on. Not complicated.
Edit: the other thing that concerns me here, is if we decide this is all fine, what kind of precedent does it set? Next thing you'll have JR24 joining every single NR game he sees and saying "if you have any questions let me know" but that's deemed to be ok because he copy/pasted a single message in every game. Where do you draw the line and how do you make it black/white so it's not abused?
happyfeet wrote:So...by what you just said. You wouldnt consider me or anyone a better player for just having a hat. What are you trying to prove with this thread? That we are all equal players. You are now saying what ljexs is doing is fine. (Which it is) You need to make up your mind you cant ride both sides.
I have no reason to check the chat in that game unless you ask me to do so, and you didn't.ljex wrote:I mean I posted it in the chat before this report was filled so not sure if you saw it but assumed that is what prompted you to look at my games. If not then you clearly have too much time on your hands and an agenda.
ljex wrote:To your edit, that is a fair argument and the most sound one you have made so far in this thread. I think the line is are you abusing it for points which I am clearly not. Had I played 50 games over the last 2 weeks all of which were me joining NR games then I would agree but as it stands this is 5-10% of my game total which will have very little affect on my score. I think the line of abuse is when this is a much larger % of overall games to the point where it can materially affect ones score but that is just me.
ljex wrote:Last point is that its pretty classless to throw another player into this accusation in JR24 for your hypothetical scenario of abuse when you could have easily made it non player specific as a scenario.
mc05025 wrote:This seems indeed against the rules but there is a problem that should be addressed first. The site is completely unable to handle the outburst of new recruits due to Covid-19. I signed up for guiding games and a crazy bombardment started with them. I stopped accepting speed games the second day but still after 5-6 days I had about 30 active guide games (autoaccepted) and my pm constantly spammed so much that I just stopped opening them.
So I would say, due to the sercumstances, any help to keep the NR around should be encouraged. It is also sad that the site has done almost nothing and it is completely unprepaired to handle this wave.
iAmCaffeine wrote:happyfeet wrote:So...by what you just said. You wouldnt consider me or anyone a better player for just having a hat. What are you trying to prove with this thread? That we are all equal players. You are now saying what ljexs is doing is fine. (Which it is) You need to make up your mind you cant ride both sides.
I don't know how to talk to you without insulting your intelligence so I'm just going to inform you that I will no longer answer your comments from now on because I feel like I'd have to headbutt a bus to equal your mental capacity. Hope that makes sense.I have no reason to check the chat in that game unless you ask me to do so, and you didn't.ljex wrote:I mean I posted it in the chat before this report was filled so not sure if you saw it but assumed that is what prompted you to look at my games. If not then you clearly have too much time on your hands and an agenda.ljex wrote:To your edit, that is a fair argument and the most sound one you have made so far in this thread. I think the line is are you abusing it for points which I am clearly not. Had I played 50 games over the last 2 weeks all of which were me joining NR games then I would agree but as it stands this is 5-10% of my game total which will have very little affect on my score. I think the line of abuse is when this is a much larger % of overall games to the point where it can materially affect ones score but that is just me.
If it's decided that what you're doing is fine but a rule is set in place to determine when it's abuse and when it's not, I'm okay with that.ljex wrote:Last point is that its pretty classless to throw another player into this accusation in JR24 for your hypothetical scenario of abuse when you could have easily made it non player specific as a scenario.
It's relevant actually: viewtopic.php?f=239&t=232764
Users browsing this forum: No registered users