iAmCaffeine wrote:Clanlord Carl wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:Clanlord Carl wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:just looked at the scoreboard for the first time ever. i'm a respectable #15. looking higher, there are 3 maybe 4 players i'd say are actually better than me. i dont mean specifically 1v1 but overall. is clanlord carl the best 1v1 player on the site? no. is he top 10? maybe, i don't care. looking at the rest of the top 50 there are definitely people i'd say are, in general, better players than me such as rockfist and urban jedi.
So how do you decide if someone is 'better' ? Again you state opinions without giving reasons or evidence.
I'm simply saying that such a vast number of matches will iron out random factors.
Lets look at the evidence.....
IamCaffeine our head to head 1v1 all time score is 9-4 nice but not quite enough to show if either of us is 'better' now if the score was 90-40 or 900-400 then yes i'd claim bragging rights if i was so inclined. For my amusement i then checked your head to head v your 'better' player Rockfist and to my surprise discovered you were 11 to 8 up in 1v1 while you beat UrbanJedi 1-0 how are they better than you ? I suppose it is possible they had awful luck but fought like demons with what they had.
As another aside my head to head v Rockfist is a very close 10v9 in 1v1 games.
I think you need evidence to support opinions.
This tourney will supply that in spades.
urban jedi is a legend around these parts, put some respect on his name
You could start by spelling it right there is no space in the mighty UrbanJedi
u r b a n j e d i
Jedi mind tricks can have a powerful effect on the weak minded. I suspect UrbanJedi may be suggesting to those he plays that he is a great player.