Conquer Club

Noted Rhino. Intentional deadbeating to benefit partner[ES]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]

Rhino. Intentional deadbeating to benefit partner[ES]

Postby mdhill on Sat Jul 13, 2019 1:33 am

Accused:

Rhino.

The accused are suspected of:
Other: Intentional deadbeating. Deadbeating in a team game to give his partner an advantage while continuing to take turns in another game.

Game number(s):

Game where deadbeating occurred: https://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=18812152

Game he was simultaneously taking turns: https://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=18912812
User avatar
Brigadier mdhill
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 3:39 pm
Location: Dallas

Re: Rhino. Intentional deadbeating to benefit partner[ES]

Postby iAmCaffeine on Sat Jul 13, 2019 5:59 pm

Hang him!
Image
User avatar
Cook iAmCaffeine
 
Posts: 11699
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: Rhino. Intentional deadbeating to benefit partner[ES]

Postby Evil Semp on Sat Jul 13, 2019 7:01 pm

iAmCaffeine wrote:Hang him!



As Steely Dan says in the song Do It Again "But the hangman isn't hangin"

No hanging today. To me it doesn't look like he was deadbeating to gain an advantage for his team. For about a week starting on 4 July he wasn't logging in everyday. He has 2 active games and both are 12 player doubles. He doesn't have a history of deliberately deadbeating and 97% turns taken. I am gong to give him the benefit of the doubt. I will however NOTE for future reference just in case I am wrong.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Evil Semp
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 8400
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:50 pm

Re: Rhino. Intentional deadbeating to benefit partner[ES]

Postby mdhill on Sat Jul 13, 2019 8:35 pm

Ok. Thanks for the detailed rationale.
User avatar
Brigadier mdhill
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 3:39 pm
Location: Dallas

Re: Rhino. Intentional deadbeating to benefit partner[ES]

Postby DBandit70 on Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:07 pm

I do not mean to sound stupid but how does deadbeating help his team
User avatar
Major DBandit70
 
Posts: 2197
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 10:21 pm
Location: Highest Score: 3612
3344

Re: Rhino. Intentional deadbeating to benefit partner[ES]

Postby Jdsizzleslice on Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:15 pm

DBandit70 wrote:I do not mean to sound stupid but how does deadbeating help his team

Bonuses and territory count, for starters.

Then, you think about regions, and position. What type of affect does position have in a game with fog, trench, unlimited or adjacent reinforcements, etc.

viewtopic.php?f=239&t=175618&p=3833591#p3833591
User avatar
Brigadier Jdsizzleslice
 
Posts: 3576
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 9:55 pm
32

Re: Rhino. Intentional deadbeating to benefit partner[ES]

Postby Donelladan on Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:10 pm

The topic you linked is about on old rule that doesn't exist anymore.

Before deadbeating the accused team was dropping 66 + 21 troops, 87 troops/turns.
After deadbeating the accused team is droping 89 troops/turns.

63 troops were lost by deadbeating.

So they'll get even in 31 turns.

Maybe I am missing something but I doubt it could be a good move.

Nevertheless this is one of the extremely rare case where it could be useful, a stalemate game where no ones attack. Because otherwise it's kinda impossible to make that a good move except if you are super lucky ( thus making it very difficult to work intentionally).

I know they have been only noted, but I just like to remind that in general deadbeating is not a viable strategy, like almost ever.
Image
User avatar
General Donelladan
 
Posts: 3605
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:48 am
5521839

Re: Rhino. Intentional deadbeating to benefit partner[ES]

Postby Jdsizzleslice on Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:14 pm

Donelladan wrote:The topic you linked is about on old rule that doesn't exist anymore.

Well yeah, it's an old rule. The reason I linked it was because the player accused was cleared because he took his turn and did not deadbeat his third consecutive turn.
User avatar
Brigadier Jdsizzleslice
 
Posts: 3576
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 9:55 pm
32


Return to Closed C&A Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users