![Image](https://i.makeagif.com/media/3-29-2017/7yuMd-.gif)
Moderator: Clan Directors
betiko wrote:being a mediocre player sticking with a bunch of top notch players for years is a sign of strength though?
Arama86n wrote:
Considering how you have behaved in this thread it warms my heart that this is rockfists watch.
loutil wrote:Just when I thought this thread could not get any more EPIC...
Arama86n wrote:betiko wrote:being a mediocre player sticking with a bunch of top notch players for years is a sign of strength though?
This made me laugh. But then you started trash talking my clan mates, so perhaps I will give you a reply;
Years is correct. It is exactly six years ago today (Friday the 14th of December 2012) that I was admitted into TOFU. Making me one of the five longest serving members in the clans history.
At the time I had just came off a year long break, I was noticed and recruited by the clan.
Since you think me mediocre, I will tell you the names of the people who played the trial games, the people who vetted me for membership in TOFU.
They are; Dako, Seulessliathan, catnipdreams, Chariot of Fire, Big Whiskey & Master Fenrir.
There was no honeymoon. When they admitted me into the clan, it was with the knowledge that the next war was the CC3 semi-final against KORT. Perhaps the most hyped and anticipated war in CC history. One could guess that these absolute CC legends had reason to believe I could be of some use...
I played my small part in that war. I played my heart out, giving everything I had not to make a mistake. I am truly proud to have been a part of that team, to have played in that war. When it counted I was there for my clan, and I did my part.
So disrespect me if you will. I paid my dues a long time ago. I was part of a team that won the Cup. I did my part.
Instead of talking shit, why don't you go focus on winning your own cup??
This is your shot, and you spend it embarrassing yourself in the forum instead?
You brag about your experience, about having been part of TOFU, while disrespecting Scud and Frog!? People like you are one of the reasons I have stayed. To make sure there is someone who remembers every mistake this clan has made, and can veto if old mistakes ever knock on the door again...
Considering how you have behaved in this thread it warms my heart that this is rockfists watch. You want that cup? You're going to have to claw it from his cold dead hands. With rising stars like .SCuD. and joecoolfrog on the case, led by legends like rock, cof & lou TOFU has room for a mediocre old has-been like myselfI can just sit back and smoke my pipe.
Long live The Odd Fellows Union.
& Happy 6th birthday to me![]()
Now... lassies, lads, felines and other Odd creatures, go bring home that Cup please.
Go TOFU!
Oh, and... about that carpet.
Extreme Ways wrote:Is donche perhaps female and called Emily?
Chariot of Fire wrote:The letter 'n' is upside-down
Scud wrote:If you reach the level of Don/Paengars (sorry anyone else in LHDD who is on that level too), I will play you, because your skill level would compel me to take that challenge. Let me know if you think you've made it.
Arama86n wrote:P.S. that post I made about the dice was directed at the dice discussion, definitely not towards LHDD. I've been saying that stuff for YEARS.
Donelladan wrote:Scud wrote:If you reach the level of Don/Paengars (sorry anyone else in LHDD who is on that level too), I will play you, because your skill level would compel me to take that challenge. Let me know if you think you've made it.
I don't think you know betiko good enough to make such a judgement.
He definitely reached equal level of skill than me. ( kinda the other way around actually). He just became a bit careless after reaching 10k games.
.SCuD. wrote:Donelladan wrote:Scud wrote:If you reach the level of Don/Paengars (sorry anyone else in LHDD who is on that level too), I will play you, because your skill level would compel me to take that challenge. Let me know if you think you've made it.
I don't think you know betiko good enough to make such a judgement.
He definitely reached equal level of skill than me. ( kinda the other way around actually). He just became a bit careless after reaching 10k games.
I've seen him play in this war, and some of his moves were subpar at best. No great player would have made those moves.
Yes, you need to play someone a lot to know they ARE great, but you can very quickly see that someone is average, as great players don't make that many poor moves. Great players also aren't so very very bad at analysing the fortunes of their own team... they tend to understand the maths better than that and have the ability to analyse more correctly. betiko fails both of these tests.
So I think I can confidently say that I do know him well enough to make such a judgement. Although you are right, I don't know you or Paengars well enough to make such a judgement. Simply going off your reputation. Perhaps you'll prove me wrong and be average too!
.SCuD. wrote: I also hope that we'll be allowed to pick more trench games in the future, as it's clearly your forte, and you deserve that.
iAmCaffeine wrote:.SCuD. wrote:Donelladan wrote:Scud wrote:If you reach the level of Don/Paengars (sorry anyone else in LHDD who is on that level too), I will play you, because your skill level would compel me to take that challenge. Let me know if you think you've made it.
I don't think you know betiko good enough to make such a judgement.
He definitely reached equal level of skill than me. ( kinda the other way around actually). He just became a bit careless after reaching 10k games.
I've seen him play in this war, and some of his moves were subpar at best. No great player would have made those moves.
Yes, you need to play someone a lot to know they ARE great, but you can very quickly see that someone is average, as great players don't make that many poor moves. Great players also aren't so very very bad at analysing the fortunes of their own team... they tend to understand the maths better than that and have the ability to analyse more correctly. betiko fails both of these tests.
So I think I can confidently say that I do know him well enough to make such a judgement. Although you are right, I don't know you or Paengars well enough to make such a judgement. Simply going off your reputation. Perhaps you'll prove me wrong and be average too!
Either you missed Don's point or just chose to ignore it, but he's saying that betiko has proven he can be a great player previously. These days he doesn't put as much effort into the game as he used to. I think those around at the time can testify that he was a very good player, at a wide variety of game modes too. He can also be emotional. I've seen josko and CoF make bad moves before and say/do stupid things, does that mean they're not or have never been good players? You're not as dense as this posts suggests you are either. Nobody is perfect. Nobody except me anyway.
ZaBeast wrote:.SCuD. wrote: I also hope that we'll be allowed to pick more trench games in the future, as it's clearly your forte, and you deserve that.
Not sure your leaders got the memo
.SCuD. wrote:
.SCuD. wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:.SCuD. wrote:Donelladan wrote:Scud wrote:If you reach the level of Don/Paengars (sorry anyone else in LHDD who is on that level too), I will play you, because your skill level would compel me to take that challenge. Let me know if you think you've made it.
I don't think you know betiko good enough to make such a judgement.
He definitely reached equal level of skill than me. ( kinda the other way around actually). He just became a bit careless after reaching 10k games.
I've seen him play in this war, and some of his moves were subpar at best. No great player would have made those moves.
Yes, you need to play someone a lot to know they ARE great, but you can very quickly see that someone is average, as great players don't make that many poor moves. Great players also aren't so very very bad at analysing the fortunes of their own team... they tend to understand the maths better than that and have the ability to analyse more correctly. betiko fails both of these tests.
So I think I can confidently say that I do know him well enough to make such a judgement. Although you are right, I don't know you or Paengars well enough to make such a judgement. Simply going off your reputation. Perhaps you'll prove me wrong and be average too!
Either you missed Don's point or just chose to ignore it, but he's saying that betiko has proven he can be a great player previously. These days he doesn't put as much effort into the game as he used to. I think those around at the time can testify that he was a very good player, at a wide variety of game modes too. He can also be emotional. I've seen josko and CoF make bad moves before and say/do stupid things, does that mean they're not or have never been good players? You're not as dense as this posts suggests you are either. Nobody is perfect. Nobody except me anyway.
Or you chose to ignore mine... or internet forums aren't the best way of ensuring accurate and complete communication. I suspect the second, but perhaps not!
The evidence I've seen would suggest that betiko was never a great player. I believe his knowledge and ability isn't that of someone who was once great, and deteriorated.
People can go from great, to not great, it happens all the time. There is usually evidence of their previous greatness in their speech and understanding. Most of us have examples in our own personal lives. Mine? I used to be a great poker player, and I'm not a great poker player anymore. I don't play enough, I'm careless, and I get distracted. I can still get by and do make money out of it, but I'm quite average. I could hold a conversation with a currently great player though, and they would find it very clear that I was once a great player, even though my knowledge is rusty.
I recently I played poker against a businessman who claimed he was a great poker player in the past. He was never great, that became very clear within 30 seconds. He simply misunderstood so many basic concepts of the game. He knew some buzzwords, but didn't actually understand their application. A great player may not always follow those concepts, but they will do so knowingly, with good reason. This guy just misunderstood them.
I get that same feeling with betiko. Beyond the constant whinging and whining (which doesn't make someone bad in itself), he simply doesn't seem to grasp aspects of the game in the way that I believe a great player who lost his touch would.
Perhaps I could be convinced otherwise. Perhaps his incessant need to prove that his complaining is justified creates a public refusal to admit that black is not white. Perhaps internally he knows he was wrong? If that's the case, then hell, maybe he could have been great? Anything is possible, but on evidence, it's unlikely.
Just to clarify, I think betiko is good. It's always difficult to tell in team games, but he seems to be good. Perhaps we just have a different definition of the word great
Users browsing this forum: No registered users