Accused:
risklover80
The accused are suspected of:
Intentional deadbeating
Game number(s):
Game 17280054
Comments: As soon as I broke his bonus the accused stopped playing.
Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Donelladan wrote:Accused:
risklover80
The accused are suspected of:
Intentional deadbeating
Game number(s):
Game 17280054
Comments: As soon as I broke his bonus the accused stopped playing.
Donelladan wrote:@mrswdk
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=222020
Donelladan wrote:Because I don't want to be standing over my computer waiting for the clock to run out. I wanna do other stuff maybe.
IcePack wrote:So now people going to get punished for not resigning?
Donelladan wrote:IcePack wrote:So now people going to get punished for not resigning?
shhhhh.. absolutely not, they are going to get punished for deadbeating. I have nothing against him if he keeps playing the game till I eliminate him.
Deadbeating has always been against the rule. I didn't speak in my report about resigning. It's mrswdk that asked what I told him in the chat to resign.
I did tell him, do not deadbeat, if you want to give up you can resign. But I didn't want him to resign, nor did I try to force him to resign.I only said so because he quitted.
Now I am reporting him for deadbeating. Deadbeating is against the rule.
Fyi, my favorite speed game setting is poly(3) trench on France 2.1, chained, no spoils. Not the game I played here, but that is the one I played the most often.
It is always faster to finish a poly(3) trench french 2.1 games rather than deadbeating it, even if it's a 1 min game. So yes, I don't want people to deadbeat speed games.
Before I wasn't reporting deadbeat because it was kind of OK. Now I am going to report every deadbeating person until no one deadbeat.
I've told you IcePack that I met people deadbeating even 1vs1 on classic NO trench during speed games. I would like to change how people behave in speed games so that no one deadbeat any games, because that is really annoying.
To do that, I am going to report every deadbeat I met during speed games.
Now, that's for my motivation, but concerning the case described in my 1st post, accused deadbeated the game, deadbeating isn't allowed, that's it.
IcePack wrote:I'm pretty sure you need more then 1 game as your evidence when you report for this.
Not only that, until you got your feature you were apparently just fine with it, and said "it was widely accepted practice" so now what...suddenly its reportable? Should we report all the trench speed players from the past before resign button then?
Its not suddenly against the rules because you have resign button.
It may annoy you, but pushing a damn resign button would be equally annoying to others (me). So, that really can't be justification either.
IcePack wrote:Should we report all the trench speed players from the past before resign button then?
king achilles wrote:Please stop making a circus out of the C&A forum. I know some of you insist that deadbeating is the only way to end a lost cause in poly trench games and you think that it should be the norm because some of you have already been doing it for some time. I have no qualms if both parties are okay with it and neither of the players is complaining about the game. Nevertheless, that still does not mean this system of intentional deadbeating is condoned. It is still in the rules not to intentionally deadbeat and definitely no one should make a habit out of it. The player has his rights to make a report if the other player is deadbeating intentionally.
If both players involved are fine with one leaving the poly trench game, then we'll consider it a closed case. However, if one party does not approve of the intentional deadbeating, then the other player must play the game. If you give out reasons like you suddenly lost connection coincidentally when you were losing, this is highly questionable and will not be accepted. Just play the game out and lose graciously. The game is not only about you so let's also respect the people we are playing with regardless of how the game is set.
IcePack wrote:Not only that, until you got your feature you were apparently just fine with it, and said "it was widely accepted practice" so now what...suddenly its reportable?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users