Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
laeloo wrote:Accused:
lemonade727
The accused are suspected of:
Point dumping
Game number(s):
Game 17055062 was the one I was in, but looking at his log he suddenly started losing a lot of games from missed turns/suiciding the past few days - he lost 11 out of his last 15 two player games, for example.
Comments:
In Game 17055062 lemonade727 very, very blatantly set up kcastanos to win. If you look at the game, you can see that Round 19 he spent all his troops even attacking the neutral territories on the board then spread his few remaining troops out for kcastanos to take.
Arama86n wrote:Looking at recently played games, and discounting games with more than two players I reached a count of 9-23 before I gave up counting. Not as compelling a case as a few recent ones [where the loss to win ratio was absolutely ridiculous], but the drop of score from 2100 to 800 and the evidence of certain specific games surely should cause a raised eyebrow or two.
lemonade727 wrote:I don't even know what "point dumping" is. The past several days were over a holiday weekend...I had family and friends in town and my priority was not taking turns on conquer club.
owenshooter wrote:[...] like for the rest of us with lives...[...]
Arama86n wrote:owenshooter wrote:[...] like for the rest of us with lives...[...]
![]()
![]()
Now there's one I won't forget for a while.
PS I don't give a shit about that scoreboard, hardly ever looked at it. But when I see absolutely blatant cheating in C&A [Krapht], and things not being done about it [xroads], I fricking lose it.
You spend month after month whining on about everything that is supposedly wrong with this site. Allow me this ONE pet peeve: Blatant cheaters that abuse the system in a way to make it hard to prosecute.
The fact that the OP is probably wrong about lemonade doesn't change the fact that there is an issue.
Arama86n wrote:The fact that the OP is probably wrong about lemonade doesn't change the fact that there is an issue.
laeloo wrote:You stand by one turn of yours that took the game from parity in troop #'s between 3 players, to 2 players with yourself at 1/4 the troops of the other guy and with no more than 1-3 guys per country? Please. That's not a strategy. It doesn't really matter what the board is.
lemonade727 wrote:laeloo wrote:
Yes, I do. I'm an aggressive player and make aggressive moves. I play almost exclusively escalating card games with 6+ players and I make a lot of bold moves. In the situation of our New World game, yes I had fewer troops than red once it was down to a 2-player game, but he was boxed in and could not use those troops against me on his next turn because they were on homelands blocked by his own troops. That means it was likely I would get another turn, and that I would get to cash in a big card payoff on that turn. It was a calculated decision, not a suicide.
Arama86n wrote:Looking at recently played games, and discounting games with more than two players I reached a count of 9-23 before I gave up counting. Not as compelling a case as a few recent ones [where the loss to win ratio was absolutely ridiculous], but the drop of score from 2100 to 800 and the evidence of certain specific games surely should cause a raised eyebrow or two.
owenshooter wrote:
if he doesn't like how you played, he has the option to foe you and move on. you don't need to answer to him, the mods will ask you any questions they feel they may want answered, and i doubt there will be ONE they want answered. keep enjoying the site, keep playing games and keep putting your life first. have a great day!
lemonade727 wrote:owenshooter wrote:
if he doesn't like how you played, he has the option to foe you and move on. you don't need to answer to him, the mods will ask you any questions they feel they may want answered, and i doubt there will be ONE they want answered. keep enjoying the site, keep playing games and keep putting your life first. have a great day!
Thanks for the support owenshooter
I agree! I will keep enjoying the game.
sniffie wrote:As usual, Owenshooter is 100% correct. He has yet to be wrong in C&A.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users